Short-term kinetics of LRH-induced LH-release in the long-term ovariectomized rat

1982 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Koiter ◽  
N. Pols-Valkhof ◽  
G. A. Schuiling

Abstract. In a first series of experiments plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) were measured at 10 min intervals during 2 h of constant rate infusion of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LRH; 104 ng/ h) in phenobarbitone-anaesthetized long-term ovariectomized (OVX) rats, treated with oil or oestradiol-benzoate (OeB). From these data the mean LH secretion rates during the sampling intervals were calculated using a one-compartment model for the elimination of LH from the plasma. It was found in the OeB-primed OVX rats that during the initial 30–40 min of infusion the LH release is high but constant. Thereafter it shows a further increase. In the oil-treated OVX rats a similar biphasic LH release pattern was found, but in these animals it was preceded by an initial phase of very high LH release, lasting a few minutes. In another series of experiments a second LRH infusion (again 104 ng/h) was given to OeB-primed OVX rats, starting 1.5 h after the discontinuation of a first LRH infusion lasting either 1, 3.5 or 20 h. The resulting secondary LH responses were smaller the longer the first infusion had lasted, but the LH secretion pattern was similar with all three time schedules and resembled the triphasic pattern observed during the first experiment in the oil-treated OVX rats, rather than the biphasic pattern of the OeB-primed OVX rats. These results indicate that the LH response to LRH of OVX rats (either treated with OeB or oil), like that of the cyclic rats, exhibits a phase of constant LH release. It is generally assumed that during this period conditions, necessary for the subsequent further increase of the LH secretion, are generated. It is concluded that these conditions largely disappear during a 1.5 h non-stimulus period. It is also concluded that the short initial phase of very high LH secretion is due to recent exposure of the LH-secretory system to stimulatory amounts of LRH.

1982 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Koiter ◽  
N. Pols-Valkhof ◽  
G. A. Schuiling

Abstract. The influence of an LRH injection (50 ng/ 100 g b.w.) on the LH-response to a second, equally large LRH injection or a constant rate infusion of LRH (104 ng/h), administered 1 h later, was studied in phenobarbitone-anaesthetized, oil- or oestradiol benzoate (OeB)-treated rats ovariectomized (OVX) 5 weeks earlier. From the plasma LH concentration the mean maximal LH secretion rates, as well as the amounts of LH secreted, were calculated on the basis of a one-compartment model, proceeding from a half-life of LH of 15 min. In both the oil- and the OeB-treated animals, not only the mean maximal LH secretion rate, but also the amount of LH secreted during the first hour following the injection, was significantly higher after the second LRH injection than after the first one (LRH self-priming effect). Infusion of LRH in LRH-primed OVX rats revealed that the LH secretion accelerates immediately after the start of the infusion and this acceleration lasts about 1 h. In the saline-injected controls, on the other hand, the LH secretion, although elevated, remains constant during the first 30 min of LRH infusion and accelerates only thereafter during about 1 h. Yet, maximal LH secretion rates are not statistically different between the LRH-primed oil- or OeB-treated OVX rats and their respective saline-injected controls. It is concluded that the self-priming effect of LRH does not lead to an increase of the ultimate maximal LH secretion rate. Rather, during priming the conditions necessary for immediate acceleration of the LH secretion rate are established, and priming thus causes a shift in time, that is, an advancement, of the LH-response to a subsequent LRH stimulus.


1983 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. D'Occhio ◽  
B. D. Schanbacher ◽  
J. E. Kinder

Abstract. The acute castrate ram (wether) was used as an experimental model to investigate the site(s) of feedback on luteinizing hormone (LH) by testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and oestradiol. At the time of castration, wethers were implanted subdermally with Silastic capsules containing either crystalline testosterone (three 30 cm capsules), dihydrotestosterone (five 30 cm capsules) or oestradiol (one 6.5 cm capsule). Blood samples were taken at 10 min intervals for 6 h 2 weeks after implantation to determine serum steroid concentrations and to characterize the patterns of LH secretion. Pituitary LH response to exogenous LRH (5 ng/kg body weight) were also determined at the same time. The steroid implants produced serum concentrations of the respective hormones which were either one-third (testosterone) or two-to-four times (dihydrotestosterone, oestradiol) the levels measured in rams at the time of castration. Non-implanted wethers showed rhythmic pulses of LH (pulse interval 40–60 min) and had elevated LH levels (16.1 ± 1.6 ng/ml; mean ± se) 2 weeks after castration. All three steroids suppressed pulsatile LH release and reduced mean LH levels (to below 3 ng/ml) and pituitary LH responses to LRH. Inhibition of pulsatile LH secretion by all three steroids indicated that testosterone as well as its androgenic and oestrogenic metabolites can inhibit the LRH pulse generator in the hypothalamus. Additional feedback on the pituitary was indicated by the dampened LH responses to exogenous LRH.


1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela T. Pérez ◽  
Marta E. Apfelbaum

The purpose of the present experiments was to examine the short- and long-term effects of estradiol-17β (E2), progesterone (P), and 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), alone and in combination, on the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, using an ovariectomized rat pituitary cells culture model. After 72 h in steroid-free medium, pituitary cells were further cultured for 24 h in medium with or without E2 (1 nM), P (100 nM), or DHT (10 nM). Cultures were then incubated for 5 h in the absence or presence of 1 nM GnRH with or without steroids. LH was measured in the medium and cell extract by radioimmunoassay. The results show that the steroid hormones exert opposite effects on the release of LH induced by GnRH, which seems to be dependent upon the length of time the pituitary cells have been exposed to the steroids. In fact, short-term (5 h) action of E2 resulted in a partial inhibition (64% of control) of LH release in response to GnRH, while long-term (24 h) exposure enhanced (158%) GnRH-induced LH release. Similar results were obtained with DHT, although the magnitude of the effect was lower than with E2. Conversely, P caused an acute stimulatory action (118%) on the LH released in response to GnRH and a slightly inhibitory effect (90%) after chronic treatment. GnRH-stimulated LH biosynthesis was also influenced by steroid treatment. Significant increases in total (cells plus medium) LH were observed in pituitary cells treated with E2 or DHT. While the stimulatory effect of E2 was evident after both acute (133%) and chronic (119%) treatment, that of DHT appears to be exerted mainly after long-term priming (118%). These results suggest that the steroids modulate GnRH-induced LH secretion by acting on both synthesis and release of LH. On the other hand, total hormone content was not affected by P. The acute (5 h) effects of E2, P, and DHT on the GnRH response in E2-primed (24 h) cells during a short-term incubation, were also tested. Addition of P to the pituitary cells primed with E2 led to an acute potentiation of the stimulatory effect of E2 on GnRH-induced LH release and total content. Conversely, the augmentative E2 effect on pituitary responsiveness to GnRH was abolished by DHT. Taken together, these findings suggest that the physiological significance of the stimulatory action of progesterone could be to define the final magnitude of the LH preovulatory surge, while the inhibition by DHT could be required to limit the LH surge to that day of proestrus.Key words: luteinizing hormone, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, steroid hormones, cultured pituitary cells.


2017 ◽  
Vol 233 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinuyo Iwata ◽  
Yuyu Kunimura ◽  
Keisuke Matsumoto ◽  
Hitoshi Ozawa

Hyperandrogenic women have various grades of ovulatory dysfunction, which lead to infertility. The purpose of this study was to determine whether chronic exposure to androgen affects the expression of kisspeptin (ovulation and follicle development regulator) or release of luteinizing hormone (LH) in female rats. Weaned females were subcutaneously implanted with 90-day continuous-release pellets of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and studied after 10 weeks of age. Number of Kiss1-expressing cells in both the anteroventral periventricular nucleus (AVPV) and arcuate nucleus (ARC) was significantly decreased in ovary-intact DHT rats. Further, an estradiol-induced LH surge was not detected in DHT rats, even though significant differences were not observed between DHT and non-DHT rats with regard to number of AVPV Kiss1-expressing cells or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-immunoreactive (ir) cells in the presence of high estradiol. Kiss1-expressing and neurokinin B-ir cells were significantly decreased in the ARC of ovariectomized (OVX) DHT rats compared with OVX non-DHT rats; pulsatile LH secretion was also suppressed in these animals. Central injection of kisspeptin-10 or intravenous injection of a GnRH agonist did not affect the LH release in DHT rats. Notably, ARC Kiss1-expressing cells expressed androgen receptors (ARs) in female rats, whereas only a few Kiss1-expressing cells expressed ARs in the AVPV. Collectively, our results suggest excessive androgen suppresses LH surge and pulsatile LH secretion by inhibiting kisspeptin expression in the ARC and disruption at the pituitary level, whereas AVPV kisspeptin neurons appear to be directly unaffected by androgen. Hence, hyperandrogenemia may adversely affect ARC kisspeptin neurons, resulting in anovulation and menstrual irregularities.


Author(s):  
A.M.X. Eloy ◽  
R.G. Rodway

Normal reproductive function in female animals can be drastically impaired by a variety of stressful stimuli. For example, undernutrition and hypoglycaemia in sheep have been shown to suppress pulsatile LH secretion and to reduce the number of ewes showing pre-ovulatory LH peaks (Crump and Rodway 1986, Clarke et al. 1990). Similar stresses are also known to cause release of the opioid peptide β-endorphin into the circulation. Opioids are well-known to have a central inhibitory effect on LH release, although whether the elevated plasma concentrations of these peptides have any effect on LH secretion is unclear. The present study investigated the affect of insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on plasma concentrations of β-endorphin and LH.


2000 ◽  
Vol 278 (4) ◽  
pp. E744-E751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Kishi ◽  
Mariko Itoh ◽  
Sachiko Wada ◽  
Yoko Yukinari ◽  
Yumiko Tanaka ◽  
...  

We investigated the importance of inhibin and testosterone in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion in adult male golden hamsters ( Mesocricetus auratus). After castration, plasma concentrations of inhibin and testosterone were reduced to undetectable, whereas plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were increased. After hemicastration, plasma FSH and LH increased moderately and plasma inhibin decreased to one-half its initial level. Plasma testosterone levels in hemicastrated animals decreased 3 h after hemicastration but returned to those in sham-operated animals at 6 h. Plasma LH in the castrated hamster declined comparably to intact animals with testosterone treatment; plasma FSH also decreased but still remained at levels higher than those in intact animals. After treatment with inhibin in long-term-castrated animals, plasma FSH decreased, whereas plasma LH was not altered. Intact males treated with flutamide, an anti-androgen, showed a significant increase in plasma LH but not in FSH. On the other hand, treatment with anti-inhibin serum induced a significant elevation in plasma FSH, but not in LH. Using immunohistochemistry, we showed that the inhibin α-subunit was localized to both Sertoli and Leydig cells. The present study in adult male hamsters indicates that FSH secretion is regulated mainly by inhibin, presumably from Sertoli and Leydig cells, and that LH secretion is controlled primarily by androgens produced from the Leydig cells. This situation is more similar to that of primates than of rats.


1997 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Aurich ◽  
J Lange ◽  
H-O Hoppen ◽  
J E Aurich

Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of oestradiol, melatonin and season on the opioid regulation of LH and prolactin release. Effects of the opioid antagonist naloxone (0·5 mg/kg) on LH and prolactin secretion were determined in ovariectomized pony mares. In experiment 1, mares in January (n=6) were pretreated with oestradiol benzoate (5 μg/kg) for 20 days. In experiment 2, beginning in May, mares (n=7) received melatonin (15 mg) for 15 days and subsequently a combination of melatonin plus oestradiol for 20 days. In experiment 3, beginning in May, mares (n=6) were pretreated with oestradiol for 30 days, left untreated for 12 days and then given melatonin for 35 days. In all experiments the animals were injected with the opioid antagonist naloxone and saline on 2 consecutive days prior to treatment. In experiment 1, animals received naloxone and saline on days 10 and 11 and 20 and 21 following oestradiol treatment. In experiment 2, naloxone and saline were administered on days 15 and 16 following melatonin treatment and on days 10 and 11 and 20 and 21 of melatonin plus oestradiol treatment. In experiment 3, the animals received naloxone and saline on days 10 and 11, 20 and 21 and 30 and 31 of oestradiol treatment, prior to melatonin treatment and on days 15 and 16, 25 and 26 and 35 and 36 following melatonin. In January (experiment 1), naloxone evoked a significant (P<0·05) LH release at all times, however the LH increment in response to naloxone increased during oestradiol pretreatment (P<0·05) During the breeding season (experiments 2 and 3), naloxone induced a significant (P<0·05) increase in plasma LH concentrations when mares had not been pretreated with oestradiol or melatonin and after oestradiol pretreatment. Basal LH concentrations and the LH increment in response to naloxone increased significantly (P<0·05) during the 30-day oestradiol pretreatment. Melatonin decreased the naloxone-induced LH release and the LH release in response to naloxone and saline no longer differed after 25 and 35 days of melatonin pretreatment. When melatonin was given together with oestradiol for 20 days, again a significant (P<0·05) LH release in response to naloxone occurred. Prolactin release was significantly (P<0·05) increased by naloxone when mares had been pretreated with only melatonin. The opioid antagonist did not affect prolactin release in mares that had not been pretreated or received oestradiol either alone or in combination with melatonin. In conclusion, in long-term ovariectomized mares, opioids inhibit LH secretion independent from ovarian factors. This opioid inhibition of LH secretion is enhanced by oestradiol and reduced by melatonin. Although short-term melatonin treatment in-activates the opioid regulation of LH release, a prolonged influence of melatonin as occurs in winter does not prevent activation of the opioid system. This indicates that effects of melatonin on the opioid regulation of LH release change with time. An opioid inhibition of prolactin secretion is activated by melatonin given for 15–35 days but is lost under the prolonged influence of a short-day melatonin signal in winter. Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 154, 241–248


1981 ◽  
Vol 240 (6) ◽  
pp. E602-E608
Author(s):  
L. Lagace ◽  
F. Labrie ◽  
T. Antakly ◽  
G. Pelletier

To determine possible effects of the time in culture on the responsiveness of the different pituitary cell types to estrogens, rat anterior pituitary cells were incubated up to 20 days in the presence or absence of 10 nM 17 beta-estradiol. Whereas spontaneous luteinizing hormone (LH) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) release decreased by 85-90%, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and prolactin accumulation in medium were only 50% decreased after 20 days in culture, thus suggesting that the secretion of FSH and prolactin is less dependent on extrinsic stimulatory factors. Estradiol increased spontaneous LH release and its responsiveness to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) up to day 16 in culture, whereas the stimulatory effect of the estrogen on FSH secretion was significant only up to day 6. The stimulatory effect of estradiol on basal TSH release was seen up to day 8 in culture, whereas that on spontaneous prolactin release increased progressively after day 8 in culture up to the last time interval studied (20 days). As revealed by immunocytochemistry, the stimulatory effect of estradiol was not due to changes of cell growth.


1993 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Salicioni ◽  
R. W. Carón ◽  
R. P. Deis

ABSTRACT There is evidence that the adrenals play a role in the regulation of the synthesis and release of gonadotrophins in various vertebrates. The aim of this study was to determine the part played by adrenal steroids, with special reference to progesterone, on the concentration of LH in ovariectomized (OVX) and oestrogen-primed rats. OVX rats received a single s.c. injection of vehicle or oestradiol benzoate (OB, 20 μg/rat). This day was designated as day 0. Three or four days later (day 3–day 4), the rats were treated with mifepristone (10 mg/kg) or with two doses of progesterone antiserum and blood samples were obtained at 13.00 and 18.00 h. OB treatment of OVX rats reduced serum LH at 13.00 h and 18.00 h on day 3 but only at 13.00 h on day 4. The administration of mifepristone at 08.00 h to OVX and oestrogen-treated rats induced a significant increase in serum LH at 18.00 h on days 3 and 4, without modifying the values at 13.00 h. When mifepristone was given at 13.00 h a much larger increase in serum LH was obtained at 18.00 h. In OVX and oestrogen-treated rats, adrenalectomy on day 2 (08.00–09.00 h) induced an increase in serum LH at 18.00 h similar to that observed in the OVX and oestrogen-primed rats after mifepristone treatment. In order to determine the specificity of the effect of mifepristone, a group of OVX and oestrogentreated rats was injected with progesterone antiserum at 08.00 and 13.00 h on day 3. Serum LH concentrations at 13.00 and 18.00 h on day 3 were similar to values obtained in OVX rats treated with oestrogen and mifepristone. Serum progesterone was measured at 08.00 and 13.00 h in OVX and OVX and oestrogenprimed rats. At both times, values were similar in OVX rats but oestrogen treatment significantly increased serum progesterone levels. The important role of adrenal progesterone on the regulation of LH secretion in OVX and oestrogen-primed rats is evident from these results. Blocking progesterone action at the receptor level, we showed that OB significantly increased LH values at 18.00 h. On the basis of these studies it is tempting to speculate on the possibility of an inhibitory or stimulatory effect of oestrogen on serum LH concentration in OVX rats, according to the presence or absence of adrenal progesterone action. Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 139, 253–258


1995 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Evans ◽  
S J Hurd ◽  
D R Mason

Abstract Although GnRH is believed to be the primary secretagogue for LH, oxytocin has also been shown to stimulate LH release from the anterior pituitary. We investigated the possibility that the two secretagogues interact in the modulation of LH release. Anterior pituitaries were removed from adult female rats at pro-oestrus, and tissue pieces were pre-incubated in oxytocin for 3 h prior to being stimulated with 15 min pulses of GnRH. LH output over the 1 h period from the beginning of the GnRH pulse was determined. Control incubations were carried out in the absence of oxytocin, and background secretory activities without GnRH stimulation were also determined. Tissue which was pre-exposed to oxytocin (0·012–1·25 μm) had an increased LH response to GnRH (1·25 nm). The increase was larger than the sum of the LH outputs obtained with oxytocin and GnRH separately, revealing that oxytocin synergistically enhanced LH secretion elicited by GnRH (P<0·05; ANOVA). If stimulation by GnRH was delayed for 2 h after incubation with oxytocin, an increase in LH secretion was still observed, indicating that oxytocin-induced modulation did not rapidly disappear. Oxytocin pre-incubation was observed to result in an increase of maximal GnRH-induced LH output (P<0·001; t-test), as well as an increase of intermediate responses. The LH response of the anterior pituitary to subsequent pulses of GnRH was modified by the self-priming process. The effect of oxytocin pretreatment on the response of primed tissue to GnRH was also investigated. It was found that pre-incubation in oxytocin also enhanced the LH response of primed tissue to GnRH. The study has revealed that oxytocin increases the LH output of anterior pituitary tissue in response to GnRH. The effect occurs on both GnRH-primed and unprimed tissues. The results suggest that oxytocin has the potential to regulate the dynamics of the pro-oestrous LH surge. Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 145, 113–119


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document