scholarly journals Violence in health care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic; the case of Algerian hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasreddine AISSAOUI

The violence in health care settings is, at the moment, a subject of research which often concerns all the countries of the world, since this phenomenon is increasing in times of turbulence that can shake up the organization of the health system, as well as periods of crisis which can hamper the normal course of healthcare facilities. At the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, violence in healthcare settings in Algeria took a rather worrying turn. So we have confined ourselves to looking for the parties responsible for this violence, without venturing to follow the classic path which sheds light exclusively on the emerging part of the iceberg; in this case the care seeker. Among the solutions proposed to alleviate the scourge of violence during this critical period: enhance interactivity within hospitals in order to dismantle relationship barriers; preventive and repressive measures can be combined in order to regulate the behaviour of the care seeker; establish financial equity, which better serves the good citizen and which gives more responsibility to those who work in the informal sector.

Author(s):  
Anne Weissenstein

We present an update on infection prevention and control for COVID-19 in healthcare settings. This update focuses on measures to be applied in settings with increasing community transmission, growing demand for concern about COVID-19 patients, and subsequent staffing issues in the event of shortages of personal protective equipment for healthcare facilities worldwide. The comfort and emotional resilience of health care workers are key components in maintaining essential health care services during the COVID-19 virus (coronavirus) outbreak.


AAOHN Journal ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 454-455
Author(s):  
Catherine Yuan ◽  
Jin Yu

Nurses from occupational health care settings around the world, interpreting the theme “Communication, Health Care, and the Community,” presented papers at the First International Conference on Occupational Health Nursing in Edinburgh, Scotland in October, 1986. In keeping with AAOHN's commitment to an international perspective, this article is Part II of a five part series of articles that will be printed in the AAOHN JOURNAL. Next month, Part III of the series will feature, “Occupational Health Nursing World Wide.”


10.2196/14684 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. e14684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chukwuma Ukoha ◽  
Andrew Stranieri

Background With the growing use of social media in health care settings, there is a need to measure outcomes resulting from its use to ensure continuous performance improvement. Despite the need for measurement, a unified approach for measuring the value of social media used in health care remains elusive. Objective This study aimed to elucidate how the value of social media in health care settings can be ascertained and to taxonomically identify steps and techniques in social media measurement from a review of relevant literature. Methods A total of 65 relevant articles drawn from 341 articles on the subject of measuring social media in health care settings were qualitatively analyzed and synthesized. The articles were selected from the literature from diverse disciplines including business, information systems, medical informatics, and medicine. Results The review of the literature showed different levels and focus of analysis when measuring the value of social media in health care settings. It equally showed that there are various metrics for measurement, levels of measurement, approaches to measurement, and scales of measurement. Each may be relevant, depending on the use case of social media in health care. Conclusions A comprehensive yardstick is required to simplify the measurement of outcomes resulting from the use of social media in health care. At the moment, there is neither a consensus on what indicators to measure nor on how to measure them. We hope that this review is used as a starting point to create a comprehensive measurement criterion for social media used in health care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
JW Cherrie ◽  
MPC Cherrie ◽  
A Davis ◽  
D Holmes ◽  
S Semple ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the evidence for air and surface contamination of workplace environments with SARS-CoV-2 RNA and the quality of the methods used to identify actions necessary to improve the quality of the data.MethodsWe searched Web of Science and Google Scholar until 24th December 2020 for relevant articles and extracted data on methodology and results.ResultsThe vast majority of data come from healthcare settings, with typically around 6 % of samples having detectable concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and almost none of the samples collected had viable virus. There were a wide variety of methods used to measure airborne virus, although surface sampling was generally undertaken using nylon flocked swabs. Overall, the quality of the measurements was poor. Only a small number of studies reported the airborne concentration of SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA, mostly just reporting the detectable concentration values without reference to the detection limit. Imputing the geometric mean air concentration assuming the limit of detection was the lowest reported value, suggests typical concentrations in health care settings may be around 0.01 SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA copies/m3. Data on surface virus loading per unit area were mostly unavailable.ConclusionThe reliability of the reported data is uncertain. The methods used for measuring SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses in work environments should be standardised to facilitate more consistent interpretation of contamination and to help reliably estimate worker exposure.Key messagesWhat is already known about this subject?Low level contamination of air and surfaces in hospitals with SARS-CoV-2 RNA have been reported during the Covid-19 pandemic.Limited data have published from non-healthcare settings.What are the new findings?Typically, around 6% of air and surface samples in hospitals were positive for SARS-COV-2 RNA, although there is very limited data for non-healthcare settings.The quality of the available measurement studies is generally poor, with little consistency in the sampling and analytical methods used.Few studies report the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 in air or as surface loading of virus RNA, and very few studies have reported culture of the virus.The best estimate of typical air concentrations in health care settings is around 0.01 SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA copies/m3How might this impact on policy or clinical practice in the foreseeable future?There should be concerted efforts to standardise the methods used for measuring SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses in work environments.


Author(s):  
Uroosa Farooq Allaqband ◽  
Anjum B Fazili ◽  
Rohul Jabeen Shah ◽  
Walied K. Balwan

Background: Injection is an important drug delivery system especially for severely ill patients, acute emergency conditions and immunizations. But injections can spread disease to patients, healthcare workers, waste handlers and even in common healthy people if not used and disposed in proper way. Every year at least 16 billion injections are administered worldwide and at least half of them are unsafe. Breaks in safe injection practices coupled with overuse of injections may expose the recipients, healthcare workers or the community to several harms including life-threatening infections. Some factors that lead to unsafe injection practices include use of unsterile injection equipment, unsafe collection of sharps and management of injection related waste, reuse of contaminated needles and syringes and improper sterilization (especially of glass syringes). Material and Methods: A cross sectional observational questionnaire based study was carried out in 40 healthcare facilities of two districts of Kashmir valley (one rural and one urban) selected purposively. The study was conducted amongst 152 injection providers in which 528 injections were observed. The study period was of 1 year from April 16-March 17. A prefabricated validity tested questionnaire was used to gather the requisite information. The questionnaire was divided into two parts. First part consists of questions on three types of observations and the second part consists of questions on four types of interviews. Results: Out of total 528 injections observed 77.3% were curative (I/V, I/M) rest 22.7% were prophylactic (I/M, S/C, I/D). Majority of the providers resorted to practices which were unsafe and harmful to their being. These included practices like breaking glass ampoules without a protective barrier, nonuse of gloves in 97.3%, re-capping of needles in 68.2%, nonuse of needle destroyer in 85.8% and delay in disposal of used needle and syringes in a sharps container in 97.7% of health providers. Majority of the injection providers adopted practices which were unsafe for the patient/client. These included practices like preparation of injection on unclean surface, table or tray in 95.6%, not washing hands before preparing injection 99.8%, not cleaning hands with alcohol based hand rub in 98.5%, not cleaning the rubber cap of multidose vial in 99.3% and palpating venipuncture site after skin preparation with antiseptic in 80.2%. Conclusion: As per the practice of providers, less than 1% of the providers washed their hands with soap and water before and 3.9% after the injection. In all the injections syringe and needle used were taken out from a sterile unopened packet. 95.6% of the injections were not prepared on a clean dedicated table or tray. None of the providers used a clean barrier to protect fingers when breaking the top of glass ampoules.  Only 0.7% of providers cleaned the rubber cap of the multi-dose vial with antiseptic and 70.2% of providers removed the needle from rubber cap.  In case of I/V injections, 90.1% of providers secured the patient and the intended puncture site before the procedure and none of them used a new pair of gloves before administering any type of injections. Keywords: Injections, Health care settings, Healthcare workers.


10.12737/8114 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Орлова ◽  
A. Orlova

High quality of medical care is the primary goal of a health system. At the moment it cann’t be considered high. The results of sociological surveys presented that quite a large proportion of patients isn’t satisfied with the care provided by medical assistance. The causes of this are: absence of funding for health care (and related problems of material and technical base, staffing, staff interest and other), as well as the absence of commonly agreed (and unified with the world) approaches to the definition criteria (indicators), means of verification and a unified system of quality assurance. The moral and ideological factors (destructive changes in the medical profession, the divergence of moral and professional principles, a dominance of the economic aspects of rela-tions, reduced social activity and responsibility) are important. In addition, managers of medical institutions are the following problems of theoretical and methodological nature: the need for a clear distinction between the concepts of "quality of care", "quality of medical services", "quality organization" (including accessibility, ethi-cal aspects, sanitary conditions, which significantly affect the level of subjective assessment). In the context of globalization and international cooperation, it is very important to bring domestic approaches to understanding, assessing, managing the quality of health care in the world.


AAOHN Journal ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Gitonga

Nurses from occupational health care settings around the world, interpreting the theme “Communication, Health Care, and the Community,” presented papers at the First International Conference on Occupational Health Nursing in Edinburgh, Scotland in October, 1986. In keeping with AAOHN's commitment to an international perspective, this is the fifth in a five part series of articles printed in the AAOHN Journal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Grant ◽  
Mamunur Rahman Malik ◽  
Amgad Elkholy ◽  
Maria D Van Kerkhove

Abstract The epidemiology of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) since 2012 has been largely characterized by recurrent zoonotic spillover from dromedary camels followed by limited human-to-human transmission, predominantly in health-care settings. The full extent of infection of MERS-CoV is not clear, nor is the extent and/or role of asymptomatic infections in transmission. We conducted a review of molecular and serological investigations through PubMed and EMBASE from September 2012 to November 15, 2018, to measure subclinical or asymptomatic MERS-CoV infection within and outside of health-care settings. We performed retrospective analysis of laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV infections reported to the World Health Organization to November 27, 2018, to summarize what is known about asymptomatic infections identified through national surveillance systems. We identified 23 studies reporting evidence of MERS-CoV infection outside of health-care settings, mainly of camel workers, with seroprevalence ranges of 0%–67% depending on the study location. We identified 20 studies in health-care settings of health-care worker (HCW) and family contacts, of which 11 documented molecular evidence of MERS-CoV infection among asymptomatic contacts. Since 2012, 298 laboratory-confirmed cases were reported as asymptomatic to the World Health Organization, 164 of whom were HCWs. The potential to transmit MERS-CoV to others has been demonstrated in viral-shedding studies of asymptomatic MERS infections. Our results highlight the possibility for onward transmission of MERS-CoV from asymptomatic individuals. Screening of HCW contacts of patients with confirmed MERS-CoV is currently recommended, but systematic screening of non-HCW contacts outside of health-care facilities should be encouraged.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Somersalo ◽  
Päivi Kankkunen ◽  
Eero Lilja ◽  
Päivikki Koponen ◽  
Hannamaria Kuusio

Abstract Background: Unjust experiences are relatively common among people with foreign background (PFB) in Finland. Despite universal access to public health care, previous studies have shown inequities in the unmet need for medical care between immigrants and the general population. This study examines the association between unjust treatment in healthcare settings and unmet need for general practitioner (GP) services among PFB. Method: The data for this study were drawn from Survey on work and well-being among people of foreign origin (UTH) (n = 4977, response rate 66%). The respondent characteristics were weighted and summarized, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of association between perceived unjust treatment and unmet need for GP services. The analyses were conducted in a four-step process where the first model tested the association between unjust treatment in health care settings and unmet need for GP services, second model adjusted this association by sociodemographic factors, third model was further adjusted by migration related factors, and the fourth model adjusted the previous models even further by health related factors.Results: The results of multivariate regression showed that PFB reporting unjust treatment were also significantly more likely to report an unmet need for GP services. The difference remained significant even after controlling for other tested factors (OR=8.68, 95% CI 6.09-12.36, p<.001). In addition to perceived unjust treatment, only younger age, lower self-rated health and existing long-term illness were significantly associated with unmet need for medical care in the final, fully adjusted model.Conclusions: Thus, perceived unjust treatment in health care settings is significantly associated with unmet need for general practitioner services. Ensuring cultural competence throughout the entire organizational structures creates an environment to promote equal treatment for all clients. The overall costs can be reduced effectively by giving the best possible treatment for all health care users.


AAOHN Journal ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Conn ◽  
Linda Barclay

Nurses from occupational health care settings around the world, interpreting the theme “Communication, Health Care, and the Community,” presented papers at the First International Conference on Occupational Health Nursing in Edinburgh, Scotland in October, 1986. In keeping with AAOHN's commitment to an international perspective, this article is Part I of a five part series of articles that will be printed in the AAOHN JOURNAL. Next month, Part II of the series will feature, “Traditional and Modern Medicine in Worker Health Care.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document