scholarly journals Influence of Laser Activated Irrigation with Erbium Lasers on Bond Strength of Inidividually Formed Fiber Reinforced Composite Posts to Root Canal Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Parčina Amižić ◽  
Ivana Miletić ◽  
Andrei Ionescu ◽  
Eugenio Brambilla ◽  
Dragana Gabrić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Erbium Lasers ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Root Canal Dentin

Bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite to root canal dentin following cyclic loading

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (13) ◽  
pp. 1397-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Nagas ◽  
Isil Cekic-Nagas ◽  
Ferhan Egilmez ◽  
Gulfem Ergun ◽  
Pekka K. Vallittu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Short Fiber ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Root Canal Dentin

Bond Strength of Composite Resin Luting Cements to Fiber-reinforced Composite Root Canal Post

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lippo Lassila ◽  
Anna-Maria Le Bell-Rönnlöf ◽  
Milla Lahdenperä ◽  
Pekka Vallittu
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to compare the attachment of different composite resin luting cements to a fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) post with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network polymer matrix. Methods and Materials Six different brands of composite resin luting cement stubs were applied on the surface of FRC post material and light-cured for 40 seconds. Shear bond strengths of luting cement stubs were measured using a universal testing machine. Results The differences in shear bond strengths between the cements were not statistically significant. Conclusion All of the tested composite resin luting cements provided acceptable attachment to the tested FRC post. The tested FRC post material is suitable to use with different composite resin luting cements. Citation Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM, Lahdenperä M, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Bond Strength of Composite Resin Luting Cements to Fiber-reinforced Composite Root Canal Post. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:017-024.

scholarly journals Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Naji Kharouf ◽  
Salvatore Sauro ◽  
Hamdi Jmal ◽  
Ammar Eid ◽  
Mohamed Karrout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Single Fiber ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Filling Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Push Out

The purpose of the present in vitro study was to investigate the bond strength of root canal dentin and the filling ability of a new multi-fiber-reinforced composite post (mFRC) compared to a conventional single fiber-reinforced-composite post (sFRC). Twenty-eight freshly maxillary first permanent single-rooted premolars were instrumented and divided into groups (n = 14). Group 1: single-fiber-reinforced composite (sFRC), group 2: multi-fiber-reinforced composite (mFRC). Bonding procedures were performed using a dual-cure universal adhesive system and resin cement. All specimens were sectioned so that seven discs of 1 mm of thickness were obtained from each root. An optical microscope was used before the push-out test to measure the total area of the voids and to determine the length of the smaller/bigger circumferences. The push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. Data were then compared by one-way ANOVA on ranks (α = 0.05). The dentin–cement–post interface was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). At the coronal third, a significantly higher bond strength (p < 0.05) was obtained in the sFRC group (44.7 ± 13.1 MPa) compared to the mFRC group (37.2 ± 9.2 MPa). No significant difference was detected between the groups at the middle third (sFRC group “33.7 ± 12.5 MPa” and mFRC group “32.6 ± 12.4 MPa”) (p > 0.05). Voids were significantly lower in the mFRC compared to those observed in the sFRC group (p < 0.05) at the coronal third. Whereas, no significant difference was found at the middle third (p > 0.05) between the tested groups. Filling ability was overall improved when employing mFRC, although such technique might have characteristic limitations concerning the bond strength to dentin.

scholarly journals The Interference of the Cleaning Procedure of Root Walls with Two Different Solvents on the Adhesion of Fiberglass Intraradicular Posts

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Fatima Gomes ◽  
Sergio Brossi Botta ◽  
Adriana Bona Matos ◽  
Narciso Garone-Netto
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Zinc Phosphate ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Cleaning Procedure ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Aim This study was undertaken to examine the effect of root canal (RT) sealers content and the cleaning procedure of RT walls on bond strength (BS) of a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) post cemented with resin-based or zinc phosphate cement. Materials and methods Forty bovine roots were divided into 2 groups (n = 20) and obturated with gutta-percha points plus Sealer 26 sealer or gutta-percha points plus N-Rickert sealer. In each group, half (n = 10) of intracanal walls was cleaned with ethanol and the other half with sulfuric ether. In each of these subgroups, half of intracanal posts (n = 5) were cemented with Bistite resin-based cement and half with zinc phosphate cement. Specimens were submitted to pull-out test and tensile force until post dislodgement. The maximum forces required for post removal was expressed in MPa, means were submitted to statistical analysis (Analysis of Variance Test, α = 0.05). Results Fiber reinforced composite cemented with zinc phosphate were significantly more retentive than those cemented with Bistite (p < 0.05). Regarding the influence of eugenol-based sealer on post retention, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) only between groups cemented with Bistite, in which canals filled with N-Rickert + gutta-percha showed lower BS than canals filled with Sealer 26 + gutta-percha. Conclusion Despite endodontic cement used, higher pull-out bond strength were obtained when posts were cemented with zinc phosphate. Clinical significance The importance of ethanol or sulphuric ether application to properly replace water from intraradicular dentine still requires further investigations, especially to clarify if this technique may reduce the effect of aging and improve the stability of the bond, when used to cement fiber posts into the root canal. How to cite this article Gomes MF, Botta SB, Matos AB, Garone- Netto N. The Interference of the Cleaning Procedure of Root Walls with Two Different Solvents on the Adhesion of Fiberglass Intraradicular Posts. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):275-279.

scholarly journals Introduction to Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC) Post, A New Era in Reinforcing Esthetics: A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
CM Jan ◽  
F Rashid ◽  
NA Nomann ◽  
AJ Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
New Era ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Endodontically Treated Tooth

The restoration of a root canal treated or, endodontically treated teeth, is often can be achieved with post and core because of the significant loss of tooth structure. Until the mid-1980s, the safest way to restore an endodontically treated tooth was considered to be the cast-metal post, made indirectly by a dental technician. Also prefabricated metal posts in combination with different core materials under artificial crowns were used. The development and use of fiber reinforced composite (FRC) root canal posts over metallic posts make possible of the attachment & reinforcement of the crown with maximum esthetics. This paper illustrates a technique for rehabilitation of an endodontically treated maxillary central incisor of both sides (UL1 & UR1) with a fiber reinforced composite post (FRC post) & discusses the advantages, disadvantages of metallic post over fiber reinforced composite (FRC) posts.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjdre.v3i1.16595 Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education Vol.3(1) 2013: 45-48

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document