Numerical Analysis of Transient Capacitance Data Obtained from Titanium Induced Levels in Silicon

1986 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Courcelle ◽  
A. Mesli ◽  
P. Siffert
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Capture Cross Section ◽  
Donor Level ◽  
Hole Trap ◽  
Capture Cross ◽  
Electron Capture Cross Section ◽  
Transient Capacitance ◽  
Capacitance Transient ◽  
Transient Measurements ◽  
Trap Filling

AbstractUsing electrical and optical DLTS analysis based on the capacitance transient measurements and taking into account the spatially dependent capture and the competition between emission and capture, parameters of Titanium levels in silicon are derived. By curve fitting the calculation to trap-filling data, the electron capture cross section of the first donor level (Ec - .284 eV) is found to be 5.8 10-15 exp (.013/kT)cm2 at ξ= 5 104 V/cm. The hole trap capture cross section of the second donor level (Ev + .260 eV) is found to be 1.97 10-17exp (-.017/kT)cm2 at zero electric field.

scholarly journals FAST NEGATIVE HYDROGEN IONS

1954 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Charles Whittier
Keyword(s):  
Electron Capture ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Capture Cross Section ◽  
Hydrogen Gas ◽  
Negative Ion ◽  
Hydrogen Ions ◽  
Capture Cross ◽  
Electron Capture Cross Section ◽  
Magnetic Analysis ◽  
Equilibrium Ratio

A proton beam was directed through hydrogen gas at low pressure and magnetic analysis of the emergent beam showed that an appreciable fraction of the beam was transformed into negative hydrogen ions. After the beam had traversed a sufficient layer of gas, the ratio of negative hydrogen ions to protons reached an equilibrium value which was a maximum of 22.2% at 8.5 kev. The proton energy interval investigated extended from 4 to 70 kev.In this interval the electron loss cross section for negative hydrogen ions was measured and found to vary from 6.3 × 10−16 sq. cm. at 4.2 kev. to 2.5 × 10−10 sq. cm. at 70.3 kev. The electron capture cross section for protons in hydrogen was measured over the same interval and the results agreed substantially with those of other workers. The electron capture cross section for neutral atoms was also determined by combining present results for the negative ion loss cross section and for the equilibrium ratio of H− to H+ with the values of Bartels and of Montague and Ribe for the ratio of neutral atom loss cross section to the proton capture cross section.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document