scholarly journals What is the Impact of the Proportion of Solid Necrotic Content on the Number of Necrosectomies during EUS-Guided Drainage using Lumen-Apposing Metallic Stents of Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis ?

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-628
Author(s):  
Andrada Seicean ◽  
Cristina Pojoga ◽  
Ofelia Mostean ◽  
Sorana Bolboaca ◽  
Madalina Ilie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
Endoscopic Necrosectomy ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
One Step ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis ◽  
The Impact

Background and Aims: The fully-covered, lumen apposing metal stents are designed for one step placement, facilitating the direct endoscopic necrosectomy into the walled-off pancreatic necrosis. However, the prediction of the number of necrosectomy sessions in these patients is not known. This study evaluated the association between the proportion of solid necrotic material inside walled-off necrosis, as assessed during the endosonography placement of a lumen apposing metal stent, and the number of necrosectomies subsequently required. Methods: Patients from three tertiary medical centers with symptomatic walled off pancreatic necrosis (pain, infection, gastric/biliary obstruction) at more than 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis were retrospectively analysed. Proportion of solid necrotic debris was estimated during endosonography procedure of lumen apposing metal stents placement. Necrosectomy was performed when obstruction or inflammation occurred subsequently. Lumen apposing metal stents were removed after clearance of necrotic content. Results: In 46 patients with successful lumen apposing metal stents placement, necrosectomy was performed in 39 patients (72.78%). Performance of 3 or more necrosectomies was significantly associated with more than 50% pancreatic necrosis (p=0.032), but not with walled-off pancreatic necrosis size or location. Necrotic infection during lumen apposing metal stents stenting was associated with hypoalbuminemia, but not with necrosectomy requirement. Clinical success after a median follow-up of 13.37 months was 87%. Conclusions: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis with more than 50% solid necrotic content were associated with more necrosectomy procedures, requiering longer endoscopy time, intravenous sedations, and higher costs.

scholarly journals Direct endoscopic necrosectomy in infected pancreatic necrosis using lumen-apposing metal stents: Early intervention does not compromise outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. E490-E495
Author(s):  
David Albers ◽  
Alexander Meining ◽  
Alexander Hann ◽  
Younan Kabara Ayoub ◽  
Brigitte Schumacher
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Infected Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Endoscopic Necrosectomy ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Infection of pancreatic necrosis is a dreaded complication requiring an intervention. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. This retrospective two-center study evaluated direct endoscopic necrosectomy using lumen apposing metal stents in case of proven or suspected infected pancreatic necrosis in an early stage of the disease. Patients and methods Forty-nine patients with infected pancreatic necrosis were included. Sequent direct endoscopic necrosectomies after lumen apposing metal stent insertion (LAMS) were performed until the resolution of necrosis. In all patients, the first endoscopic intervention was performed within the first 30 days after first proof of pancreatic necrosis. Primary outcome parameters were inflammatory activity, days spent in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and mortality. Results The patient cohort received median 4 necrosectomies (3–5) after a median of 7 days (3–11) after first proof of pancreatic necrosis. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 98.3 % and 87.8 %, respectively; the mortality rate was 8.2 %. The median C-reactive protein level decreased from 241 mg/L (182.9–288.9) before the intervention to a median of 23.3 mg/L (18–60) after therapy. The median time period in the ICU was 5 days (3–9). Conclusions Early endoscopic therapy in the form of direct endoscopic necrosectomy after LAMS placement within the first 30 days after proof of pancreatic necrosis is effective and does not result in poor outcome. Our retrospective data suggest that early intervention before walled-off necrosis is formed is tenable when it is essential due to the patient's clinical deterioration.

scholarly journals Endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis by large-bore percutaneus metal stent: a new opportunity?

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. E274-E278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tringali ◽  
Salvatore Vadalà di Prampero ◽  
Vincenzo Bove ◽  
Vincenzo Perri ◽  
Antonio La Greca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Duodenal Wall ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Endoscopic Drainage ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
Percutaneous Approach ◽  
Endoscopic Necrosectomy

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is feasible when contact with the gastric or duodenal wall is present; when WOPN cannot be accessed endoscopically, a percutaneous approach can be considered. Percutaneous use of esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to establish access to a WOPN cavity was evaluated.

scholarly journals A comparison of outcomes between a lumen-apposing metal stent with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system and a bi-flanged metal stent for drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (12) ◽  
pp. E1189-E1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noor Bekkali ◽  
Manu Nayar ◽  
John Leeds ◽  
Richard Charnley ◽  
Matthew Huggett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Delivery System ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
End Point ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background and study aims Bi-flanged metal stents (BFMS) have shown promise in the drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), but their placement requires multiple steps and the use of other devices. More recently, a novel device consisting of a combined lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and electrocautery-enhanced delivery system has been introduced. The aim of this study was to compare the placement and outcomes of the two devices. Patients and methods This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of BFMS or LAMS for drainage of symptomatic WON. Data from procedures between October 2012 and December 2016 were taken from a prospectively maintained database. We compared technical and clinical success, procedure time, costs, and composite end point of significant events (adverse events, stent migration, additional percutaneous drainage) between BFMS and LAMS. Results 72 consecutive patients underwent placement of BFMS (40 patients, 44 stents) or LAMS (32 patients, 33 stents). Technical success was 91 % for BFMS and 97 % for LAMS. Clinical success was 65 % vs. 78 %, respectively. Median in-room procedure time was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (45 minutes [range 30 – 80]) than in the BFMS group (62.5 minutes [range 35 – 135]; P < 0.001) and fewer direct endoscopic necrosectomies (DEN) were performed (median 1 [0 – 2.0] vs. 2 [0 – 3.7], respectively; P = 0.005). If only inpatients were considered (35 BFMS and 19 LAMS), there was no significant difference in DEN 2 (range 0 – 11) and 2 (range 0 – 8), respectively. The composite end point of 32 % vs. 24 % was not significantly different. Median procedural costs for all patients with successful stent placement for WON treatment was €4427 (range 1630 – 12 926) for BFMS vs. €3500 (range 2509 – 13 393) for LAMS (P = 0.10). Conclusion LAMS was superior to BFMS in terms of procedure time, with comparable adverse events, success, and costs.

scholarly journals Safety and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for malignant biliary obstruction using cautery-enabled lumen-apposing metal stent

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (11) ◽  
pp. E1633-E1638
Author(s):  
Jerry Yung-Lun Chin ◽  
Samir Seleq ◽  
Frank Weilert
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Stent Occlusion ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Background and study aims There is increasing evidence to suggest that EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a safe and effective treatment alternative for patients with malignant biliary obstructions (MBOs) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected from patients with MBO who underwent choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) or gallbladder drainage (GBD) between August 2016 and June 2020 using the electrocautery-enabled lumen-apposing metal stents (ECE-LAMS). The primary endpoint was technical and clinical success. Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and reinterventions. Results A total of 60 patients were included in the study, with 56 CDS and 4 GBD. Median age was 76 years with 57 % male (34/60). The most common indication for EUS-BD was pancreatic cancer (78 %). Technical success was achieved in 100 % of cases, with a clinical success rate of 91.7 %. Mean total bilirubin pre-procedure was 202 umol/L (normal < 20 umol/L) and 63.8 umol/L post procedure (P < .001). Twenty-one patients had bilirubin recorded at 2 weeks post EUS-BD with 20 of 21 patients demonstrating > 50 % reduction in bilirubin (mean bilirubin reduction 75 %). AEs occurred in 12 of 60 patients (20 %), all of which were mild. The reintervention rate was 11.7 % (7/60). Stent occlusion occurred in 10 of 60 patients (16.7 %) with a mean time to stent occlusion of 46.2 days (3–133). Stent patency of 83.3 % was observed with a mean follow up of 7.9 months. Conclusion EUS-CDS and GBD using ECE-LAMS are effective EUS-based techniques for managing patients with MBO. AEs are usually mild and resolved by reintervention.

scholarly journals Self-Expanding Metal Stenting for Palliation of Patients with Malignant Colonic Obstruction: Effectiveness and Efficacy on 255 Patients with 12-Month's Follow-up

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Meisner ◽  
Ferran González-Huix ◽  
Jo G. Vandervoort ◽  
Alessandro Repici ◽  
Dimitrios Xinopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Placement ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Malignant Colonic Obstruction ◽  
Procedural Success

Background. Self-expanding metal stents can alleviate malignant colonic obstruction in incurable patients and avoid palliative stoma surgery.Objective. Evaluate stent effectiveness and safety on palliation of patients with malignant colorectal strictures.Design. Two prospective, one Spanish and one global, multicenter studies.Settings. 39 centers (22 academic, 17 community hospitals) from 13 countries.Patients. A total of 257 patients were enrolled, and 255 patients were treated with a WallFlex uncovered enteral colonic stent. Follow-up was up to 12 months or until death or retreatment.Interventions(s). Self-expanding metal stent placement.Main Outcome Measures. Procedural success, clinical success, and safety.Results. Procedural success was 98.4% (251). Clinical success rates were 87.8% at 30 days, 89.7% at 3 months, 92.8% at 6 months, and 96% at 12 months. Overall perforation rate was 5.1%. Overall migration rate was 5.5%. Overall death rate during follow-up was 48.6% (124), with 67.7% of deaths related to the patient’s colorectal cancer, unrelated in 32.3%. Only 2 deaths were related to the stent or procedure.Limitations. No control group.Conclusions. The primary palliative option for patients with malignant colonic obstruction should be self-expanding metal stent placement due to high rates of technical success and efficacy in symptom palliation and few complications.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis using 20-mm versus 15-mm lumen-apposing metal stents: an international, multicenter, case-matched study

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasim Parsa ◽  
Jose M. Nieto ◽  
Patrick Powers ◽  
Shuji Mitsuhashi ◽  
Abdelhai Abdelqader ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Endoscopic Necrosectomy ◽  
Matched Study ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

Abstract Backgrounds Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has gained popularity for the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). We compared the 20-mm and 15-mm LAMSs for the treatment of symptomatic WON in terms of clinical success and adverse events. Methods We conducted a retrospective, case-matched study of 306 adults at 22 tertiary centers from 04/2014 to 10/2018. A total of 102 patients with symptomatic WON who underwent drainage with 20-mm LAMS (cases) and 204 patients who underwent drainage with 15-mm LAMS (controls) were matched by age, sex, and drainage approach. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to compare clinical success (resolution of WON on follow-up imaging without reintervention) and adverse events (according to American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria). Results Clinical success was achieved in 92.2 % of patients with 20-mm LAMS and 91.7 % of patients with 15-mm LAMS (odds ratio 0.92; P = 0.91). Patients with 20-mm LAMS underwent fewer direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) sessions (mean 1.3 vs. 2.1; P < 0.001), despite having larger WON collections (transverse axis 118.2 vs. 101.9 mm, P = 0.003; anteroposterior axis 95.9 vs. 80.1 mm, P = 0.01). There was no difference in overall adverse events (21.6 % vs. 15.2 %; P = 0.72) and bleeding events (4.9 % vs. 3.4 %; P = 0.54) between the 20-mm and 15-mm LAMS groups, respectively. Conclusions The 20-mm LAMS showed comparable clinical success and safety profile to the 15-mm LAMS, with the need for fewer DEN sessions for WON resolution.

scholarly journals Lumen apposing metal stents are superior to plastic stents in pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a large international multicenter study

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. E347-E354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-I Chen ◽  
Juliana Yang ◽  
Shai Friedland ◽  
Ian Holmes ◽  
Ryan Law ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Transmural Drainage ◽  
International Multicenter Study ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis ◽  
International Multicenter

Abstract Background and study aims The use of lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) during EUS-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) has gained popularity. Data supporting their use in WON over plastic stents (PS), however, remain scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of LAMS (Axios, Boston Scientific) with PS in WON. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study involving 14 centers. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TD of WON (2012 – 2016) were included. The primary end point was clinical success defined as WON size ≤ 3 cm within a 6-month period without need for percutaneous drainage (PCD) or surgery. Results A total of 189 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 15.6 years, 34.9 % female) were included (102 LAMS and 87 PS). Technical success rates were similar: 100 % in LAMS and 98.9 % in PS (P = 0.28). Clinical success was attained in 80.4 % of LAMS and 57.5 % of PS (P = 0.001). Rate of PCD was similar (13.7 % LAMS vs. 16.3 % PS, P = 0.62), while PS was associated with a greater need for surgery (16.1 % PS vs. 5.6 % LAMS, P = 0.02). Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 9.8 % of LAMS and 10.3 % of PS (P = 0.90) and were rated as severe in 2.0 % and 6.9 %, respectively (P = 0.93). After excluding patients with < 6 months follow-up, the rate of WON recurrence following initial clinical success was greater with PS (22.9 % PS vs. 5.6 % LAMS, P = 0.04). Conclusions When compared to PS, LAMS in WON is associated with higher clinical success, shorter procedure time, lower need for surgery, and lower rate of recurrence.

scholarly journals Management of walled-off necrosis with nasocystic irrigation with hydrogen peroxide versus biflanged metal stent: randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (07) ◽  
pp. E1108-E1115
Author(s):  
Sudhir Maharshi ◽  
Shyam Sunder Sharma ◽  
Sandeep Ratra ◽  
Bharat Sapra ◽  
Dhruv Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Metal Stent ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a known complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). There is no study comparing nasocystic irrigation with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) versus biflanged metal stent (BMS) in the management of WON. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of both the treatment strategies. Patients and methods This study was conducted on patients with symptomatic WON who were randomized to nasocystic irrigation with H2O2 (Group A) and BMS placement (Group B). Primary outcomes were clinical and technical success while secondary outcomes were procedure time, adverse events, need for additional procedures, duration of hospitalization, and mortality. Results Fifty patients were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 25, age 37.8 ± 17.6 years, 16 men) and Group B (n = 25, age 41.8 ± 15.2 years, 17 men). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The most common etiology of pancreatitis was alcohol, observed in 27 (54 %) patients. Technical success (100 % vs 96 %, P = 0.98), clinical success (84 % vs 76 %, P = 0.76), requirement of additional procedures (16 % vs 24 %, P = 0.70) and adverse events (4 vs 7, P = 0.06) were comparable in both the groups. The duration to clinical success (34.4 ± 12 vs 14.8 ± 10.8 days, P = 0.001) and procedure time (36 ± 15 vs 18 ± 12 minutes, P = 0.01) were longer in Group A compared to Group B. Conclusions Nasocystic irrigation with H2O2 and BMS are equally effective in the management of WON but time to clinical success and procedure time is longer with nasocystic irrigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document