scholarly journals Így kezeljük az autológ őssejt-transzplantáció után kiújult Hodgkin-lymphomát

2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (34) ◽  
pp. 1338-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Zsófia Simon ◽  
Miklós Udvardy ◽  
Ferenc Magyari ◽  
Ádám Jóna ◽  
...  

Abstract: Approximately 10–30% of Hodgkin lymphoma patients relapses or experience refractory disease after first line treatment. Nowadays, autologous stem cell transplantation can successfully salvage half of these patients, median overall survival is only 2–2.5 years. Several prognostic factors determine success of autologous stem cell transplantation. Result of transplantation can be improved considering these factors and using consolidation treatment, if necessary. Patients who relapse after autologous transplantation had worse prognosis, treatment of this patient population is unmet clinical need. Several new treatment options became available in the recent years (brentuximab vedotin and immuncheckpoint inhibitors). These new treatment options offer more chance for cure in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin patients. Outcome of allogenic stem cell transplantation can be improved by using haploidentical donors. New therapeutic options will be discussed in this review. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(34): 1338–1345.

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2031-2031
Author(s):  
Melhem M. Solh ◽  
Tori Smith ◽  
Yasser Khaled ◽  
Alicja Copik

Abstract Introduction Plerixafor is a reversible CXCR4 antagonist that has been approved by the food and drug administration for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients mobilized with Plerixafor were shown to have a higher proportion of primitive stem cells (CD34+/CD133+/CD38-), CD4+ T cells and Natural killer cells (CD3-/CD16+/CD56+) in the graft composition when compared to patients mobilized with chemotherapy plus G-CSF alone .We investigated the effect of Plerixafor on immune reconstitution at thirty and sixty days post autologous stem cell transplantation. Methods Patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation were enrolled on a single arm prospective immune reconstitution trial. A complete blood count, differential and lymphocyte flow cytometry panel (T cell, NK cell and B cell markers) was checked on Days 30 and 60 post autologous transplantation. Stem cell mobilization was carried per our institutional standards. All patients received subcutaneous G-CSF at a dose of 10 µg per kilogram body weight for four consecutive days. On Day4, patient with a peripheral CD34 count of ≤20/µl received plerixafor 0.24mg/kg. Collection was started on day 5 and continued till collection goal was reached or patient failed to get the minimal cell dose after 4 consecutive days of aphaeresis. Results 49 patients were enrolled during the period from September 2010 till May 2012. Median age at time of transplantation was 54 years (range 21; 72 years). 35 patients had multiple myeloma and 14 had non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 16 patients received GCSF alone (group A) and 33 had plerixafor plus GCSF (group B) for mobilization. All patients achieved the minimum target of CD34 collection. The mean number of collection days was 1.9 and 1.4 days (p=0.05) with a total collection dose of 7.76 and 7.61 CD34 x106/Kg for groups A and B respectively. The percentage proportion of CD34 in the aphaeresis product was 0.73% and 0.75% (p=0.9) for group A and B. Total infused CD34 dose was similar in both groups (4.88 and 4.56 CD34x106/kg) with time to engraftment of 11.68 vs 11.69 days for neutrophils and 20.62 vs 21.39 for platelets in groups A and B respectively. There was no difference between day 30 absolute lymphocyte count (1.09 vs 1.44 x103/mm3 p=0.18); Absolute NK cell (0.31 vs 0.35 x103/µl; p=0.51); absolute T cell count (0.71 vs 0.96 x103/µl p=0.33) and absolute neutrophil count (2.98 vs 2.63 x103/mm3 p=0.37). The cell count recovery was also not significantly different when analyzed per disease (myeloma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) and at day 60. Conclusion Our study shows that patient mobilized with plerixafor and G-CSF have similar immune reconstitution at 30 and 60 days post autologous transplantation compared to patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 793-793
Author(s):  
Guillermo F. Sanz ◽  
Armando V. Mena-Duran ◽  
Jose M. Ribera ◽  
Teresa Bernal ◽  
Luis Palomera ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. AML conventional chemotherapy followed or not by autologous stem cell transplantation could be curative for high risk MDS and sAML. Aim. To evaluate outcome in 103 patients enrolled in PETHEMA’s FLAG-IDA protocol achieving complete remission (CR) followed by intensive chemotherapy and autologous transplantation compared to those with no further treatment. Patients and methods. 103 patients were recruited from 15 institutions starting December 1997 till December 2004. Eligibility criteria: de novo MDS with Spanish score >2 and/or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) >1; or sAML. Induction chemotherapy was the FLAG-IDA regime (Fludarabine, cytarabine (ARA-C), idarubicin (IDA) and G-CSF). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) had consolidation chemotherapy with IDA+ARAC+G-CSF. Patients younger than 65 yrs old who mobilized enough hematopoietic progenitors proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation. Poor mobilizers were treated further either with allogeneic transplantation, if an appropriate donor was available, or with carboplatin (CBDCA) intensification. For patients older than 65 yrs CBDCA intensification was the only therapeutic option. Results. Patients had a median age of 62 yr (range, 17–79) with a M:F ratio of 2.4:1. According to FAB classification, 2 patients had refractory anemia (RA), 1 had refractory anemia with ringed sideroblastos (RARS), 37 had refractory anemia with excess of blasts (RAEB), 23 had RAEB in transformation (RAEB-t) and 40 (39%) had sAML. Unfavorable cytogenetics according to the IPSS was found in 46 patients (45%). According to IPSS (if suitable), 9 patients were Intermediate-1, 21 Intermediate-2 and 23 were high-risk. According to the Spanish score, 3 patients had low-risk, 29 had intermediate-risk and 31 had high-risk. Sixty-six patients (64%) achieved CR and 37 patients (46%) failed (13 patients achieved partial remission; 12 had refractory disease and 12 patients died in aplasia). No variable correlated with the achievement of CR. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 1–80), 31 patients remained alive in continuous CR. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 11 months (range, 2–59) and the projected 3-year EFS was 29% (95% CI, 14–44). Multivariate analysis for EFS revealed poor-risk cytogenetics according to IPSS (P=0.005) as the only independent prognostic factor associated with relapse or death. Actuarial median and 3-year EFS for the 23 patients who proceeded to autologous transplantation were 10 months and 34%, not clearly different to the 10 months and 22% observed for the 35 patients treated with chemotherapy alone (P=0.67). Conclusions. CR rate after FLAG-IDA induction chemotherapy for patients with MDS is as high as that achieved with standard chemotherapy regimes in elderly patients with AML, but treatment-related toxicity remains a serious threat. Autologous stem cell transplantation did not provide any advantage in terms of EFS in comparison with chemotherapy alone in high risk MDS or sAML. These results in a homogeneous population of patients with MDS strongly disagree with those previously reported by the EBMT group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document