scholarly journals Partial cut elimination for propositional discrete linear time temporal logic

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jūratė Sakalauskaitė
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Canonical Model ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Sequent Calculi ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

We consider propositional discrete linear time temporal logic with future and past operators of time. For each formula ϕ of this logic, we present Gentzen-type sequent calculus Gr(ϕ) with a restricted cut rule. We sketch a proof of the soundness and the completeness of the sequent calculi presented. The completeness is proved via construction of a canonical model.

scholarly journals Partial cut elimination for combinations of propositional multi-modal logics with past time

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jūratė Sakalauskaitė
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Sequent Calculi ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Past Time ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

We consider combinations of nine propositional multi-modal logics with propositional discrete linear time temporal logic with past time. For these combinations, we present sound and complete Gentzen-type sequent calculi with a restricted cut rule.  

Verifying linear time temporal logic properties of concurrent Ada programs with quasar

2004 ◽  
Vol XXIV (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Evangelista ◽  
C. Kaiser ◽  
J. F. Pradat-Peyre ◽  
P. Rousseau
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

Vehicle route-sequence planning using temporal logic

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
KIAM TIAN SEOW ◽  
MICHEL PASQUIER
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Simple Procedure ◽  
Precedence Constraints ◽  
Sequence Planning ◽  
Vehicle Route ◽  
Passenger Travel ◽  
State Formula ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Service Task

This paper proposes a new logical framework for vehicle route-sequence planning of passenger travel requests. Each request is a fetch-and-send service task associated with two request-locations, namely, a source and a destination. The proposed framework is developed using propositional linear time temporal logic of Manna and Pnueli. The novelty lies in the use of the formal language for both the specification and theorem-proving analysis of precedence constraints among the location visits that are inherent in route sequences. In the framework, legal route sequences—each of which visits every request location once and only once in the precedence order of fetch-and-send associated with every such request—is formalized and justified, forming a basis upon which the link between a basic precedence constraint and the corresponding canonical forbidden-state formula is formally established. Over a given base route plan, a simple procedure to generate a feasible subplan based on a specification of the forbidden-state canonical form is also given. An example demonstrates how temporal logic analysis and the proposed procedure can be applied to select a final (feasible) subplan based on additional precedence constraints.

Ein Ansatz zur formalen Verifikation von Schaltungsbeschreibungen in SystemC (An Approach for Formal Verification of Circuits in SystemC)

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Große ◽  
Rolf Drechsler
Keyword(s):  
Formal Verification ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic

ZusammenfassungDer vorgestellte Ansatz ermöglicht es, für SystemC-Schaltkreisbeschreibungen, die über einer gegebenen Gatterbibliothek definiert sind, Eigenschaften zu beweisen (engl. property checking). Als Spezifikationssprache wird LTL (linear time temporal logic) verwendet. Für den Beweis einer LTL-Eigenschaft kann die Erfüllbarkeit einer Booleschen Funktion betrachtet werden, die aus der Eigenschaft und der Schaltkreisbeschreibung mittels symbolischer Methoden konstruiert wird. Im Gegensatz zu simulationsbasierten Ansätzen kann dabei Vollständigkeit gewährleistet werden. Anhand einer Fallstudie eines skalierbaren Arbiters wird die Effizienz des Beweisverfahrens untersucht.

scholarly journals Verifying Fault-Tolerance in Probabilistic Swarm Systems

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Lomuscio ◽  
Edoardo Pirovano
Keyword(s):  
Fault Tolerance ◽  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Decision Problem ◽  
Swarm Robotics ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Robotic Swarms ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Probabilistic Nature

We present a method for reasoning about fault-tolerance in unbounded robotic swarms. We introduce a novel semantics that accounts for the probabilistic nature of both the swarm and possible malfunctions, as well as the unbounded nature of swarm systems. We define and interpret a variant of probabilistic linear-time temporal logic on the resulting executions, including those arising from faulty behaviour by some of the agents in the swarm. We specify the decision problem of parameterised fault-tolerance, which concerns determining whether a probabilistic specification holds under possibly faulty behaviour. We outline a verification procedure that we implement and use to study a foraging protocol from swarm robotics, and report the experimental results obtained.

scholarly journals Dynamic Linear Time Temporal Logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper G. Henriksen ◽  
P. S. Thiagarajan
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Logic ◽  
Linear Time ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Simple Extension ◽  
Propositional Dynamic Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Time Semantics ◽  
Linear Time Temporal Logic ◽  
Obvious Manner

A simple extension of the propositional temporal logic of linear<br />time is proposed. The extension consists of strengthening the until<br />operator by indexing it with the regular programs of propositional<br />dynamic logic (PDL). It is shown that DLTL, the resulting logic, is<br />expressively equivalent to S1S, the monadic second-order theory<br />of omega-sequences. In fact a sublogic of DLTL which corresponds<br />to propositional dynamic logic with a linear time semantics is<br />already as expressive as S1S. We pin down in an obvious manner<br />the sublogic of DLTL which correponds to the first order fragment<br />of S1S. We show that DLTL has an exponential time decision<br />procedure. We also obtain an axiomatization of DLTL. Finally,<br />we point to some natural extensions of the approach presented<br />here for bringing together propositional dynamic and temporal<br />logics in a linear time setting.

The consistency of arithmetic

2021 ◽  
pp. 268-311
Author(s):  
Paolo Mancosu ◽  
Sergio Galvan ◽  
Richard Zach
Keyword(s):  
Simple Proof ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Cut Elimination ◽  
Successor Function ◽  
Cut Rule ◽  
Original Proof ◽  
First Order ◽  
Successive Elimination ◽  
Pure Logic ◽  
Classical Arithmetic

This chapter opens the part of the book that deals with ordinal proof theory. Here the systems of interest are not purely logical ones, but rather formalized versions of mathematical theories, and in particular the first-order version of classical arithmetic built on top of the sequent calculus. Classical arithmetic goes beyond pure logic in that it contains a number of specific axioms for, among other symbols, 0 and the successor function. In particular, it contains the rule of induction, which is the essential rule characterizing the natural numbers. Proving a cut-elimination theorem for this system is hopeless, but something analogous to the cut-elimination theorem can be obtained. Indeed, one can show that every proof of a sequent containing only atomic formulas can be transformed into a proof that only applies the cut rule to atomic formulas. Such proofs, which do not make use of the induction rule and which only concern sequents consisting of atomic formulas, are called simple. It is shown that simple proofs cannot be proofs of the empty sequent, i.e., of a contradiction. The process of transforming the original proof into a simple proof is quite involved and requires the successive elimination, among other things, of “complex” cuts and applications of the rules of induction. The chapter describes in some detail how this transformation works, working through a number of illustrative examples. However, the transformation on its own does not guarantee that the process will eventually terminate in a simple proof.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document