Vertical Mandibular Alveolar Bone Distraction and Dental Implant Placement: A Case Report

10.1563/749.1 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago ◽  
M. Dolores Gómez-Adrián ◽  
Abel García-García ◽  
Fabio Camacho-Alonso ◽  
Javier Rambla-Ferrer
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Bone Distraction ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Implant Loading

Abstract Extensive bone defects complicate the adequate placement of dental implants and the required angulation. In such cases, alveolar-ridge augmentation techniques such as guided bone regeneration, particulate or block grafting, and alveolar bone distraction are needed. The present study describes a case in which a large vertical bone defect in the anterior mandibular zone was corrected via vertical alveolar bone distraction. Six dental implants were posteriorly placed for implant-supported restoration of the mandible, with early implant loading. The clinical and radiologic control showed good implant and soft tissue conditions 12 months later.

scholarly journals Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Techniques in Implant Dentistry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melike Aytekin ◽  
Volkan Arisan
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Implant Dentistry ◽  
Reconstruction Of Bone Defects

Implant supported restorations have become an ideal treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of edentulous sites. However alveolar bone defects due to resorption, trauma or oncologic diseases may considerably affect favorable implant positioning and prosthetic outcomes. Various alveolar ridge augmentation procedures are available to gain enough bone volume and apply the ideal treatment plan afterwards. Guided bone regeneration, ridge splitting, distraction osteogenesis, maxillary sinus augmentation and autogenous block bone grafting are main techniques which have successful outcomes in reconstruction of bone defects. It’s difficult to demonstrate that one augmentation procedure offers better outcomes than another. Studies documenting augmentation techniques seem to be comparable and state favorable results for each procedure.

scholarly journals Alveolar Bone Augmentation

2014 ◽  
Vol 614 ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cena Dimova ◽  
Kiro Papakoca ◽  
Velko Papakoca
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implant ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Bone Volume ◽  
The Body ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement

Bones and teeth are the only structureswithin the body where calciumandphosphate participate asfunctional pillars. Despite their mineralnature, both organs are vital and dynamic. The aim was to remark the indications for alveolar augmentation after tooth extraction and prior the placement of endoosseous dental implants. The autograft, allograft, alloplast, and xenograftmaterials all have reported success, alone or in combination,for particulate bone augmentation. Theparticulate autograft is the gold standard for mostcraniofacial bone grafting, including the treatmentof dental implant–related defects. Advantages of alveolar ridge augmentation with sufficient bone volume to adjust for uncompromised and esthetic implant placement, renders these procedures more than effective for majority of patients. Surgical reconstruction of the tissues and the procedure of ridge augmentation and subsequent placement of dental implant are necessary.

scholarly journals ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION USING AUTOGENOUS CHIN GRAFT AND SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT. A CASE REPORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 501-507
Author(s):  
Deepika Gorantla ◽  
◽  
SVVS Musalaiah ◽  
Pavuluri Aravind Kumar ◽  
Narendra Babu M. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Can the Macrogeometry of Dental Implants Influence Guided Bone Regeneration in Buccal Bone Defects? Histomorphometric and Biomechanical Analysis in Beagle Dogs

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Fernández-Domínguez ◽  
Victor Ortega-Asensio ◽  
Elena Fuentes Numancia ◽  
Juan Aragoneses ◽  
Horia Barbu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Animal Study ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Beagle Dogs ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Cervical Portion

The aim of this experimental animal study was to assess guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implant stability (ISQ) around two dental implants with different macrogeometries. Forty eight dental implants were placed within six Beagle dogs. The implants were divided into two groups (n = 24 per group): G1 group implants presented semi-conical macrogeometry, a low apical self-tapping portion, and an external hexagonal connection (whereby the cervical portion was bigger than the implant body). G2 group implants presented parallel walls macrogeometry, a strong apical self-tapping portion, and an external hexagonal connection (with the cervical portion parallel to the implant body). Buccal (mouth-related) defects of 2 mm (c2 condition) and 5 mm (c3 condition) were created. For the control condition with no defect (c1), implants were installed at crestal bone level. Eight implants in each group were installed under each condition. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after implant placement, and on the day of sacrifice (3 months after the implant placement). Histological and histomorphometric procedures and analysis were performed to assess all samples, measuring crestal bone loss (CBL) and bone-to-implant contact (BIC). The data obtained were compared with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The ISQ results showed a similar evolution between the groups at the two evaluation times, although higher values were found in the G1 group under all conditions. Within the limitations of this animal study, it may be concluded that implant macrogeometry is an important factor influencing guided bone regeneration in buccal defects. Group G1 showed better buccal bone regeneration (CBL) and BIC % at 3 months follow up, also parallel collar design can stimulate bone regeneration more than divergent collar design implants. The apical portion of the implant, with a stronger self-tapping feature, may provide better initial stability, even in the presence of a bone defect in the buccal area.

Alternative Distraction Osteogenesis Technique After Implant Placement for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation of the Maxilla

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1402.e1-1402.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Luiz Maia Nogueira ◽  
Rafael Lima Verde Osterne ◽  
Ricardo Teixeira Abreu ◽  
Phelype Maia Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Comparison of 4 sinus augmentation techniques for implant placement with residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (46) ◽  
pp. e23180
Author(s):  
Chia-Fang Tsai ◽  
Whei-Lin Pan ◽  
Yi-Ping Pan ◽  
Chiu-Po Chan ◽  
Yuh-Ren Ju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Bone Height

scholarly journals Surgical Approaches Based on Biological Objectives: GTR versus GBR Techniques

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaia Pellegrini ◽  
Giorgio Pagni ◽  
Giulio Rasperini
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Disease ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Biological Basis ◽  
Ridge Augmentation

Guided tissue regenerative (GTR) therapies are performed to regenerate the previously lost tooth supporting structure, thus maintaining the aesthetics and masticatory function of the available dentition. Alveolar ridge augmentation procedures (GBR) intend to regain the alveolar bone lost following tooth extraction and/or periodontal disease. Several biomaterials and surgical approaches have been proposed. In this paper we report biomaterials and surgical techniques used for periodontal and bone regenerative procedures. Particular attention will be adopted to highlight the biological basis for the different therapeutic approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document