LONG-TERM PREDICTION FOR SEISMIC HAZARD FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1369-1380
Author(s):  
B.T. Kochkin ◽  
V.A. Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Waste Disposal ◽  
Radioactive Waste Disposal ◽  
Term Prediction ◽  
Long Term Prediction

Impact of microbial activity on the radioactive waste disposal: long term prediction of biocorrosion processes

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Libert ◽  
Marta Kerber Schütz ◽  
Loïc Esnault ◽  
Damien Féron ◽  
Olivier Bildstein
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Microbial Activity ◽  
Waste Disposal ◽  
Radioactive Waste Disposal ◽  
Term Prediction ◽  
Long Term Prediction

Development of Mathematical Models for Long-Term Prediction of Corrosion Behaviour of Carbon Steel Overpacks for Radioactive Waste Disposal

1996 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Hoch ◽  
A. Honda ◽  
F. M. Porter ◽  
S. M. Sharland ◽  
N. Taniguchi
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Waste Disposal ◽  
Corrosion Behaviour ◽  
Radioactive Waste Disposal ◽  
Cathodic Reaction ◽  
Term Prediction ◽  
Long Term Prediction

ABSTRACTMathematical models to enable long-term prediction of the corrosion behaviour of carbon steel overpacks for radioactive waste have been developed. An existing model of the growth of pits, implemented in the CAMLE software, has been extended and used to investigate the sensitivity of the predictions to input parameters, including cathodic reaction kinetics and the relative position of the anode and cathode. Predictions have also been made of the aeration period of the repository, during which localised corrosion is possible.

scholarly journals Source Term Development For Tritium at the Sheffield Disposal Site

1984 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Mackenzie ◽  
R. E. Barletta ◽  
J. F. Smalley ◽  
C. R. Kempf ◽  
R. E. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Waste Disposal ◽  
Source Term ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Radioactive Waste Disposal ◽  
Disposal Site ◽  
Waste Disposal Site ◽  
Groundwater Samples ◽  
Low Level Radioactive Waste

AbstractThe Sheffield low-level radioactive waste disposal site, which ceased operation in 1978, has been the focus of modeling efforts by the NRC for the purpose of predicting long-term site behavior. To provide the NRC with information required for its modeling effort, a study to define the source term for tritium in eight trenches at the Sheffield site has been undertaken. Tritium is of special interest since significant concentrations of the isotope have been found in groundwater samples taken at the site and at locations outside the original site boundary. Previous estimates of tritium site inventory at Sheffield are in wide disagreement. In this study, the tritium inventory in the eight trenches was estimated by reviewing the radioactive shipping records (RSRs) for waste buried in these trenches. It has been found that the tritium shipped for burial at the site was probably higher than previously estimated. In the eight trenches surveyed, which amount to roughly one half the total volume and activity buried at Sheffield, approximately 2350 Ci of tritium from non-fuel cycle sources were identified.

scholarly journals A tentative useful-for-all definition of “safety” in the context of radioactive waste disposal

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 195-196
Author(s):  
Stephan Hotzel
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Waste Management ◽  
Waste Disposal ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Radioactive Waste Disposal ◽  
National Programmes ◽  
Geological Repository ◽  
Safety Case ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract. Most, if not all, national programmes for radioactive waste management pledge their overall commitment to safety or – in the case of radioactive waste disposal – to long-term safety. Therefore, it may be somewhat surprising to find that the term “safety” is hardly defined in these programs. The same holds for some of the core international guidance literature on the deep geological repository (DGR) “safety case” concept. With respect to stakeholder concern over the safety of geological disposal, it seems, however, advisable to seek common ground in the understanding of the idea of “safety”. Hotzel and Schröder (2018) reviewed the most relevant international guidance literature for explicitly or implicitly provided definitions of “safety” in the context of radioactive waste disposal. Based on this study – and on the finding that a practical, useful-for-all definition of “safety” is not provided in the scanned literature – they developed a tentative dictionary-style definition of “safety” that is suitable for everyday use in the DGR context. In the current contribution I embed, expand and update the 2018 study at both ends: As an enhanced introduction to the 2018 study, I lay out a basic concept of “sound” glossary definitions, namely glossary definitions being both practical and correct (and what this means). The thesis is that sound glossary definitions can facilitate mutual understanding between different stakeholder groups. As an update to the actual proposal for the definition of “safety” from the Hotzel and Schröder (2018) paper, that was presented and discussed at the Waste Management Conference 2018, I review the latest international guidance literature and the stakeholder concerns raised at the 2018 conference in order to present a revised definition. As a seed of discussion, it may help to eventually expose possible mismatches in the base assumptions of safety experts and other stakeholders and thereby support meaningful communication.

NUMO-RMS: A Practical Requirements Management System for the Long-Term Management of the Deep Geological Disposal Project

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyoshi Ueda ◽  
Satoru Suzuki ◽  
Katsuhiko Ishiguro ◽  
Kiyoshi Oyamada ◽  
Shoko Yashio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Waste Disposal ◽  
Management System ◽  
Radioactive Waste Disposal ◽  
Development Work ◽  
Requirements Management ◽  
Geological Disposal ◽  
Case Research ◽  
Deep Geological Disposal

NUMO (Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan) has the responsibility for implementing deep geological disposal of high-level (HLW) and transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste from the Japanese nuclear programme. A formal Requirements Management System (RMS) is planned to efficiently and effectively support the computerised implementation of the management strategy and the methodology required to drive the step-wise siting processes, and the following repository operational phase. The RMS will help in the comprehensive management of the decision-making processes in the geological disposal project, in change management as the disposal system is optimised, in driving projects such as the R&D programme efficiently, and in maintaining structured records regarding past decisions, all of which lead to soundness of the project in terms of long-term continuity. The system is planned to have information handling and management functions using a database that includes the decisions/requirements in the programme under consideration, the way in which these are structured in terms of the decision-making process and other associated information. A two-year development programme is underway to develop and enhance an existing trial RMS to a practical system. Functions for change management, history management and association with the external timeline management system are being implemented in the system development work. The database format is being improved to accommodate the requirements management data relating to the facility design and to safety assessment of the deep geological repository. This paper will present an outline of the development work with examples to demonstrate the system’s practicality. In parallel with the system/database developments, a case research of the use of requirements management in radioactive waste disposal projects was undertaken to identify key issues in the development of an RMS for radioactive waste disposal and specify a number of use cases to guide the overall development of the system. The findings of the case research will also be shown in the paper to provide general information on the application of an RMS in a radioactive waste disposal programme, the difficulties of successful implementation and suggestions on how these difficulties can be overcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document