QUANTIFYING THE EFFECTS OF HIGHER ORDER JAHN-TELLER COUPLING TERMS ON A QUADRATIC JAHN-TELLER HAMILTONIAN IN THE CASE OF NO3 AND Li3.

Author(s):  
Henry Tran ◽  
Terry Miller ◽  
John Stanton
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 9401-9410 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mondal

The higher-order JT coupling terms (beyond the standard second-order JT theory) are important to understand the first photoelectron band of AlH4.


2004 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 4603-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Viel ◽  
Wolfgang Eisfeld

2008 ◽  
Vol 347 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 110-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Faraji ◽  
Horst Köppel ◽  
Wolfgang Eisfeld ◽  
Susanta Mahapatra

1990 ◽  
Vol 05 (09) ◽  
pp. 1723-1744
Author(s):  
J.A. HELAYËL-NETO ◽  
A. WILLIAM SMITH

Arbitrary (1, 1) and (1.0) two-dimensional nonlinear σ-models, modified by the addition of coupling terms which explicitly break supersymmetry, are studied. The geometrical meaning of these additional terms is discussed. Supergraph methods, suitably extended to include the case of broken supersymmetry, are set and employed in explicit higher-loop computations to keep track of the effect that the explicit breaking of supersymmetry has on the ultraviolet behavior of the originally supersymmetric models.


2005 ◽  
Vol 122 (20) ◽  
pp. 204317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Eisfeld ◽  
Alexandra Viel
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Povinelli ◽  
Gabrielle C. Glorioso ◽  
Shannon L. Kuznar ◽  
Mateja Pavlic

Abstract Hoerl and McCormack demonstrate that although animals possess a sophisticated temporal updating system, there is no evidence that they also possess a temporal reasoning system. This important case study is directly related to the broader claim that although animals are manifestly capable of first-order (perceptually-based) relational reasoning, they lack the capacity for higher-order, role-based relational reasoning. We argue this distinction applies to all domains of cognition.


Author(s):  
G.F. Bastin ◽  
H.J.M. Heijligers

Among the ultra-light elements B, C, N, and O nitrogen is the most difficult element to deal with in the electron probe microanalyzer. This is mainly caused by the severe absorption that N-Kα radiation suffers in carbon which is abundantly present in the detection system (lead-stearate crystal, carbonaceous counter window). As a result the peak-to-background ratios for N-Kα measured with a conventional lead-stearate crystal can attain values well below unity in many binary nitrides . An additional complication can be caused by the presence of interfering higher-order reflections from the metal partner in the nitride specimen; notorious examples are elements such as Zr and Nb. In nitrides containing these elements is is virtually impossible to carry out an accurate background subtraction which becomes increasingly important with lower and lower peak-to-background ratios. The use of a synthetic multilayer crystal such as W/Si (2d-spacing 59.8 Å) can bring significant improvements in terms of both higher peak count rates as well as a strong suppression of higher-order reflections.


Author(s):  
H. S. Kim ◽  
S. S. Sheinin

The importance of image simulation in interpreting experimental lattice images is well established. Normally, in carrying out the required theoretical calculations, only zero order Laue zone reflections are taken into account. In this paper we assess the conditions for which this procedure is valid and indicate circumstances in which higher order Laue zone reflections may be important. Our work is based on an analysis of the requirements for obtaining structure images i.e. images directly related to the projected potential. In the considerations to follow, the Bloch wave formulation of the dynamical theory has been used.The intensity in a lattice image can be obtained from the total wave function at the image plane is given by: where ϕg(z) is the diffracted beam amplitide given by In these equations,the z direction is perpendicular to the entrance surface, g is a reciprocal lattice vector, the Cg(i) are Fourier coefficients in the expression for a Bloch wave, b(i), X(i) is the Bloch wave excitation coefficient, ϒ(i)=k(i)-K, k(i) is a Bloch wave vector, K is the electron wave vector after correction for the mean inner potential of the crystal, T(q) and D(q) are the transfer function and damping function respectively, q is a scattering vector and the summation is over i=l,N where N is the number of beams taken into account.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document