scholarly journals COMPARISON OF BACTERIAL DNA EXTRACTION METHODS FROM STOOL SAMPLES FOR QUANTITATIVE REAL-TIME PCR ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceren Ozkul KOCAK
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Real Time Pcr ◽  
Bacterial Dna ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
Bacterial Dna Extraction

Evaluation of DNA extraction methods and dilution treatment for detection and quantification of Acanthamoeba in water and biofilm by real-time PCR

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 2141-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Wen Chang ◽  
Ying-Chieh Wu
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Acanthamoeba Castellanii ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Human Pathogens ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Acanthamoeba, human pathogens and natural hosts of pathogenic bacteria, may be accurately detected and quantified by real-time PCR if Acanthamoeba DNA are properly extracted and PCR inhibitors are effectively eliminated. However, the optimization of DNA extraction methods has not been reported for Acanthamoeba. This study compared the effectiveness of two DNA extraction/purification methods (FastDNA® Spin Kit for soil and Wizard® SV genomic DNA Purification System) by using trophozoites and cysts of Acanthamoeba castellanii and water and biofilm samples of cooling towers. DNA of A. castellanii extracted with the FastDNA® Kit and quantified by TaqMan PCR resulted in a lower variation (CV of Ct < 3%), greater linearity (R2=0.99), and higher slopes (1.177–1.187 log fg DNA/log cell number) as compared to that by the Wizard® Kit. For field testing, the number of Acanthamoeba-positive samples and the Acanthamoeba DNA quantity were both greater with the FastDNA® Kit than with the Wizard® Kit (P=0.016 and <0.0001, respectively). Beneficial effects with dilutions of extracted DNA were also revealed with the FastDNA® Kit (P=0.0003). In conclusion, DNA extraction by the FastDNA® Kit coupled with dilution of extracted DNA and PCR analysis are recommended for detecting and quantifying environmental Acanthamoeba.

scholarly journals Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for quantifying Helicobacter pylori in water with PCR inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Sook Lee ◽  
So-Yang Cha ◽  
Jong-Soon Jung
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Heavy Rain ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Pcr Inhibitors ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Abstract DNA extraction methods were evaluated to reduce PCR inhibitors and quantify Helicobacter pylori directly from water samples using real-time PCR. Three nucleic acid extraction methods were evaluated for different types of water samples. While the QIAamp DNA mini kit for tissue was suitable for DNA extraction from treated water, the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit was still efficient in analyzing samples from river water after heavy rain and with high concentration of PCR inhibitors. The FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil could extract DNA effectively from microbes in river and stream waters without heavy rain. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) was used prior to DNA extraction and was a useful tool for reducing PCR inhibitors in influent and stream samples. H. pylori in various waters could be quantified directly by real-time PCR while minimizing the effect of PCR inhibitors by an appropriate method through the evaluation of DNA extraction methods considering the characteristics of the matrix water. The findings of the present study suggest that the types or characteristics of water sample by source and precipitation are an important factor in detecting H. pylori and they can be applied when detecting and monitoring of other pathogens in water.

A comparative study of DNA extraction methods to be used in real-time PCR based quantification of ochratoxin A-producing molds in food products

Food Control ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 666-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Rodríguez ◽  
Mar Rodríguez ◽  
M. Isabel Luque ◽  
Annemarie F. Justesen ◽  
Juan J. Córdoba
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Ochratoxin A ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Food Products ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

scholarly journals Evaluation of Two DNA Extraction Methods for Detection of Strongyloides stercoralis Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Barda ◽  
Rahel Wampfler ◽  
Somphou Sayasone ◽  
Khampheng Phongluxa ◽  
Syda Xayavong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Strongyloides Stercoralis ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Molecular Techniques ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
Baermann Method

ABSTRACT Strongyloides stercoralis is present worldwide, but its prevalence is still uncertain, mainly due to the lack of sensitivity of diagnostic methods. Molecular techniques are under development, but a standardized protocol is still unavailable. We compared the sensitivity of real-time PCR, using two extraction protocols, with that of the Baermann technique. Samples were collected in the framework of the baseline screening of a randomized clinical trial evaluating moxidectin against S. stercoralis in Lao People's Democratic Republic. Two stool samples from each participant were processed by the Baermann method, and one subsample was processed by PCR. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA stool minikit based on the standard protocol for the QIAamp DNA minikit (QIA) and using a modification of the QIA procedure (POL). Subsequently, all extracted samples were analyzed by real-time PCR. Overall, 95 samples were analyzed by the three diagnostic methods. Sixty-nine (72.6%) samples were positive according to the Baermann method, 25 (26.3%) by the QIA method, and 62 (65.3%) by the POL method. The sensitivities were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.7 to 92.9), 31.0% (95% CI, 21.3 to 42.6), and 78.0% (95% CI, 66.8 to 86.1) for the Baermann, QIA, and POL methods, respectively. The sensitivities calculated for each day of the Baermann method separately were 60% (48.4 to 70.8%) and 64% (52.2 to 74.2%) for days 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, the POL method revealed a good performance and was comparable to the Baermann test performed on two stool samples and superior to the Baermann method performed on one stool sample. Additional studies are needed to standardize a PCR protocol for S. stercoralis diagnosis.

scholarly journals Comparison of DNA extraction methods for Aspergillus fumigatus using real-time PCR

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1187-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa J. Griffiths ◽  
Martin Anyim ◽  
Sarah R. Doffman ◽  
Mark Wilks ◽  
Michael R. Millar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Diagnostic Technique ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Bead Beating ◽  
Fungal Dna ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
High Level

Newer methods such as PCR are being investigated in order to improve the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. One of the major obstacles to using PCR to diagnose aspergillosis is a reliable, simple method for extraction of the fungal DNA. The presence of a complex, sturdy cell wall that is resistant to lysis impairs extraction of the DNA by conventional methods employed for bacteria. Numerous fungal DNA extraction protocols have been described in the literature. However, these methods are time-consuming, require a high level of skill and may not be suitable for use as a routine diagnostic technique. Here, a number of extraction methods were compared: a freeze–thaw method, a freeze–boil method, enzyme extraction and a bead-beating method using Mini-BeadBeater-8. The quality and quantity of the DNA extracted was compared using real-time PCR. It was found that the use of a bead-beating method followed by extraction with AL buffer (Qiagen) was the most successful extraction technique, giving the greatest yield of DNA, and was also the least time-consuming method assessed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document