Detailed Description of a Long-Term Low-Level Waste Degradation Experiment

1996 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Caron ◽  
J. Torok ◽  
M. K. Haas ◽  
G. Manni

ABSTRACTThis work gives a detailed description of the important aspects of a long-term Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) degradation experiment, performed at Chalk River Laboratories (CRL). This experiment utilized actual LLRW. The wastes consist of unconditioned compacted refuse (paper, mop heads, paper towels, used clothing, etc), which represents the bulk of the waste volume intended for near-surface disposal at CRL. Waste material was collected and compacted to make a total of 11 bales for this experiment. Each bale was then placed and sealed in separate steel containers which were connected to sampling lines. After a dry monitoring period, water was added to promote leaching and decomposition of the wastes. The leachate sampled had a composition similar to landfill leachates. Some applications of this experiment, used to support the safety case of near-surface disposal, are briefly discussed in this paper, e.g., the production of colloidal material, the nature and role of dissolved organics of microbial origin, etc.

1996 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Caron ◽  
M. K. Haas ◽  
G. Manni ◽  
J. Torok

ABSTRACTA long-term waste degradation experiment has been performed with actual low-level radioactive wastes (LLRW) at the Chalk River Laboratories (CRL), to support the licensing and modelling efforts for near-surface disposal. The wastes consist of paper, mop heads, paper towels, used clothing, etc. The wastes were compacted into bales and sealed into separate steel containers, which were connected to leachate collection systems for sampling. The leachates collected had a composition typical of landfill leachates. The major inorganic ions were Na, Ca, Cl, and Fe, and the ionic strength was ∼0.05 M. The relative distribution of inorganic ions in the leachates was remarkably similar between bales. Volatile fatty acids (VFA) were the major species of dissolved organic carbon (DOC, total DOC up to 7000 mg/L). A typical composition of leachates is proposed, which can be used in geochemical and source term modelling.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Nicholas Chan ◽  
Pierre Wong

Segregating radioactive waste at the source and reclassifying radioactive waste to lower waste classes are the key activities to reduce the environmental footprint and long-term liability. In the Canadian Standards Association’s radioactive waste classification system, there are 2 sub-classes within low-level radioactive waste: very short-lived radioactive waste and very low-level radioactive waste (VLLW). VLLW has a low hazard potential but is above the Canadian unconditional clearance criteria as set out in Schedule 2 of Nuclear Substances and Devices Regulations. Long-term waste management facilities for VLLW do not require a high degree of containment and isolation. In general, a relatively low-cost near-surface facility with limited regulatory control is suitable for VLLW. At Canadian Nuclear Laboratories’ Chalk River Laboratories site an initiative, VLLW Sequestration, was implemented in 2013 to set aside potential VLLW for temporary storage and to be later dispositioned in the planned VLLW facility. As of May 2015, a total of 236 m3 resulting in approximately $1.1 million in total savings have been sequestered. One of the main hurdles in implementing VLLW Sequestration is the development of process criteria. Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) are used as a guide or as requirements for determining whether waste is accepted by the waste management facility. Establishment of the process criteria ensures that segregated waste materials have a high likelihood to meet the VLLW WAC and be accepted into the planned VLLW facility. This paper outlines the challenges and various factors which were considered in the development of interim process criteria.


1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Jr. McConnell ◽  
R.D. Rogers ◽  
J.D. Jastrow ◽  
W.E. Sanford ◽  
T.M. Sullivan

Author(s):  
Tim. Hicks ◽  
Tamara Baldwin ◽  
Richard Cummings ◽  
Trevor Sumerling

The UK Low Level Waste Repository Ltd submitted an Environmental Safety Case for the disposal of low-level waste (LLW) to the Environment Agency on the 1st of May 2011. The Environmental Safety Case (ESC) presents a complete case for the environmental safety of the Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) both during operations and in the long term (Cummings et al, in these proceedings). This includes an assessment of the long-term radiological safety of the facility, including an assessment of the potential consequences of human intrusion at the site. The human intrusion assessment is based on a cautiously realistic approach in defining intrusion cases and parameter values. A range of possible human intrusion events was considered based on present-day technologies and credible future uses of the site. This process resulted in the identification of geotechnical investigations, a housing development and a smallholding as requiring quantitative assessment. A particular feature of the site is that, because of its proximity to the coast and in view of expected global sea-level rise, it is vulnerable to coastal erosion. During such erosion, wastes and engineered barrier materials will be exposed, and could become targets for investigation or recovery. Therefore, human intrusion events have been included that are associated with such activities. A radiological assessment model has been developed to analyse the impacts of potential human intrusion at the site. A key feature of the model is the representation of the spatial layout of the disposal site, including the engineered cap design and the large-scale spatial heterogeneity of radionuclide concentrations within the repository. The model has been used to calculate the radiation dose to intruders and to others following intrusion at different times and at different locations across the site, for the each of the selected intrusion events, considering all relevant exposure modes. Potential doses due to radon and its daughters in buildings constructed on excavated spoil from the repository are a particular concern. Options for managing the emplacement of the radium-bearing waste packages with regard to human intrusion have been assessed. These calculations show that a managed waste emplacement strategy can ensure that calculated doses are consistent with regulatory guidance levels.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Eckmeier ◽  
Simon Kübler ◽  
Akida Meya ◽  
Stephen Mathai Rucina

<p>The East African Serengeti ecosystem hosts a great range of mammals and one of the world’s largest seasonal ungulate movements, with over 1.3 wildebeest and several hundreds of thousands of zebras and antelopes migrating through the region in a regular pattern. While climatic and biological drivers for this migration have been studied in great detail, the role of rock chemistry, weathering and resulting soil diversity as a source for nutrient provision has so far been largely neglected and needs detailed and systematic study.</p><p>Geological processes provide important controls on long-term ecosystem dynamics. Volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and rock weathering influence soil edaphic properties, which represent the ability of soils to provide vital plant-available nutrients, which therefore control grazing patterns of herbivores, particularly during birthing and lactating seasons. Studying the geological role in providing and distributing essential nutrients is critical to understand long-term drivers and stability of animal migrations in dynamic ecosystems. We have carried out a field reconnaissance study in the Serengeti National Park, with the aim to study variations in nutrient variability in soils and vegetation in relation to the chemical composition of soil parent material, i.e. volcanic or metamorphic rocks and sediments derived from those rock units, and under consideration of climatic variations. First results show that the Serengeti ecosystem can be subdivided into three geo-edaphic subregions that correlate with seasonal wildebeest grazing habitats.</p><p>(1) The southeastern Serengeti (wet-season grazing), is characterized by soils developed on volcanic ash derived from recent eruptions of the Ol Doinjo Lengai carbonatite volcano. Here, we have identified deeper organic-rich soils with andic and vitric properties and varying amounts of carbonate concretions or near-surface calcrete horizons. High Na, K, and Ca levels of volcanic ashes suggest high levels of those elements in soils and vegetation in this region, also because the precipitation is lowest in this area.</p><p>(2) In the central Serengeti (short-term transitional grazing), soils develop on Archean basement rocks including granitic gneisses, phyllites and banded iron formations. Geochemical signatures of these rock types suggest that soils in this region have lower levels in Ca, Mg, and plant available P, compared to the SE Serengeti, which is supported by the transitional nature of this grazing habitat.</p><p>(3) Soils in the Northern Serengeti (dry-season grazing) develop on a diverse patchwork of Archean basement rocks as well as basaltic lavas and thick fluvial deposits. North of Mara river, the Insuria fault – a large normal fault of the East African Rift  - creates a wide sedimentary basin dominated by soils developed on basaltic sediments. Here, higher precipitation leads to stronger weathering and leaching of nutrient elements.</p><p>Our preliminary results suggests that geochemical variations together with continuous (syngenetic) pedogenesis through active volcanism or tectonic faulting and related fault scarp erosion created regions of high edaphic quality in the north and southeast of the Serengeti ecosystem, and that the patchy nature of soil edaphics is important to understand the underlying drivers of large scale migration of grazing animals in this region. </p>


Author(s):  
Lee J. Hartley ◽  
Martin James ◽  
Peter Jackson ◽  
Matt Couch ◽  
John Shevelan

The Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) is the UK’s principal facility for the disposal of solid low-level radioactive waste and is operated by LLW Repository Limited. Presently, LLWR Ltd is establishing the long-term environmental safety of disposals of solid radioactive waste at the LLWR, through the submission of the 2011 Environmental Safety Case for the LLWR. This Environmental Safety Case addresses the Environment Agency Guidance on Requirements for Authorisation. Aspects of the submission consider improved vault design, closure design, and quantitative assessments. Each of these issues requires an understanding of the movement of water through the facility and the surrounding geology during operations and following facility closure. Groundwater flow modelling has been used extensively in support of the interpretation of field investigations, the development of the engineering design, and an assessment of the groundwater pathway as one of the major pathways by which contaminants may reach the environment. This paper describes these important aspects of the Environmental Safety Case. The geological environment in the region of the LLWR consists of Quaternary age deposits overlying older bedrock. The facility involves shallow excavations into the Quaternary deposits, originally for trenches, with disposals to a vault system beginning in 1988. In the post-closure phase these disposals are covered by a cap and surrounded by a cut-off wall to minimise the water flow around or through the waste. An innovative modelling methodology has been developed to represent the range of scales that have to be considered from the regional groundwater flow patterns over several kilometres, the scale of tens of metres around the immediate site area, and down to about 1 metre for details of flows within the repository itself in three dimensions. Detailed finite-element models of the flow through geological media and the engineered features are used to interpret site data and assess a credible set of post-closure situations and model cases. In the radiological assessment, a more simplified compartment model is used to assess uncertainties in hydrogeological properties and the long-term evolution of the engineered barriers. Together the approach provides flexible tools for understanding and assessing a comprehensive range of aspects including details of flows within the repository, dilution and migration in the external geology, the long-term evolution of the hydrogeological system, the implications of spatial variability and alternative geological models, and effects of uncertainties.


2003 ◽  
Vol 807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gens ◽  
Philippe Lalieux ◽  
Peter De Preter ◽  
Ann Dierckx ◽  
Johan Bel ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTONDRAF/NIRAS – the Belgian radioactive waste management agency – has published in 2001 the SAFIR 2 report on request of the authorities. The SAFIR 2 report is to be considered as a state-of-the art report and not as a complete safety case. This report gives an overview of the Belgian R&D program related to the geological disposal of HLW and ILW for the period 1990–2000 in the Boom Clay (reference host rock). The three main outcomes of the SAFIR 2 report on which this paper will be more specifically focusing, are the following (including results reported after 2000): long-term safety functions, confirmation of the role of the Boom Clay formation as the main barrier and identification of practical difficulties with respect to technical feasibility (repository design).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document