scholarly journals Az edoxabán véralvadásgátló hatásossága és biztonságossága nonvalvuláris pitvarfibrillációban

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (12) ◽  
pp. 466-469
Author(s):  
Andrea Szegedi ◽  
Zoltán Csanádi
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Anticoagulant Drugs

Abstract: The significantly increased incidence of stroke and systemic embolisation caused by atrial fibrillation can be prevented by adequately adjusted anticoagulant therapy. Vitamin K antagonists effectively decrease the risk of thromboembolic events but this effect is influenced by many factors. The development of the new direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOAC) in the last few years provided new opportunities for us to choose the suitable anticoagulant therapy. According to the results of the ENGAGE AF–TIMI 48 and ENSURE-AF multicenter, randomized trials, edoxaban, the recently introduced DOAC is equally effective as the traditional coumarin therapy, nevertheless, it ensures more tolerable anticoagulation for patients suffering from non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(12): 466–469.

Stroke Prevention by Anticoagulants in Daily Practice Depending on Atrial Fibrillation Pattern and Clinical Risk Factors

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda ◽  
Jean-Yves Le Heuzey ◽  
Jean Ferrières ◽  
Didier Leys ◽  
Jean-Marc Davy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Clinical Risk Factors ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant

Background and Purpose: The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of individual direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for primary prevention of stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) in routine clinical practice in patients with various clinical risk factors depending on their atrial fibrillation (AF) patterns. Methods: A nested case-referent study was conducted using data from 2 national registries of patients with stroke and AF. Stroke cases with previous history of AF were matched to up to 2 randomly selected referent patients with AF and no stroke. The association of individual anticoagulant use with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke was studied in patients with or without permanent AF using multivariable conditional logistic models, controlled for clinically significant risk factors and multiple other cardiovascular risk factors. Results: In total, 2586 stroke cases with previous AF and 4810 nonstroke referent patients with AF were retained for the study. Direct oral anticoagulant users had lower odds of stroke of any type than vitamin K antagonist users: the adjusted-matched OR for ischemic stroke were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50–0.98) for dabigatran, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53–0.86) for rivaroxaban, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.52–1.02) for apixaban while for hemorrhagic stroke they were 0.31 (95% CI, 0.14–0.68), 0.64 (95% CI, 0.39–1.06), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.33–1.49), respectively. The effects of individual direct oral anticoagulants relative to vitamin K antagonists were similar in permanent AF and nonpermanent AF patients. Conclusions: Similar results were observed for each direct oral anticoagulant in real life as those observed in the pivotal clinical trials. The pattern of AF did not affect the outcome.

Stroke severity in patients with preceding direct oral anticoagulant therapy as compared to vitamin K antagonists

2019 ◽  
Vol 266 (9) ◽  
pp. 2263-2272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Auer ◽  
Sebastién Frey ◽  
Johannes Kaesmacher ◽  
Arsany Hakim ◽  
David J. Seiffge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant

scholarly journals Uninterrupted or Minimally Interrupted Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy is a Safe Alternative to Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3073
Author(s):  
Máté Ottóffy ◽  
Péter Mátrai ◽  
Nelli Farkas ◽  
Péter Hegyi ◽  
László Czopf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Life Threatening

Adequate anticoagulation during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for the prevention of both thromboembolic events and life-threatening bleeding. The purpose of this updated meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted and minimally interrupted periprocedural direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) protocols and uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in patients undergoing CA for AF based on the latest evidence. Randomized controlled trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective registries comparing DOACs to VKAs were identified in multiple databases (Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus). The primary outcomes were stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, and net clinical benefit. Forty-two studies with a total of 22,715 patients were included in the final analysis. The occurrence of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients assigned to uninterrupted DOAC treatment compared to VKAs (pooled odds ratio (POR): 0.71, confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.99). The pooled analysis of both uninterrupted and minimally interrupted DOAC groups also showed significant reduction in major bleeding events (POR: 0.70, CI: 0.53–0.93). The incidence of thromboembolic events was low, with no significant difference between groups. This updated meta-analysis showed that DOAC therapy is as effective as VKA in preventing stroke and TIA. Minimally interrupted DOAC therapy is a non-inferior periprocedural anticoagulation strategy; however, uninterrupted DOAC therapy showed superiority compared to VKA with regard to major, life-threatening bleeding. Based on our in-depth analysis, we conclude that both DOAC strategies are equally safe and preferable alternatives to VKAs in patients undergoing CA for AF.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation Cardioversion: What Is Crucial to Take into Account

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3212
Author(s):  
Fabiana Lucà ◽  
Simona Giubilato ◽  
Stefania Angela Di Fusco ◽  
Laura Piccioni ◽  
Carmelo Massimiliano Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Significant Advance ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Thromboembolic Risk ◽  
Pharmacological Cardioversion

The therapeutic dilemma between rhythm and rate control in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is still unresolved and electrical or pharmacological cardioversion (CV) frequently represents a useful strategy. The most recent guidelines recommend anticoagulation according to individual thromboembolic risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been routinely used to prevent thromboembolic events. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent a significant advance due to their more predictable therapeutic effect and more favorable hemorrhagic risk profile. In hemodynamically unstable patients, an emergency electrical cardioversion (ECV) must be performed. In this situation, intravenous heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) should be administered before CV. In patients with AF occurring within less than 48 h, synchronized direct ECV should be the elective procedure, as it restores sinus rhythm quicker and more successfully than pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) and is associated with shorter length of hospitalization. Patients with acute onset AF were traditionally considered at lower risk of thromboembolic events due to the shorter time for atrial thrombus formation. In patients with hemodynamic stability and AF for more than 48 h, an ECV should be planned after at least 3 weeks of anticoagulation therapy. Alternatively, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) should be performed, followed by ECV and anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks. Theoretically, the standardized use of TEE before CV allows a better stratification of thromboembolic risk, although data available to date are not univocal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document