scholarly journals Structure and function of RET in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. T79-T90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iván Plaza-Menacho

It has been twenty-five years since the discovery of oncogenic germline RET mutations as the cause of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2). Intensive work over the last two and a half decades on RET genetics, signaling and cell biology has provided the current bases for the genotype–phenotype and functional correlations within this cancer syndrome. On the contrary, the structural and molecular basis for RET tyrosine kinase domain activation and oncogenic deregulation has remained largely elusive. Recent studies with a strong crystallographic and biochemical focus have started to elucidate key insights into such molecular and atomic details revealing unexpected and private mechanisms of actions and molecular determinants not previously envisioned. This review focuses on the structure and function of the RET receptor, and in particular, on what a more detailed view of the protein itself and what the current structural and molecular information tell us about the genotype and phenotype relationships in the cancer syndrome MEN2.

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent E Kruckeberg ◽  
Stephen N Thibodeau

Abstract Background: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) is a cancer syndrome with well-characterized causative mutations. Missense mutations in ∼15 codons of the RET gene have been linked to disease phenotypes in the vast majority of cases. These missense mutations range from very simple single nucleotide base changes to more numerous changes at a given codon; they therefore are often tested for by more than one DNA-based diagnostic method. We developed and evaluated a Pyrosequencing™ technology-based approach for MEN2 mutation testing that allows both simple and complex mutations to be analyzed on one platform. Methods: Archived DNA from peripheral blood of patients referred to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Genetics laboratory for MEN2 testing was selected. One to all of codons 609, 611, 618, 620, 630, 634, 768, 804, and 918 were analyzed by Pyrosequencing technology to match the original analysis of each patient. Template PCRs were set up using an automated liquid handler; the subsequent post-PCR preparation step was performed manually, and the sequencing was performed by a PSQ 96 instrument. Samples were tested in batch sizes expected to occur routinely. Results: We analyzed samples from 217 patients who previously tested negative for MEN2 and 230 patients who previously tested positive, for a total of 1449 sequencing reactions. One discrepant result was found (100% concordant for negatives and 99.6% concordant for positives). A total of 37 unique mutations or alterations of unknown significance were analyzed. Conclusion: Pyrosequencing technology offers an accurate, nonisotopic, simple, and rapid method for the analysis of DNA from patients suspected of having MEN2.


2010 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Romei ◽  
Stefano Mariotti ◽  
Laura Fugazzola ◽  
Augusto Taccaliti ◽  
Furio Pacini ◽  
...  

The journal and the authors apologise for an error in the name of one of the authors (appears as Verga Uberta) of this article published in the European Journal of Endocrinology Vol 163 301–308. The correct name of the author should be Uberta Verga and not as published.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document