scholarly journals PRRT in high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (WHO G3)

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. R67-R77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halfdan Sorbye ◽  
Grace Kong ◽  
Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Receptor Imaging ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Net G3

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment for grade 1 and 2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with an increased uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI). Patients with metastatic high-grade (WHO G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET G3 and NEC) represent a heterogeneous subgroup with poor prognosis and standard platinum-etoposide chemotherapy have limited therapeutic benefit. However, there is promising emerging evidence supporting the effectiveness of PRRT in SRI-positive G3 disease. A review search for studies reporting on PRRT in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms G3 was performed: four studies with more than ten cases were found. PRRT was mainly given as second- or third-line treatment in patients with progressive disease. Most patients had a pancreatic primary, 50% had well-differentiated tumors, and most had a Ki-67 <55%. Three studies showed similar results with promising response rates (31–41%) and disease control rates (69–78%). Progression-free survival (11–16 months) and survival (22–46 months) were best concerning patients with a Ki-67 <55%. Progression-free survival was 19 months in NET G3, 11 months for lowNEC (Ki-67 ≤55%) and 4 months for highNEC (Ki-67 >55%). PRRT should be considered for patients with increased uptake on SRI, both in gastroenteropancreatic NET G3 cases and as well as in NEC cases with a Ki-67 21–55%. PRRT for NEC with a Ki-67 >55% is less defined, but could be considered in highly selected cases after response to initial chemotherapy where all residual disease have high uptake on SRI. Dual tracer using 18F-FDG PET/CT and SRI provides important information for patient selection for PRRT in this heterogeneous complex high-grade disease.

scholarly journals Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Heetfeld ◽  
C N Chougnet ◽  
I H Olsen ◽  
A Rinke ◽  
I Borbath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Data on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) G3 (well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)) are limited. We retrospectively study patients with NET G3 and NEC from eight European centers. Data examined included clinical and pathological characteristics at diagnosis, therapies and outcomes. Two hundred and four patients were analyzed (37 NET G3 and 167 NEC). Median age was 64 (21–89) years. Tumor origin included pancreas (32%) and colon-rectum (27%). The primary tumor was resected in 82 (40%) patients. Metastatic disease was evident at diagnosis in 88% (liver metastases: 67%). Median Ki-67 index was 70% (30% in NET G3 and 80% in NEC;P<0.001). Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 23 (95% CI: 18–28) months and significantly higher in NET G3 (99 vs 17 months in NEC; HR=8.3;P<0.001). Platinum-etoposide first line chemotherapy was administered in 113 (68%) NEC and 12 (32%) NET G3 patients. Disease control rate and progression free survival (PFS) were significantly higher in NEC compared to NET G3 (P<0.05), whereas OS was significantly longer in NET G3 (P=0.003). Second- and third-line therapies (mainly FOLFIRI and FOLFOX) were given in 79 and 39 of NEC patients; median PFS and OS were 3.0 and 7.6 months respectively after second-line and 2.5 and 6.2 months after third-line chemotherapy. In conclusion, NET G3 and NEC are characterized by significant differences in Ki-67 index and outcomes. While platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in NEC, it seems to have limited value in NET G3.

scholarly journals Myeloid and T-Cell Microenvironment Immune Features Identify Two Prognostic Sub-Groups in High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1741
Author(s):  
Giovanni Centonze ◽  
Vincenzo Lagano ◽  
Giovanna Sabella ◽  
Alessandro Mangogna ◽  
Giovanna Garzone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Immune Markers ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Clinical Databases ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Net G3

High-grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine neoplasms (H-NENs) comprehend well-differentiated tumors (NET G3) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (NEC) with proliferative activity indexes as mitotic count (MC) >20 mitoses/10 HPF and Ki-67 >20%. At present, no specific therapy for H-NENs exists and the several evidences of microenvironment involvement in their pathogenesis pave the way for tailored therapies. Forty-five consecutive cases, with available information about T-cell, immune, and non-immune markers, from surgical pathology and clinical databases of 2 Italian institutions were immunostained for Arginase, CD33, CD163 and CD66 myeloid markers. The association between features was assessed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. A unsupervised K-means algorithm was used to identify clusters of patients according to inputs of microenvironment features and the relationship between clusters and clinicopathological features, including cancer-specific survival (CSS), was analyzed. The H-NEN population was composed of 6 (13.3%) NET G3 and 39 (86.7%) NEC. Overall, significant positive associations were found between myeloid (CD33, CD163 and Arginase) and T/immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, PD-1 and HLA-I). Myeloid and T-cell markers CD3 and CD8 identified two clusters of patients from unsupervised K-means analysis. Cases grouped in cluster 1 with more myeloid infiltrates, T cell, HLA and expression of inhibitory receptors and ligands in the stroma (PD-1, PD-L1) had significantly better CSS than patients in cluster 2. Multivariable analysis showed that Ki-67 (>55 vs. <55, HR 8.60, CI 95% 2.61–28.33, p < 0.0001) and cluster (1 vs. 2, HR 0.43, CI 95% 0.20–0.93, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with survival. High grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms can be further classified into two prognostic sub-populations of tumors driven by different tumor microenvironments and immune features able to generate the framework for evaluating new therapeutic strategies.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Capecitabine and Temozolomide (CAPTEM) in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs)

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Thomas ◽  
Brianne A. Voros ◽  
Meghan Meadows-Taylor ◽  
Matthew P. Smeltzer ◽  
Ryan Griffin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Lower Hazard

Capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) have shown promising results in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and role for CAPTEM in malignant neuroendocrine neoplasms. Data were obtained from NEN patients who received at least one cycle of CAPTEM between November 2010 and June 2018. The average number of cycles was 9.5. For analysis, 116 patients were included, of which 105 patients (91%) underwent prior treatment. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13 and 38 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 21%. Disease control rate (DCR) was 73% in all patients. PFS, median OS, ORR, and DCR for pancreatic NENs (pNEN) vs. non-pNEN was 29 vs. 11 months, 35 vs. 38 months, 38% vs. 9%, and 77% vs. 71%, respectively. Patients with pNEN had a 50% lower hazard of disease progression compared to those with non-pNEN (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 0.498, p = 0.0100). A significant difference in PFS was found between Ki-67 < 3%, Ki-67 3–20%, Ki-67 > 20–54%, and Ki-67 ≥ 55% (29 vs. 12 vs. 7 vs. 5 months; p = 0.0287). Adverse events occurred in 74 patients (64%). Our results indicate that CAPTEM is associated with encouraging PFS, OS, and ORR data in patients with NENs.

scholarly journals Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borut Kobal ◽  
Marco Noventa ◽  
Branko Cvjeticanin ◽  
Matija Barbic ◽  
Leon Meglic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Evaluation

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to analyze the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of patients with high grade and advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with at least 60 months of follow-up treated in a single gynecologic oncology institute. We compared primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking surgery (NACT + IDS) stratifying data based on residual disease with the intent to identify the rationale for therapeutic option decision and the role of laparoscopic evaluation of resectability for that intention. Patients and methods This is observational retrospective study on consecutive patients with diagnosis of high grade and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV EOC referred to our center between January 2008 and May 2012. We selected only patients with a follow-up of at least 60 months. Primary endpoint was to compare PDS versus NACT + IDS in term of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were PFS and OS stratifying data according to residual disease after surgery in patients receiving PDS versus NACT + IDS. Finally, through Cox hazards models, we tested the prognostic value of different variables (patient age at diagnosis, residual disease after debulking, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) stage, number of adjuvant-chemotherapy cycles) for predicting OS. Results A total number of 157 patients were included in data analysis. Comparing PDS arm (108 patients) and NACT + IDS arm (49 patients) we found no significant differences in term of OS (41.3 versus 34.5 months, respectively) and PFS (17.3 versus 18.3 months, respectively). According to residual disease we found no significant differences in term of OS between NACT + IDS patients with residual disease = 0 and PDS patients with residual disease = 0 or residual disease = 1, as well as no significant differences in PFS were found comparing NACT + IDS patients with residual disease = 0 and PDS patients with residual disease = 0; contrarily, median PFS resulted significantly lower in PDS patients receiving optimal debulking (residual disease = 1) in comparison to NACT + IDS patients receiving complete debulking (residual disease = 0). PDS arm was affected by a significant higher rate of severe post-operative complications (grade 3 and 4). Diagnostic laparoscopy before surgery was significantly associated with complete debulking. Conclusions We confirm previous findings concerning the non-superiority of NACT + IDS compared to PDS for the treatment of EOC, even if NACT + IDS treatment was associated with significant lower rate of post-operative complications. On the other hand, selecting patients for NACT + IDS, based on laparoscopic evaluation of resectabilty prolongs the PFS and does not worse the OS compared to the patients not completely debulked with PDS.

Gastroenteropancreatic High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Histology and Molecular Analysis, Two Sides of the Same Coin

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 616-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adele Busico ◽  
Patrick Maisonneuve ◽  
Natalie Prinzi ◽  
Sara Pusceddu ◽  
Giovanni Centonze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Labeling Index ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Two Sides

Background: In gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (H-NENs), Ki-67 threshold of 55% defines three prognosis subclasses: neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) <55%, and NEC ≥55%. We investigated whether the molecular profiling of H-NENs differs among these subcategories and evaluated potential therapeutic targets, including PD-L1. Methods: In GEP-NEN patients, we evaluated: (i) 55% threshold for Ki-67 labeling index for further stratifying NEC and (ii) immunoreactivity and gene mutations by immunohistochemistry and targeted next-generation sequencing (T-NGS). Results: Fifteen NETs G3 and 39 NECs were identified. Ki-67 labeling index was <55% in 9 NECs and ≥55% in 30 NECs. Gene mutations by NGS (TP53, 32.9%; KRAS, 5.5%; BRAF, 4.1%) were detected in 46.6% NENs, significantly enriched in NEC ≥55% (76.7%) compared to NEC <55% (55.6%) or NET (20.0%). PD-L1 staining in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was observed in NEC ≥55% (36.7%; p = 0.03). Median OS was 4.3 years in NET G3, 1.8 years in NEC <55%, and 0.7 years in NEC ≥55% (p <0.0001); it was 2.3 years with NGS wild-type, 0.7 years with ≥1 mutation (p <0.0001), 0.8 years in PD-L1-positive patients, and 1.7 years in PD-L1-negative subjects (p = 0.0004). In multivariate analysis, only the proposed subclassification approach yielded statistically significant differences between groups (NEC <55% vs. NET G3, HR 14.1, 95% CI 2.2–89.8, p = 0.005; NEC ≥55% vs. NET G3, HR 25.8, 95% CI 3.9–169, p = 0.0007). Conclusions: These findings identify NEC ≥55% as a biologically and prognostically distinct subtype and pave the way for more personalized treatment.

Clinical and Biomarker Evaluations of Sunitinib in Patients with Grade 3 Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Pellat ◽  
Chantal Dreyer ◽  
Camille Couffignal ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Catherine Lombard-Bohas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Lower Response ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

Background/Aims: Angiogenesis is extensively developed in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET) where sunitinib was shown to prolong progression-free survival, leading to nationwide approval. However, clinical experience in patients with grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNEN-G3) remains limited. This prospective phase II trial evaluated potential predictive biomarkers of sunitinib activity in patients with advanced GEPNEN-G3. Methods: Sunitinib was given at a dose of 37.5 mg/day as a continuous daily dosing until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Evaluation of activity was based on RECIST1.1. Safety was evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v4. Pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its main active metabolite SU12662 were evaluated. All tumour samples were reviewed histologically for tumour differentiation. PDGFRβ, carbonic anhydrase 9, Ki-67, VEGFR2, and p-AKT were quantified using immunohistochemistry and their expression correlated with response by RECIST1.1. Results: Thirty-one patients were included and 26 had available histological tissue. Six and 20 patients presented well-differentiated tumours (NET-G3) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), respectively. Eighteen patients responded to sunitinib (4 experienced partial responses and 14 tumour stabilization). A high p-AKT expression correlated with lower response to sunitinib (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.99, p = 0.04). Safety and PK exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 in these patients were consistent with that reported in PanNET. Conclusion: Sunitinib showed evidence of activity in patients with GEPNEN-G3 with expected toxicity profile. In the NET-G3 and NEC groups, 4/6 and 11/20 patients were responders, respectively. High p-AKT expression predicted a lower response to sunitinib. Our study allowed the identification of a potential biomarker of resistance/sensitivity to sunitinib in aggressive GEPNEN-G3.

scholarly journals HIGH-GRADE GASTROENTEROPANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS. MODERN CLASSIFICATION, DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
A. A. Kolomeytseva ◽  
V. A. Gorbunova ◽  
N. F. Orel ◽  
G. S. Emelianova ◽  
A. M. Ivanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Health ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Health Organization

Poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) are rare malignancies, most of which are characterized by aggressiveness, a tendency to rapid metastasis and an unfavorable prognosis even when localized. In 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) updated classification of GEP NENs and recognized the category of well-differentiated pancreatic NET G3, associated with Ki‑67 index usually over 20%. The upper level of Ki‑67 is not defined. Usually it is 55%. Highgrade poorly differentiated pancreatic NENs are defined as pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (panNECs). Although the NET G3 category is recognized for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms only, many specialists consider it reasonable to apply this term to all well-differentiated GEP NETs with Ki‑67 index in the 20 to 55 percent range. Clinical behavior and therapeutic approaches for advanced GEP NECs and NETs G3 are different. Standard palliative chemotherapy for GEP NECs consists of cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide. The second-line regimens include irinotecan-, oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine- and temozolomide-based regimens. Temozolomide-based chemotherapy regimens, as well as targeted therapy are more preferable as first line therapy for patients with NETs G3. The platinum-based chemotherapy regimens are considered at the time of disease progression. Further clinical studies with the inclusion of much more patients will determine the optimal treatment strategy for this category of patients.

scholarly journals Current FDA-Approved Therapies for High-Grade Malignant Gliomas

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 324
Author(s):  
Jacob P. Fisher ◽  
David C. Adamson
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Tumor Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
One Year

The standard of care (SOC) for high-grade gliomas (HGG) is maximally safe surgical resection, followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for 6 weeks, then adjuvant TMZ for 6 months. Before this SOC was established, glioblastoma (GBM) patients typically lived for less than one year after diagnosis, and no adjuvant chemotherapy had demonstrated significant survival benefits compared with radiation alone. In 2005, the Stupp et al. randomized controlled trial (RCT) on newly diagnosed GBM patients concluded that RT plus TMZ compared to RT alone significantly improved overall survival (OS) (14.6 vs. 12.1 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (PFS6) (53.9% vs. 36.4%). Outside of TMZ, there are four drugs and one device FDA-approved for the treatment of HGGs: lomustine, intravenous carmustine, carmustine wafer implants, bevacizumab (BVZ), and tumor treatment fields (TTFields). These treatments are now mainly used to treat recurrent HGGs and symptoms. TTFields is the only treatment that has been shown to improve OS (20.5 vs. 15.6 months) and PFS6 (56% vs. 37%) in comparison to the current SOC. TTFields is the newest addition to this list of FDA-approved treatments, but has not been universally accepted yet as part of SOC.

Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Low-Dose Daily Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremic ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
Biljana Milicic ◽  
Nebojsa Nikolic ◽  
Aleksandar Dagovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to hyperfractionation (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT) offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT given alone in locally advanced (stages III and IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty patients were randomized to receive either Hfx RT alone to a tumor dose of 77 Gy in 70 fractions in 35 treatment days over 7 weeks (group I, n = 65) or the same Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose (6 mg/m2) daily CDDP (group II, n = 65). RESULTS: Hfx RT/chemotherapy offered significantly higher survival rates than Hfx RT alone (68% v 49% at 2 years and 46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0075). It also offered higher progression-free survival (46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0068), higher locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (50% v 36% at 5 years; P = .041), and higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (86% v 57% at 5 years; P = .0013). However, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of either acute or late high-grade RT-induced toxicity. Hematologic high-grade toxicity was more frequent in group II patients. CONCLUSION: As compared with Hfx RT alone, Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CDDP offered a survival advantage, as well as improved LRPFS and DMFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document