Homeopathic remedies to prevent and treat children acute respiratory viral infections: a comparative efficacy and safety analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
S.O. Mokiya-Serbina ◽  
◽  
V.V. Chechel ◽  
N.I. Zabolotnyaya ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infections ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections ◽  
Homeopathic Remedies

scholarly journals Study of effectiveness of antiviral drugs (umifenovir, triazavirin) against acute respiratory viral infections

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
E P Tikhonova ◽  
T Yu Kuz'mina ◽  
N V Andronova ◽  
O A Tyushevskaya ◽  
T A Elistratova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiviral Therapy ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Antiviral Drug ◽  
Antiviral Drugs ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections ◽  
Adaptive Reactions

Aim. Comparative study of clinical efficacy and safety of antiviral drug triazavirin and umifenovir in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory viral infections and influenza. Methods. The study included 100 patients aged 18 to 65 years diagnosed with moderate acute respiratory viral infection. Group 1 included 34 patients receiving umifenovir 200 mg 4 times a day for 5 days, and comparison group included 32 patients who received triazavirin 1 capsule (250 mg) 3 times a day for 5 days. Group 3 (control group) included 34 patients not treated with antiviral therapy. Efficacy and safety of the studied antiviral drugs were evaluated based on clinical symptoms in the disease course and were confirmed by adaptive reactions of the organism. Results. Among patients receiving triazavirin, recovery time and fever, headache and catarrhal syndrome resolution time were less than among patients who received umifenovir. On triazavirin treatment with favorable tolerability, symptomatic medications (antipyretics) were discontinued, and the duration of their use was less, than in patients receiving umifenovir. Evaluation of clinical efficacy of umifenovir and triazavirin for the treatment of acute respiratory viral infections and influenza demonstrated that the drugs effectively reverse the main symptoms of the disease (p <0.05), reduce complications incidence (18.1±2.1% vs. 55.9±3.2%, p <0.05) and contribute to the stabilization of adaptive reactions of the organism in contrast to the results of patients not receiving etiotropic therapy (6.9±2.9% vs. 12.8±2.7, p <0.05). During the use of umifenovir by day 4 and during the use of triazavirin by day 3 intoxication and catarrhal syndromes had been reversed, while in case of the absence of antiviral therapy, 55.8% of patients had continuing intoxication and catarrhal symptoms. Conclusion. The results of the study allow defining umifenovir and triazavirin as the first line of defense against acute respiratory viral infections with good efficacy and tolerability of the drugs.

scholarly journals Kagocel in the therapy of influenza and acute respiratory viral infections: Data analysis and systematization from the results of preclinical and clinical trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
T V Sologub ◽  
V V Tsvetkov
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Treatment And Prevention ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

The article provides the summarized data of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of kagocel used to prevent and treat influenza and acute respiratory viral infections of different etiologies. The results of numerous preclinical and clinical trials suggest that the kagocel substance is highly safe and that it is appropriate to use the drug for the treatment and prevention of influenza and acute respiratory viral infections of another etiology.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Anaferon for children and Anaferon for the prevention and treatment of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-347
Author(s):  
N.A. Geppe ◽  
◽  
A.L. Zaplatnikov ◽  
E.G. Kondyurina ◽  
O.I. Afanasieva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Respiratory Infections ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anaferon and Anaferon for children for the prevention and treatment of of acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI)/influenza using meta-analysis. Patients and Methods: the meta-analysis included data from 11 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 3079 patients aged 1 month to 69 years, of which: 1729 people were included in the meta-analysis of the preventive drugs efficacy, 1550 patients — in the meta-analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of Anaferon for children. The evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy was conducted according to the criteria "disease duration" and/or "fever duration", the evaluation of the preventive efficacy was conducted according to the criterion "the proportion of patients not falling ill with ARVI/influenza". The safety was evaluated taking into account the number of adverse events (AEs). Statistical methods included the exact Fisher criterion, the Student criterion, fixed and random effects models, the Z-test, the Cochrane-Mantel-Hensel criterion, Cochrane Q-statistics and the I2 coefficient, the Breslow-Day test, the calculation of relative risk (RR), odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: according to the criterion "the proportion of patients not falling ill with ARVI/influenza", the RR of Anaferon for children was 1.2 [95% CI 1.2; 1.3] with an OR of 2.2 [95% CI 1.7; 2.9], while for Anaferon, the RR was 6.7 [95% CI 3.8; 11.8] with an OR of 20.1 [95% CI 9.2; 44.0]. At the same time, the proportion of patients without ARVI/influenza during Anaferon intake exceeded that in the absence of preventive intervention by almost 8 times, and during Anaferon for children intake — 1.3 times vs. placebo. When evaluating the therapeutic effect of Anaferon for children, it was found that the average disease duration was 1.4 times shorter than during placebo intake, and was 4.71±2.53 days (p<0,001). The average fever duration was 2.19±1.21 days vs. 3.22±1.81 days during placebo intake (p<0,001). According to the criterion "disease duration", the weighted average effect value was 1.05 [95% CI 0.44; 1.67], according to the criterion "fever duration" — 0.97 [95% CI 0.61; 1.33] (p<0.001, p-value of the two-tailed Z-test; random effects model). The therapeutic efficacy of Anaferon for children did not depend on the etiology of ARVI, the symptoms, and the presence of comorbidity (asthma). The total number of AEs is similar to those in the comparison group. Conclusion: the conducted review and meta-analysis concerning the efficacy and safety of Anaferon and Anaferon for children for the treatment and prevention of ARVI/influenza allow us to conclude the following: 1) Anaferon for children is effective and safe for the treatment of influenza and other acute respiratory infections, regardless of the pathogen and the presence of comorbidity (asthma); 2) Anaferon and Anaferon for children are effective and safe for the prevention of acute respiratory infections/influenza, including patients with concomitant bronchopulmonary pathology and frequently ill children. KEYWORDS: ARVI, influenza, prevention, treatment, meta-analysis, Anaferon, Anaferon for children. FOR CITATION: Geppe N.A., Zaplatnikov A.L., Kondyurina E.G. et al. Efficacy and safety of Anaferon for children and Anaferon for the prevention and treatment of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(5):335–347 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-5-335-347.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma for severe COVID-19 based on evidence in other severe respiratory viral infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 192 (27) ◽  
pp. E745-E755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niveditha Devasenapathy ◽  
Zhikang Ye ◽  
Mark Loeb ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
Borna Tadayon Najafabadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

Treatment of acute respiratory viral infections: results of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-189
Author(s):  
V.V. Rafalsky ◽  
◽  
R.F. Khamitov ◽  
T.I. Martynenko ◽  
M.V. Chernogorova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to obtain additional data on the efficacy and safety of Anaferon for the treatment of acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) during seasonal increase in their incidence (RCT of the Ministry of Health of Russia No 356 dated 24.07.2018; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03707912). Patients and methods. Between October 2018 and March 2019, a total of 204 patients aged 18 to 70 years with ARVI symptoms were included in this study within the first 24 hours of symptom onset. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: 104 individuals received oral Anaferon (should be kept in the mouth until completely dissolved and without food) according to the following scheme: 1 tablet every 30 minutes during the first 2 hours; then 3 more doses at regular intervals during the first day; then 1 tablet 3 times a day on days 2–5; 100 individuals received placebo according to the same scheme. The primary endpoint was time to resolution of symptoms of clinically diagnosed and/or PCR (polymerase chain reaction) – confirmed ARVI. Addithional endpoints included: time to resolution of symptoms of ARVI confirmed by PCR; proportion of patients with resolution of symptoms of clinically diagnosed and/or PCR-confirmed ARVI and separately PCR-confirmed ARVI; severity of clinically diagnosed and/or PCR-confirmed ARVI (assessed by ‘area under the curve’ for the total severity index); the number of antipyretic doses taken according to indications on days 1–3 of treatment (checked in the patient's diary); proportion of patients who required antibiotic treatment on days 4–7 of follow-up. To assess safety, we analyzed the incidence and type of adverse events (AEs), their severity, association with drug use, and treatment outcome. The following statistical methods were used: Fisher's exact test, Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test, Wilcoxon test, and repeated measures ANOVA, PROC MIXED. Results. A total of 203 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (РР) analysis: 103 [95] individuals in the Anaferon arm and 100 [93] individuals in the Placebo arm. Patients receiving Anaferon had significantly shorter time to resolution of all ARVI symptoms than patients receiving placebo: 4.1 ± 1.6 days vs 4.5 ± 1.5 days (p = 0.032). The disease was on average 1 day shorter in patients from the experimental group compared to controls: 3.6 ± 1.5 days vs 4.6 ± 1.5 days (p = 0.007). The proportion of patients who had resolution of symptoms of clinically diagnosed and/or PCR-confirmed ARVI was significantly higher in the Anaferon arm compared to Placebo arm (p = 0.0012). Among patients with PCR-verified ARVI, treatment with Anaferon resulted in twice as frequent recovery as in the control group on day 4 (53.7% vs 26.3%) and day 7 (70.7% vs 36.8%). In the Anaferon arm, we observed shorter disease duration and higher proportion of patients recovered compared to the Placebo arm; however, patients in both groups had a similar need for antipyretic drugs on days 1–3 of treatment, as well as for antibiotic therapy. The incidence of AEs in the Anaferon and Placebo groups did not vary significantly. No AEs with a reliable association with Anaferon were registered. Conclusion. Our findings suggest high efficacy and safety of Anaferon in patients with ARVI. The best results were obtained in patients with PCR-verified diagnosis, which can be attributed to the involvement of the interferon system in the action of the drug. The results of this RCT confirm the data obtained in previous studies and long-term clinical experience of using Anaferon. Key words: acute respiratory viral infections, ARVI, treatment, effective therapy, placebo-controlled study, Anaferon, randomized clinical trial, comprehensive therapy, efficacy, safety

scholarly journals Prevention of acute respiratory viral infections and influenza in children during the peaks of seasonal morbidity: the results of the international double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-120
Author(s):  
N. A. Geppe ◽  
A. V. Gorelov ◽  
O. V. Shamsheva ◽  
I. G. Sitnikov ◽  
E. P. Sitnikova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Preventive Therapy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

The authors conducted an international multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to obtain additional data on the efficacy and safety of a 12-week course of Anaferon for children for the prevention of acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI), including influenza, in children during the rise in seasonal morbidity (RCT of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: №356 dated June 29, 2017; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03301155).Materials and methods. The study involved 1,036 children (1 month – 6 years 11 months 29 days) during two epidemiological seasons. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 528 patients received Anaferon for children 1 tablet a day for 12 weeks, 508 patients received placebo according to Anaferon for children scheme. The primary end point was the duration of the period from the first dose of the drug until manifestation of ARVI/influenza. Additional end points were percentage of children not falling with ARVI/influenza during 4-, 8- and 12-week course of preventive therapy; percentage of children with respiratory or ear-nose-throat bacterial infections requiring antibiotics within 12 week; percentage of children hospitalized with ARVI/influenza or their complications within 12 week. To assess safety, the authors analyzed the presence and nature of the adverse events (AEs), their severity, connection with the medication, outcome. The authors used the following statistical methods: calculation of hazard ratio, median time to the manifestation of symptoms of ARVI / influenza, 95% confidence intervals.Results. The Intention-to-treat (ITT) and Per Protocol [РР] analysis included the data of 1,021 [975] patients: 520 [494] – Anaferon for children group and 501 [481] –Placebo group. The average duration of the period from the first dose of the drug to the development of ARVI/influenza symptoms obtained as a result of the analysis of the statistical model was 428.8 [434.1] days for Anaferon for children group, that is 1.5 times higher than in Placebo group (275.8 [274.9] days; p=0.001 [p=0.0009]). The percentage of children without ARVI/influenza was 99.2% [99.2%] in Anaferon for children group (versus 90.2% [90.0%] in Placebo group; p=0.0003 [p=0.0003]) within 4 weeks, 92.7% [92.3%] (versus 82.8% [82.7%]; p=0.0003 [p=0.0003]) within 8 weeks, and 81.5% [81.8%] (versus 73.4% [73.4%], respectively; p=0.0021 [p=0.0021]). None of the patients was hospitalized for ARVI/influenza or complications. The frequency of AEs in Anaferon for children and Placebo groups had no differ. No one AE definitely related to the study drug was registered.Conclusion. The results confirm the efficacy and safety of a 12-week course of Anaferon for children to prevent ARVI and influenza during seasonal rise of morbidity in children.

scholarly journals The use of innovative domestic interferon inducer for the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory viral infections in children

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. L. Mizernitskiy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Interferon Inducer ◽  
Interferon Inducers ◽  
Treatment And Prevention ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

The article presents data on the place of the modern endogenous interferon inducers in the treatment and prevention of influenza and ARVI in children and the mechanisms of action. The focus is on the domestic antiviral innovation Kagocel which demonstrated high clinical efficacy and safety in a number of multi-center, blind, placebo-controlled studies of the treatment and prevention of ARVI/flu in children over 2 years old.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document