Interval Timing in Spoken Lists of Words

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-508
Author(s):  
Fred Cummins

Isochronous interval production with discrete motor responses has been studied most intensively by using well-practiced tapping in a synchronization/continuation paradigm. Somewhat fewer studies have examined the timing of shorter sequences of intervals that may be susceptible to metrical grouping. I here look at the attempted isochronous production of lists of eight trochees and examine the resulting interval patterns both in terms of the Wing-Kristofferson model (A. M. Wing & A. B. Kristofferson, 1973) and Rosenbaum�s hierarchical timing model (D. A. Rosenbaum, S. B. Kenny, & M. A. Derr, 1983). In Experiment 1, readings are self- paced and done under conditions of uncertainty. The Wing-Kristofferson model is not applicable to the data, which more closely resemble data exhibiting hierarchical control of intervals. In Experiment 2, readings are paced, well-practiced, and done without uncertainty. Neither Wing and Kristofferson�s model nor Rosenbaum�s model adequately captures the serial dependencies observed, although under these conditions variability is greatly reduced. In both experiments, there are dependencies between nonadjacent intervals that neither model can yet account for.

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Tomassini ◽  
Diane Ruge ◽  
Joseph M. Galea ◽  
William Penny ◽  
Sven Bestmann

The temporal preparation of motor responses to external events (temporal preparation) relies on internal representations of the accumulated elapsed time (temporal representations) before an event occurs and on estimates about its most likely time of occurrence (temporal expectations). The precision (inverse of uncertainty) of temporal preparation, however, is limited by two sources of uncertainty. One is intrinsic to the nervous system and scales with the length of elapsed time such that temporal representations are least precise for longest time durations. The other is external and arises from temporal variability of events in the outside world. The precision of temporal expectations thus decreases if events become more variable in time. It has long been recognized that the processing of time durations within the range of hundreds of milliseconds (interval timing) strongly depends on dopaminergic (DA) transmission. The role of DA for the precision of temporal preparation in humans, however, remains unclear. This study therefore directly assesses the role of DA in the precision of temporal preparation of motor responses in healthy humans. In a placebo-controlled double-blind design using a selective D2-receptor antagonist (sulpiride) and D1/D2 receptor antagonist (haloperidol), participants performed a variable foreperiod reaching task, under different conditions of internal and external temporal uncertainty. DA blockade produced a striking impairment in the ability of extracting temporal expectations across trials and on the precision of temporal representations within a trial. Large Weber fractions for interval timing, estimated by fitting subjective hazard functions, confirmed that this effect was driven by an increased uncertainty in the way participants were experiencing time. This provides novel evidence that DA regulates the precision with which we process time when preparing for an action.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naresh Kumar ◽  
Parag Bhatnagar ◽  
N. K. Agarwal ◽  
P. S. Bhatnagar

Author(s):  
Shuo Zhou ◽  
Yi Zhu ◽  
Yuanfang Hu ◽  
Ronald Graham ◽  
Mike Hutton ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shuo Zhou ◽  
Yi Zhu ◽  
Yuanfang Hu ◽  
Ronald Graham ◽  
Mike Hutton ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Martin ◽  
Gerald M. Siegel

Seventy-two college students were divided into three groups: Button Push-Speech (BP-S), Speech-Button Push (S-BP), and Control. BP-S subjects pushed one of two buttons on signal for 8 min. During the last 4 min, depression of the criterion button caused a buzzer to sound. After the button-push task, subjects spoke spontaneously for 30 min. During the last 20 min, the buzzer was presented contingent upon each disfluency. S-BP subjects were run under the same procedures, but the order of button-push and speech tasks was reversed. Control subjects followed the same procedures as S-BP subjects, but no buzzer signal was presented at any time. Both S-BP and BP-S subjects emitted significantly fewer disfluencies during the last 20 min (Conditioning) than during the first 10 min (Baserate) of the speaking task. The frequency of disfluencies for Control subjects did not change significantly from Baserate to Conditioning. In none of the three groups did the frequency of pushes on the criterion button change significantly from minute to minute throughout the 8-min button-push session.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document