scholarly journals Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in a Patient with Mirror-Image Dextrocardia and Situs Inversus

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Jiang ◽  
Heng Zhang ◽  
Mingyang Qian
Keyword(s):  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Situs Inversus ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Mirror Image ◽  
Percutaneous Closure ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Reversed Rotation ◽  
Ischemic Attack

A 26-year-old patient with mirror-image dextrocardia and situs inversus experienced a transient ischemic attack. We suspected that a patent foramen ovale was the reason. A Cardi-O-Fix occluder was used to close the patent foramen ovale with a mirror-reversed rotation of the radiologic views. During the 18-month follow-up, no symptoms of the transient ischemic attack appeared again.

scholarly journals Importance of Persistent Right-to-Left Shunt After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-249
Author(s):  
Lu He ◽  
Gesheng Cheng ◽  
Yajuan Du ◽  
Yushun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Valsalva Maneuver ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Atrial Septal Aneurysm ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Pfo Closure

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is widely performed to prevent recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with cryptogenic stroke. However, the influence of different degrees of right-to-left shunting (RLS) has rarely been reported. We retrospectively evaluated the cases of 268 patients with cryptogenic stroke who underwent PFO closure at our hospital from April 2012 through April 2015. In accordance with RLS severity, we divided the patients into 2 groups: persistent RLS during normal breathing and the Valsalva maneuver (n=112) and RLS only during the Valsalva maneuver (n=156). Baseline characteristics, morphologic features, and procedural and follow-up data were reviewed. The primary endpoint was stroke or transient ischemic attack. More patients in the persistent group had multiple or bilateral ischemic lesions, as well as a larger median PFO diameter (2.5 mm [range, 1.8–3.9 mm]) than did patients in the Valsalva maneuver group (1.3 mm [range, 0.9–1.9 mm]) (P <0.001). Atrial septal aneurysm was more frequent in the persistent group: 25 patients (22.3%) compared with 18 (11.5%) (P=0.018). Three patients in the persistent group had residual shunting. The annual risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was similar between groups: 0.298% (persistent) and 0.214% (Valsalva maneuver). Our findings suggest that patients with persistent RLS have more numerous severe ischemic lesions, larger PFOs, and a higher incidence of atrial septal aneurysm than do those without. Although our persistent group had a greater risk of residual shunting after PFO closure, recurrence of ischemic events did not differ significantly from that in the Valsalva maneuver group.

scholarly journals Patent foramen ovale closure by using transesophageal echocardiography for cryptogenic stroke: single center experience in 132 consecutive patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangyang Han ◽  
Xiquan Zhang ◽  
Fengwei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Contrast Agents ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Percutaneous Closure ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Pfo Closure

Abstract Background Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is routinely performed using plain fluoroscopy in the catheter room. This method results in inevitable radiation damage, adverse effects of contrast agents on kidneys, and high cost. We performed PFO closure with a simplified and economical transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-only guided approach in the operating room. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the percutaneous closure of PFO by only using TEE. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure at our center from December 2013 to December 2017. A total of 132 patients with PFO and cryptogenic strokes underwent PFO closure by using cardi-O-fix PFO device under TEE guidance. The participants comprised 64 and 68 male and female patients, respectively. The mean age and body weight of the patients were 39.40 ± 13.22 years old (12–68 years old) and 65.42 ± 9.70 kg (40–95 kg), respectively. All patients only received aspirin (3–5 mg/kg body weight, oral administration) for 6 months. Contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) with Valsalva maneuver was performed during follow-up, and questionnaire surveys were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Results All (100%) patients were successfully closed. Follow-ups were conducted for 13 months to 48 months, with an average of 27 months. No severe complications were found during the follow-up period. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurred in 4 patients within 3 months after the procedure. No recurrent stroke or death occurred in all patients during the follow-up period. Transient ischemic attack occurred in one patient 6 months after the procedure. Ten (7.6%) patients had a right-to-left shunt, as demonstrated by c-TTE at 12 months of follow-up. Among the 57 patients suffering from migraine, significant relief or resolution was reported by 42 (73.7%) patients. Conclusion TEE-only guided PFO closure was a safe, feasible, and effective method that did not require the use of X-rays and contrast agents.

scholarly journals Antithrombotic Treatment in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3135-3140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Sagris ◽  
Georgios Georgiopoulos ◽  
Kalliopi Perlepe ◽  
Konstantinos Pateras ◽  
Eleni Korompoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Antiplatelet Treatment ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background and Purpose— It is unclear whether treatment with anticoagulants or antiplatelets is the optimal strategy in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack of undetermined cause and patent foramen ovale that is not percutaneously closed. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment in this population. Methods— We searched PubMed until July 16, 2019 for trials comparing anticoagulants and antiplatelet treatment in patients with stroke/transient ischemic attack and medically treated patent foramen ovale using the terms: “cryptogenic or embolic stroke of undetermined source” and “stroke or cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack” and “patent foramen ovale or patent foramen ovale or paradoxical embolism” and “trial or study” and “antithrombotic or anticoagulant or antiplatelet.” The outcomes assessed were stroke recurrence, major bleeding, and the composite end point of stroke recurrence or major bleeding. We used 3 random-effects models: (1) a reference model based on the inverse variance method with the Sidik and Jonkman heterogeneity estimator; (2) a strict model, implementing the Hartung and Knapp method; and (3) a commonly used Bayesian model with a prior that assumes moderate to large between-study variance. Results— Among 112 articles identified in the literature search, 5 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis (1720 patients, mean follow-up 2.3±0.5 years). Stroke recurrence occurred at a rate of 1.73 per 100 patient-years in anticoagulant-assigned patients and 2.39 in antiplatelet-assigned patients (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.32–1.48 for the Sidik and Jonkman estimator). Major bleeding occurred at a rate of 1.16 per 100 patient-years in anticoagulant-assigned patients and 0.68 in antiplatelet-assigned patients (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.72–3.59 for the Sidik and Jonkman estimator). The composite outcome occurred in 52 anticoagulant-assigned and 54 antiplatelet-assigned patients (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65–1.70 for the Sidik and Jonkman estimator). Conclusions— We cannot exclude a large reduction of stroke recurrence in anticoagulant-assigned patients compared with antiplatelet-assigned, without significant differences in major bleeding. An adequately powered randomized controlled trial of a non–vitamin K antagonist versus aspirin is warranted.

P3721Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after treatment of patent foramen ovale with two transcatheter occlusion devices: mononcenter observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Almalla ◽  
J Schroeder ◽  
E Altiok ◽  
M N Alashkar ◽  
A Kirschfink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Percutaneous Treatment ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Transcatheter Occlusion ◽  
Occlusion Device ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Occluder Device ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Abstract Background Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) after cryptogenic stroke (CS) is strongly recommended in the current guidelines. Most available evidence has been obtained from randomized studies in which Amplatzer PFO occluder device or Groe occluder device were implanted. Several occluder devices are used off-label for percutaneous treatment of PFO. Rate of recurrent CS and rate of residual shunting after percutaneously occlusion of PFO varies between different occlusion devices. To date, there are no randomized clinical studies that compare the effectivity and safety of several devices in patients with CS. Aim The aim of this study was to compare rate of residual shunting and recurrent CS after percutaneus treatment of PFO with the most common used PFO occluder devises. Methods This was a retrospective, non-randomized, monocenter study. Between 2008 and 2014, all patients with CS or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with transcatheter occlusion of PFO with Amplatzer PFO occlusion device or Occlutech occlusion device were included. Patients were followed up at 1 and 6 months with contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and at 3 months with contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography. Primary endpoint was residual shunting at 6 months. Secondary endpoint was recurrent CS or TIA at 6 months after the procedure. Results 220 consecutive patients (57±12 year, 131 men) were treated with Amplanz PFO occlusion device (140 patients) or Occlutech PFO occlusion device (80 patients) after CS or TIA. Procedural success was 100% in both groups. Residual shunting was observed directly after the procedure in 26 patients in the Amplatzer group and 22 patients in the Occlutech group (19% and 27%, respectively; p=0.003), at 1 months follow (15% and 25%, respectively; p=0.064) and at 6 months (9% and 16%, respectively; p=0.024). There was no significant difference between both groups according recurrent CS (0.7% and 0%, respectively; p=0.449). At 6 months follow up atrial fibrillation was detected in 2 patients from Amplatzer group and 5 patients from Occlutech group (1.4% and 6.0%, respectively; p=0.050). Death, aortic erosion and pericardial effusion was not observed in both groups. Clinical and echocardiographic outcome Variable Amplatzer occluder device (N=140) Occlutech occluder device (N=80) p-value Clinical outcome at 6 months follow up   Death, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.000   Stroke, n (%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 0.449   Transient ischemic attack, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.000   Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 2 (1.4%) 5 (6%) 0.050   Aortic erosion, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.000   Pericardial effusion, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.000 Echocardiographic Outcome at 6 months follow up   Residual shunting after Implantation directly, n (%) 26 (19%) 22 (27%) 0.003   Residual shunting at one month, n (%) 21 (15%) 20 (25%) 0.064   Residual shunting at 6 months, n (%) 13 (9%) 16 (20%) 0.024 Conclusion Percutaneous treatment of PFO after CS or TIA with Amplatzer PFO occluder device was associated with lower rate of residual shunting and lower rate of atrial fibrillation at 6 months follow up, whereas rate of recurrent CS and TIA was comparable between both groups.

Very long-term follow-up after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1474-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Eeckhout ◽  
Solenne Martin ◽  
Alain Delabays ◽  
Patrik Michel ◽  
Grégoire Girod
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Percutaneous Closure ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Long Term Follow Up
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document