Organic aerosol in air of Siberia and the Arctic. Part 2. Vertical distribution

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Distribution ◽  
Organic Aerosol ◽  
The Arctic

The vertical distribution of thin features over the Arctic analysed from CALIPSO observations. Part I: Optically thin clouds

Tellus B ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhay Devasthale ◽  
Michael Tjernström ◽  
Karl-Göran Karlsson ◽  
Manu Anna Thomas ◽  
Colin Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Distribution ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Vertical Distribution

scholarly journals Arctic marine secondary organic aerosol contributes significantly to summertime particle size distributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 2787-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Croft ◽  
Randall V. Martin ◽  
W. Richard Leaitch ◽  
Julia Burkart ◽  
Rachel Y.-W. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Particle Size ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Secondary Organic Aerosol ◽  
Canadian Arctic ◽  
Particle Growth ◽  
Organic Aerosol ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Canadian Arctic Archipelago ◽  
Size Distributions ◽  
Fractional Error

Abstract. Summertime Arctic aerosol size distributions are strongly controlled by natural regional emissions. Within this context, we use a chemical transport model with size-resolved aerosol microphysics (GEOS-Chem-TOMAS) to interpret measurements of aerosol size distributions from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago during the summer of 2016, as part of the “NETwork on Climate and Aerosols: Addressing key uncertainties in Remote Canadian Environments” (NETCARE) project. Our simulations suggest that condensation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from precursor vapors emitted in the Arctic and near Arctic marine (ice-free seawater) regions plays a key role in particle growth events that shape the aerosol size distributions observed at Alert (82.5∘ N, 62.3∘ W), Eureka (80.1∘ N, 86.4∘ W), and along a NETCARE ship track within the Archipelago. We refer to this SOA as Arctic marine SOA (AMSOA) to reflect the Arctic marine-based and likely biogenic sources for the precursors of the condensing organic vapors. AMSOA from a simulated flux (500 µgm-2day-1, north of 50∘ N) of precursor vapors (with an assumed yield of unity) reduces the summertime particle size distribution model–observation mean fractional error 2- to 4-fold, relative to a simulation without this AMSOA. Particle growth due to the condensable organic vapor flux contributes strongly (30 %–50 %) to the simulated summertime-mean number of particles with diameters larger than 20 nm in the study region. This growth couples with ternary particle nucleation (sulfuric acid, ammonia, and water vapor) and biogenic sulfate condensation to account for more than 90 % of this simulated particle number, which represents a strong biogenic influence. The simulated fit to summertime size-distribution observations is further improved at Eureka and for the ship track by scaling up the nucleation rate by a factor of 100 to account for other particle precursors such as gas-phase iodine and/or amines and/or fragmenting primary particles that could be missing from our simulations. Additionally, the fits to the observed size distributions and total aerosol number concentrations for particles larger than 4 nm improve with the assumption that the AMSOA contains semi-volatile species: the model–observation mean fractional error is reduced 2- to 3-fold for the Alert and ship track size distributions. AMSOA accounts for about half of the simulated particle surface area and volume distributions in the summertime Canadian Arctic Archipelago, with climate-relevant simulated summertime pan-Arctic-mean top-of-the-atmosphere aerosol direct (−0.04 W m−2) and cloud-albedo indirect (−0.4 W m−2) radiative effects, which due to uncertainties are viewed as an order of magnitude estimate. Future work should focus on further understanding summertime Arctic sources of AMSOA.

scholarly journals Cloud vertical distribution from combined surface and space radar–lidar observations at two Arctic atmospheric observatories

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5973-5989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinghui Liu ◽  
Matthew D. Shupe ◽  
Zhien Wang ◽  
Gerald Mace
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Distribution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Active Sensors ◽  
Annual Cycles ◽  
Cloud Property ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Cloud Water Content ◽  
Vertical Distributions

Abstract. Detailed and accurate vertical distributions of cloud properties (such as cloud fraction, cloud phase, and cloud water content) and their changes are essential to accurately calculate the surface radiative flux and to depict the mean climate state. Surface and space-based active sensors including radar and lidar are ideal to provide this information because of their superior capability to detect clouds and retrieve cloud microphysical properties. In this study, we compare the annual cycles of cloud property vertical distributions from space-based active sensors and surface-based active sensors at two Arctic atmospheric observatories, Barrow and Eureka. Based on the comparisons, we identify the sensors' respective strengths and limitations, and develop a blended cloud property vertical distribution by combining both sets of observations. Results show that surface-based observations offer a more complete cloud property vertical distribution from the surface up to 11 km above mean sea level (a.m.s.l.) with limitations in the middle and high altitudes; the annual mean total cloud fraction from space-based observations shows 25–40 % fewer clouds below 0.5 km than from surface-based observations, and space-based observations also show much fewer ice clouds and mixed-phase clouds, and slightly more liquid clouds, from the surface to 1 km. In general, space-based observations show comparable cloud fractions between 1 and 2 km a.m.s.l., and larger cloud fractions above 2 km a.m.s.l. than from surface-based observations. A blended product combines the strengths of both products to provide a more reliable annual cycle of cloud property vertical distributions from the surface to 11 km a.m.s.l. This information can be valuable for deriving an accurate surface radiative budget in the Arctic and for cloud parameterization evaluation in weather and climate models. Cloud annual cycles show similar evolutions in total cloud fraction and ice cloud fraction, and lower liquid-containing cloud fraction at Eureka than at Barrow; the differences can be attributed to the generally colder and drier conditions at Eureka relative to Barrow.

scholarly journals The vertical distribution of thin features over the Arctic analysed from CALIPSO observations

Tellus B ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhay Devasthale ◽  
Michael Tjernström ◽  
Ali H. Omar
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Distribution ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Vertical Distribution

scholarly journals Influence of the Arctic Oscillation on the Vertical Distribution of Wintertime Ozone in the Stratosphere and Upper Troposphere over the Northern Hemisphere

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 2905-2919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiankai Zhang ◽  
Fei Xie ◽  
Wenshou Tian ◽  
Yuanyuan Han ◽  
Kequan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Distribution ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Upper Troposphere ◽  
Eddy Transport ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
The Vertical Distribution ◽  
Middle Stratosphere

The influence of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) on the vertical distribution of stratospheric ozone in the Northern Hemisphere in winter is analyzed using observations and an offline chemical transport model. Positive ozone anomalies are found at low latitudes (0°–30°N) and there are three negative anomaly centers in the northern mid- and high latitudes during positive AO phases. The negative anomalies are located in the Arctic middle stratosphere (~30 hPa; 70°–90°N), Arctic upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS; 150–300 hPa, 70°–90°N), and midlatitude UTLS (70–300 hPa, 30°–60°N). Further analysis shows that anomalous dynamical transport related to AO variability primarily controls these ozone changes. During positive AO events, positive ozone anomalies between 0° and 30°N at 50–150 hPa are related to the weakened meridional transport of the Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC) and enhanced eddy transport. The negative ozone anomalies in the Arctic middle stratosphere are also caused by the weakened BDC, while the negative ozone anomalies in the Arctic UTLS are caused by the increased tropopause height, weakened BDC vertical transport, weaker exchange between the midlatitudes and the Arctic, and enhanced ozone depletion via heterogeneous chemistry. The negative ozone anomalies in the midlatitude UTLS are mainly due to enhanced eddy transport from the midlatitudes to the latitudes equatorward of 30°N, while the transport of ozone-poor air from the Arctic to the midlatitudes makes a minor contribution. Interpreting AO-related variability of stratospheric ozone, especially in the UTLS, would be helpful for the prediction of tropospheric ozone variability caused by the AO.

scholarly journals Fine-scale zooplankton vertical distribution in relation to hydrographic and optical characteristics of the surface waters on the Arctic shelf

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Trudnowska ◽  
Slawomir Sagan ◽  
Slawomir Kwasniewski ◽  
Miroslaw Darecki ◽  
Katarzyna Blachowiak-Samolyk
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Distribution ◽  
Surface Waters ◽  
Optical Characteristics ◽  
Arctic Shelf ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Fine Scale
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document