scholarly journals The male mammary gland: a novel target of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Reproduction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian K. Szabo ◽  
Laura N. Vandenberg

In the past several decades, the incidence of two male breast diseases, gynecomastia and male breast cancer, have increased in human populations. Whereas male breast cancer remains a rare disease, gynecomastia, a condition that arises due to abnormal development and growth of the male breast epithelium, is fairly common. In this review, we present the male mouse mammary gland as a potential model to understand human male breast diseases. Even though the male mouse typically lacks nipples, the male retains a small mammary rudiment with epithelium that is highly sensitive to estrogenic chemicals during the perinatal and peripubertal periods. In just the last few years, our understanding of the biology of the male mouse mammary gland has expanded. Researchers have characterized the complexity and size of the male mammary epithelium across the life course. Studies have documented that the male mouse mammary gland has left-right asymmetric morphologies, as well as asymmetries in the responsiveness of the left and right glands to estrogens. Recent studies have also revealed that the effect of xenoestrogens on the male mammary gland can differ based on the timing of evaluation (prior to puberty, in puberty, and in adulthood) and the administered dose. Based on the available evidence, we argue that there is a strong case that estrogenic chemicals promote the growth of the male mouse epithelium, consistent with human gynecomastia. We also argue that these outcomes should be characterized as adverse effects and should be considered in regulatory decision-making.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-29
Author(s):  
Raji Sundararajan ◽  
◽  
Ignacio Camarillo ◽  
Jeya Shree Thulasidas ◽  
S. Poompavai ◽  
...  

Everybody is born with the mammary gland. Mammary gland development occurs through various stages throughout embryonic, and stays dormant for males. Although it is uncommon, male also gets breast cancer, occasionally. Male breast cancer accounts for approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases, and it is increasing. When compared with other rare diseases, male breast cancer is understudied. Typically, male breast cancer is treated in the same way as female breast cancer. In this article, the various aspects and attributes of male breast cancer and its treatment methods are reviewed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Eggemann ◽  
A Ignatov ◽  
R Stabenow ◽  
G von Minkwitz ◽  
FW Röhl ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
N Besic ◽  
B Cernivc ◽  
J De Greve ◽  
K Lokar ◽  
M Krajc ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Kyung Joo Park ◽  
Chun Hwan Han ◽  
Jeong Geun Yi ◽  
Joo Hyuk Lee

1999 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 760-762
Author(s):  
Hisatada HIROKAWA ◽  
Wataru RIKIHISA ◽  
Osamu YAMAMOTO ◽  
Yoshinori SUENAGA ◽  
Masakazu ASAHI

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Francesco Bertagna ◽  
Mattia Bertoli ◽  
Tigu Stela ◽  
Giorgio Saladini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095835
Author(s):  
Wei-Ping Li ◽  
Hong-Fei Gao ◽  
Fei Ji ◽  
Teng Zhu ◽  
Min-Yi Cheng ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of male breast cancer patients has not been determined. The aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in men with stage I–III breast cancer, and we hypothesized that some male patients may safely skip adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Male breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyse the factors associated with survival. The propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to evaluate the impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The primary endpoint was survival. Results: We enrolled 514 patients for this study, including 257 patients treated with chemotherapy and 257 patients without. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) but not in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups ( p < 0.001 for OS and p = 0.128 for BCSS, respectively). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group had a higher 4-year OS rate (97.5% versus 95.2%, p < 0.001), while 4-year BCSS was similar (98% versus 98.8%, p = 0.128). The chemotherapy group had longer OS than the non-chemotherapy group among HR+, HER2–, tumour size >2 cm, lymph node-positive male breast cancer patients ( p < 0.05). Regardless of tumour size, there were no differences in OS or BCSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts for lymph node-negative patients (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant effects on both OS and BCSS in patients with stage I (OS: p = 0.100, BCSS: p = 0.858) and stage IIA breast cancer (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Conclusion: For stage I and stage IIA patients, adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve OS and BCSS. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy might be skipped for stage I and stage IIA male breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document