scholarly journals Cirrhosis Risk Score of the Donor Organ Predicts Early Fibrosis Progression after Liver Transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
Anca Zimmermann ◽  
Felix Darstein ◽  
Maria Hoppe-Lotichius ◽  
Gerrit Toenges ◽  
Anja Lautem ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Fibrosis progression (FP) after liver transplantation (LT) increases morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers are needed for early prediction of FP. A recipient’s seven-gene cirrhosis risk score (CRS) has been associated with FP, especially in non-transplant cohorts. A broader validation of CRS, including the genotype of the donor-organ and HCV-negative patients is lacking. We therefore analyzed the impact of donor- and recipient-specific genotypes on FP after LT in a large cohort of HCV-positive and -negative patients.Method: Genotyping from liver biopsies (n=201 donors) and peripheral blood (n=442 recipients) was performed. Cirrhosis risk score was correlated with FP at 1 and 5 years after LT.Results: Fibrosis ≥F2 was documented in 26.5% of the recipients’ CRS group (R-CRS) (defined by recipient’s genotype) and in 23.4% of the donors’ CRS- group (D-CRS) (defined by donor’s genotype). Cumulative incidence for fibrosis ≥F2 was higher in patients with D-CRS >0.7 (p=0.03). While the R-CRS showed no prognostic relevance, D-CRS >0.7 was associated with higher hazard ratios (HRs) for fibrosis ≥F2 (HR=2.04; p=0.01), especially in HCV-negative patients (HR=2.59, p=0.03). Donors’ CRS >0.7 was associated with higher risk for ≥F2 in 1-year protocol biopsies (p<0.001). Among the patients in whom both the recipient’s and donor’s CRS were available, fibrosis ≥F2 was encountered more frequently in patients with a D-CRS >0.7, in combination with any R-CRS, compared to patients with D-CRS scores ≤0.7 (p=0.034). Donors’ AZIN1, STXBP5L, TRPM5 genotypes carried a higher risk for fibrosis ≥F2 in subgroups.Conclusion: High D-CRS >0.7 predicted early FP after LT, especially in HCV negative patients.

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. A125-A126
Author(s):  
E. De Martin ◽  
A. Gobbo ◽  
M. Senzolo ◽  
S. Boninsegna ◽  
M. Guido ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. A36
Author(s):  
E. De Martin ◽  
M. Senzolo ◽  
M. Boninsegna ◽  
S. Guido ◽  
M. Gambato ◽  
...  

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Markiewicz-Kijewska ◽  
Sylwia Szymańska ◽  
Michal Pyzlak ◽  
Piotr Kaliciński ◽  
Joanna Teisseyre ◽  
...  

Liver transplantation has become a routine treatment for children with end stage liver failure. Recently, the long term survival of pediatric patients after liver transplantation has improved, with a life expectancy much longer than that of adult recipients, but also with longer exposition of the graft to various injuries, including immunological, inflammatory and others. Biochemical tests, although important, do not always reflect graft injury. The aim of our study was to analyze the histopathology of the graft in late protocol biopsies and correlate it with the clinical and biochemical status of these patients. We analyzed 61 protocol liver biopsies taken from 61 patients. Biopsies were taken 9.03–17.09 years (mean 12.68, median 11.74 years) after transplantation. Liver specimens were examined particularly for the presence and stage of liver fibrosis, inflammation, steatosis, and acute or chronic cellular and humoral rejection. We did not find any abnormalities in 26 (42.6%) liver specimens. None of the patients had signs of cellular or antibody mediated rejection or chronic rejection. In 23 liver biopsies (37.7%), we found non-specific lymphoid infiltrates. Another problem was fibrosis (equal to or more than three on the Ishak scale)—we found it in 17 patients, including seven liver specimens (11.5%) with severe fibrosis (Ishak 5–6). Conclusions: Various pathomorphological abnormalities were found in more than half of patients with a median 11.74 years post-transplant follow-up. Most of them presented normal laboratory liver tests at the same time, suggesting a slow subclinical process leading to pathomorphological abnormalities. No single factor for the development of these abnormalities was found, but our study supports the need for protocol liver biopsies even in patients with normal/almost normal biochemical liver tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document