scholarly journals Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. R163-R185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Frilling ◽  
Goran Åkerström ◽  
Massimo Falconi ◽  
Marianne Pavel ◽  
Jose Ramos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography Imaging ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Mesenteric Lymph Nodes ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Endoscopic Ablation

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represent a heterogenous group of tumors arising from a variety of neuroendocrine cell types. The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs have markedly increased over the last three decades. Symptoms are often absent in early disease, or vague and nonspecific even in advanced disease. Delayed diagnosis is thus common. Chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker but has limitations as does the proliferative marker Ki-67%, which is often used for tumor grading and determination of therapy. The development of a multidimensional prognostic nomogram may be valuable in predicting tumor behavior and guiding therapy but requires validation. Identification of NENs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) allows for SSTR scintigraphy and positron emission tomography imaging using novel radiolabeled compounds. Complete surgical resection of limited disease or endoscopic ablation of small lesions localized in stomach or rectum can provide cure; however, the majority of GEP-NENs are metastatic (most frequently the liver and/or mesenteric lymph nodes) at diagnosis. Selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from advanced surgical techniques including hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Somatostatin analogs are effective for symptomatic treatment and exhibit some degree of antiproliferative activity in small intestinal NENs. There is a place for streptozotocin, temozolomide, and capecitabine in the management of pancreatic NENs, while new agents targeting either mTOR (everolimus) or angiogenic (sunitinib) pathways have shown efficacy in these lesions.

scholarly journals Medical Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1860
Author(s):  
Lola-Jade Palmieri ◽  
Solène Dermine ◽  
Amélie Barré ◽  
Marion Dhooge ◽  
Catherine Brezault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Proliferation Index ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Histologic Differentiation ◽  
Surgical Treatments

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are relatively rare but their incidence has increased almost sevenfold over the last four decades. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified according to their histologic differentiation and their grade. Their grade is based on their Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic index. Their prognosis is highly variable according to these elements and treatments also vary according to their classification. Surgery is the only curative treatment for localized and advanced panNENs and offers a better prognosis than non-surgical treatments. In the case of an advanced panNEN without the possibility of resection and/or ablation, medical treatment remains the cornerstone for improving survival and preserving quality-of-life. PanNENs are considered as chemosensitive tumors, unlike midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Thus, panNENs can be treated with chemotherapy, but targeted therapies and somatostatin analogs are also treatment options. The scarcity and heterogeneity of NENs make their management difficult. The present review aims to clarify the medical treatments currently available for advanced panNENs, based on their characteristics, and to propose a treatment algorithm.

scholarly journals Advances and Current Concepts in the Medical Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystallenia I. Alexandraki ◽  
Aggeliki Karapanagioti ◽  
Ioannis Karoumpalis ◽  
Georgios Boutzios ◽  
Gregory A. Kaltsas
Keyword(s):  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Molecular Signature ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Develop Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare and heterogeneous group of tumors presenting as localised or metastatic disease and in a subset with distinct clinical syndromes. Treatment is aimed at controlling the functional syndrome, eradicating the tumor, and/or preventing further tumor growth. Surgery is the treatment of choice in removing the primary tumor and/or reducing tumor burden but cannot be applied to all patients. Somatostatin analogs (SS-analogs) obtain control of functional syndromes in the majority of GEP-neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); phase III trials have shown that SS-analogs can be used as first-line antiproliferative treatment in patients with slow-growing GEP-NETs. The role of the recently approved serotonin inhibitor, telotristat ethyl, and gastrin receptor antagonist, netazepide, is evolving. Streptozotocin-based chemotherapy has been used for inoperable or progressing pancreatic NENs but the orally administered combination of capecitabine/temozolomide is becoming more popular due to its better tolerability and potential effect in other GEP-NENs. Phase III trials have shown efficacy of molecular targeted therapies in GEP-NETs and of radionuclide treatment in patients with midgut carcinoid tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Most patients will develop disease progression necessitating further therapeutic options. A combination of currently available treatments along with the molecular signature of each tumor will guide future treatment.

scholarly journals Molecular Imaging using PET/CT Applying 68Ga-Labeled Tracers and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Theranostics on the Way to Personalized Medicine

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P Baum ◽  
Harshad R Kulkarni
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Imaging ◽  
Personalized Medicine ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Targeted Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Beta Emitters ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
The Way

ABSTRACT Theranostics is an acronym, which exemplifies the togetherness of diagnostics and therapeutics in the individualized management of disease. The key to personalized medicine in cancer is to determine the molecular phenotypes of neoplasms, so that specific probes can be selected to target the tumor and its microenvironment. Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy using a particular probe is based on this premise. Neuroendocrine neoplasms express somatostatin receptors, enabling the use of somatostatin analogs for molecular imaging, when labeled with the positron-emitter 68Ga for receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and targeted radionuclide therapy, when labeled with beta-emitters 90Y and 177Lu. How to cite this article Kulkarni HR, Baum RP. Molecular Imaging using PET/CT Applying 68Ga-Labeled Tracers and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Theranostics on the Way to Personalized Medicine. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2013; 47(1):47-53.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 572-572
Author(s):  
Mengjie Jiang ◽  
Hanguang Hu ◽  
Ying Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Clinicopathological Feature ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Pathological Classification

572 Background: Limited research is available regarding colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), especially in China. The prognostic factors of colorectal NENs remain controversial. Methods: A total of 68 patients with colorectal NENs were studied retrospectively. Clinical characteristics and prognosis between colonic and rectal NENs were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the capacity of various factors to predict the outcome. Results: Of the 68 colorectal NENs patients, 43 (63.2%) had rectal NENs, and 25 (36.8%) had colonic NENs. Compared with rectal NENs, colonic NENs more frequently exhibited larger tumor size ( P < 0.0001) and distant metastasis ( P < 0.0001). Colonic NENs had a worse prognosis ( P= 0.027), with 5-year overall survival rates of 66.7% vs. 88.1% compared with rectal NENs. Neuroendocrine tumors, neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed adenoendocrine carcinomaswere noted in 61.8%, 23.5% and 14.7% of patients, respectively. According to the available data (n = 49), Ki-67 index values were ≤ 2% in 27 (39.7%) patients, ranged from 3 to 20% in 6 patients (8.8%) and were > 20% in 16 patients (23.5%). Multivariate analyses revealed that tumor location was not an independent prognostic factor ( P= 0.081), but tumor size ( P= 0.037) and pathological classification ( P= 0.012) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Significant differences in clinicopathological feature and outcome exist between colonic and rectal NENs. Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor size and pathological classification were associated with the prognosis. However, tumor location was not an independent factor. The worse outcome of colonic NENs observed in clinical practice might be due not only to the biological differences, but also to larger tumor size in colonic NENs caused by the delayed diagnosis.

scholarly journals Mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gallbladder: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuki Ishikawa ◽  
Katsunori Nakano ◽  
Masafumi Osaka ◽  
Kenichi Aratani ◽  
Kadotani Yayoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
System Analysis ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasonography ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
History Of ◽  
Lymph Nodes Dissection

Abstract Background  Primary neuroendocrine tumors of the gallbladder (GB-NETs) are rare, accounting for 0.5% of all NETs and 2.1% of all gallbladder cancers. Among GB-NETs, mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gallbladder (GB-MiNENs) are extremely rare. Case presentation We present the case of a 66-year-old woman who was referred to us for the management of a gallbladder tumor (incidentally found during abdominal ultrasonography indicated for gallbladder stones). The patient had no history of abdominal pain or fever, and the findings on a physical examination were unremarkable. Blood tests showed normal levels of tumor markers. Imaging studies revealed a mass of approximately 10 mm in diameter (with no invasion of the gallbladder bed) located at the fundus of the gallbladder. A gallbladder cancer was suspected. Therefore, an open whole-layer cholecystectomy with regional lymph nodes dissection was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged on postoperative day 6. Pathological findings showed GB-MiNENs with invasion of the subserosal layer and no lymph node invasion (classified T2aN0M0 pStage IIA according to the Union for International Cancer Control, 8th edition staging system). Analysis of the neuroendocrine markers revealed positive chromogranin A and synaptophysin, and a Ki-67 index above 95%. Fourteen months after the operation, a local recurrence was detected, and she was referred to another hospital for chemotherapy. Conclusions  GB-MiNENs are extremely aggressive tumors despite their tumor size. Optimal therapy should be chosen for each patient.

Increase of Ki‐67 index and influence on mortality in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pernille Holmager ◽  
Seppo W. Langer ◽  
Birgitte Federspiel ◽  
Gro Linno Willemoe ◽  
Rajendra Singh Garbyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67

Multifocal Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms In Tuberous Sclerosis: A Rare Case

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S77-S77
Author(s):  
N C Jadhav ◽  
D L Gang
Keyword(s):  
Tuberous Sclerosis ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Von Hippel Lindau ◽  
Multifocal Disease

Abstract Casestudy: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN) are rare accounting for 2-5% of pancreatic tumors. Although mostly sporadic, 10-20% are associated with inherited syndromes, notably MEN-1, Von Hippel- Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1, and tuberous sclerosis (TS). When compared to sporadic cases, PanNEN in hereditary syndromes occur at a younger age, are often multifocal, cystic, and may show characteristic microscopic patterns. TS is an autosomal dominant multi-system disorder with mutations involving TSC1 or TSC2 genes which function as tumor suppressors by inhibiting mTORC1 kinase. PanNEN is observed in 1.5-1.8% of patients with TS and no surveillance guidelines for the assessment of pancreatic lesions are established. Compared to other syndromes, PanNEN associated with TS are solitary. To our knowledge, only two cases of multifocal PanNEN in TS patients have been reported. We present a case of a 67-year-old gentleman with a history of TS also affecting two daughters. He presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound suggested acute appendicitis and an incidental 2.0 cm solid lesion was noted in the head of the pancreas. Follow-up MRI revealed two additional non-cystic masses in the pancreatic tail. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of a tail lesion revealed monomorphic tumor cells with stippled chromatin without cytologic atypia. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin. Ki-67 labelling index was under 1%. Diagnosis of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (G1) was made. The patient denied symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome and no biologically active hormones were detected. Gallium PET scan revealed multiple foci of radiotracer uptake throughout the pancreas in addition to those described on MRI. Although PanNEN are rare in TS, malignant behavior has been reported. This case reinforces the importance of early detection through active surveillance, especially as surgical options may be limited in multifocal disease.

scholarly journals Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: A Clinical Dilemma in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Leonidas Apostolidis ◽  
Jörg Schrader ◽  
Henning Jann ◽  
Anja Rinke ◽  
Sebastian Krug
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Sensory Deficits ◽  
Clinical Dilemma

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by paraneoplastic syndromes, brain metastases, or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) has only been described in individual case reports. We evaluated patients with LC in four neuroendocrine tumor (NET) centers (Halle/Saale, Hamburg, Heidelberg, and Marburg) and characterized them clinically. In the study, 17 patients with a LC were defined with respect to diagnosis, clinic, and therapy. The prognosis of a LC is very poor, with 10 months in median overall survival (mOS). This is reflected by an even worse course in neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) G3 Ki-67 >55%, with a mOS of 2 months. Motor and sensory deficits together with vigilance abnormalities were common symptoms. In most cases, targeted radiation or temozolomide therapy was used against the LC. LC appears to be similarly devastating to brain metastases in NEN patients. Therefore, the indication for CNS imaging should be discussed in certain cases.

scholarly journals Selection of the First 99mTc-Labelled Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Antagonist for Clinical Translation—Preclinical Assessment of Two Optimized Candidates

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Melpomeni Fani ◽  
Viktoria Weingaertner ◽  
Petra Kolenc Peitl ◽  
Rosalba Mansi ◽  
Raghuvir H. Gaonkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Binding ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Preclinical Study ◽  
Clinical Translation ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Receptor Subtype ◽  
Selection Of

Recently, radiolabelled antagonists targeting somatostatin receptors subtype 2 (SST2) in neuroendocrine neoplasms demonstrated certain superior properties over agonists. Within the ERA-PerMED project “TECANT” two 99mTc-Tetramine (N4)-derivatized SST2 antagonists (TECANT-1 and TECANT-2) were studied for the selection of the best candidate for clinical translation. Receptor-affinity, internalization and dissociation studies were performed in human embryonic kidney-293 (HEK293) cells transfected with the human SST2 (HEK-SST2). Log D, protein binding and stability in human serum were assessed. Biodistribution and SPECT/CT studies were carried out in nude mice bearing HEK-SST2 xenografts, together with dosimetric estimations from mouse-to-man. [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1 showed higher hydrophilicity and lower protein binding than [99mTc]-TECANT-2, while stability was comparable. Both radiotracers revealed similar binding affinity, while [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1 had higher cellular uptake (>50%, at 2 h/37 °C) and lower dissociation rate (<30%, at 2 h/37 °C). In vivo, [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1 showed lower blood values, kidney and muscles uptake, whereas tumour uptake was comparable to [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-2. SPECT/CT imaging confirmed the biodistribution results, providing the best tumour-to-background image contrast for [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1 at 4 h post-injection (p.i.). The estimated radiation dose amounted to approximately 6 µSv/MBq for both radiotracers. This preclinical study provided the basis of selection of [99mTc]Tc-TECANT-1 for clinical translation of the first 99mTc-based SST2 antagonist.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document