scholarly journals Biological Materials Science: Biological Materials, Bioinspired Materials, and Biomaterials Marc André Meyers and Po-Yu Chen

MRS Bulletin ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 612-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Andre Meyers ◽  
Po-Yun Chen

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 665-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Wysokowski ◽  
Teofil Jesionowski ◽  
Hermann Ehrlich

JOM ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Nychka ◽  
Molly M. Gentleman

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Meyers ◽  
Po-Yu Chen ◽  
Maria I. Lopez ◽  
Yasuaki Seki ◽  
Albert Y.M. Lin

Author(s):  
Joanna Tsenn ◽  
Julie S. Linsey ◽  
Daniel A. McAdams

Natural materials are able to achieve a wide range and combination of properties through the arrangement of the material’s components. These biological materials are often more effective and better suited to their function than engineered materials, even with the use of a limited set of components. By mimicking a biological material’s component arrangement, or structure, man-made bioinspired materials can achieve improved properties as well. While considerable research has been conducted on biological materials, identifying the beneficial structural design principles can be time-intensive for a materials designer. Previously, a text mining algorithm and tool were developed to quickly extract passages describing property-specific structural design principles from a corpus of materials journals. Although the tool identified over 90% of the principles (recall), many irrelevant passages were returned as well with approximately 32% of the passages being useful (precision). This paper discusses approaches to refine the program in order to improve precision. The text classification techniques of machine learning classifiers, statistical features, and part-of-speech analyses, are evaluated for effectiveness in sorting passages into relevant and irrelevant classes. Manual identification of patterns in the returned passages is also employed to create a rule-based method, resulting in an updated algorithm. An evaluation comparing the revised algorithm to the previously developed algorithm is completed using a new set of journal articles. Although the revised algorithm’s recall was reduced to 80%, the precision increased to 45% and the number of returned passages was reduced by 22%, allowing a materials designer to more quickly identify potentially useful structures. The paper concludes with suggestions to improve the program’s usefulness and scope for future work.


2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-288
Author(s):  
A HODGE ◽  
M MEYERS ◽  
C LIM ◽  
R LESAR

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 713-715
Author(s):  
John A. Nychka ◽  
Jamie J. Kruzic ◽  
Amit Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Mehmet Sarikaya

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document