Spotlight on Sibling Involvement in Schizophrenia Treatment

Psychiatry ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary V. Seeman
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja van Langenberg ◽  
Rony E. Duncan ◽  
J. Sabura Allen ◽  
Susan M. Sawyer ◽  
Daniel Le Grange ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan M. Burke ◽  
Chung eun Lee ◽  
Catherine K. Arnold ◽  
Aleksa Owen

Abstract Adult siblings of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) report struggling to navigate the adult disability service delivery system and collaborate with professionals. To date, though, it is unclear how professionals encourage sibling involvement and, accordingly, the facilitators and challenges in working with siblings. For this study, 290 professionals participated in a national web-based survey; participants answered three open-ended questions about ways to involve siblings, positive experiences with siblings, and challenges in working with siblings. Professionals reported person-level and systems-level supports to encourage sibling involvement. Also, professionals reported enjoying working with cohesive families of individuals with IDD and witnessing the benefits that siblings bring to their brothers and sisters with IDD. Challenges in working with siblings included: lack of sibling involvement, systemic barriers, and caregiving burden. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.


1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Lockwood ◽  
Barry P. Frost

This paper analyses the Family Relations Test protocols of 197 eleven-year-old boys with respect to the dimension of “most-mentioned family member” and of 141 of these boys with respect to “choice of sibling”. The sample was drawn from boys referred for school problems. The results show that (a) the mean and frequency methods of calculating the most-mentioned family member do not differ greatly; however, the latter is to be preferred on grounds of greater psychological meaning; (b) in this sample of referred boys, a sibling is the most-mentioned family member; (c) there is a significant difference between the mean number of items given to Mother and Father by eleven-year-old boys in the referred group as compared with a normative group; (d) subjects from small families are not more involved with their parents than are subjects from large families; (e) boys from large families do not give more items to their next oldest and/or their next youngest siblings as compared with siblings in other ordinal positions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Giovanola

1996 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Pruchno ◽  
Julie Hicks Patrick ◽  
Christopher J. Burant

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 759-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget M. Wright ◽  
Joann P. Benigno

Purpose There is currently a very limited scope of research in the field of speech-language pathology on sibling involvement in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Principles of family systems theory (FST) recognize the interrelatedness and dynamic nature of the family unit, making it a relevant and useful guiding framework for future research and practice on sibling involvement in intervention. Method In this article, core principles of FST are reviewed, followed by the state of research related to sibling relationships in ASD, and roles of typically developing siblings and siblings with ASD in intervention programs. Implications for adopting an FST framework as well as considerations and future directions in this area of research and clinical practice are discussed. Results According to the principles of FST on the inclusion of siblings in treatment, there are several considerations to be made at the level of the child with ASD, the sibling(s), and the family unit. Factors such as developmental level, communication status, and areas of strength, challenge, and interest are key features of the children and family that will need to be addressed in order to promote positive sibling involvement and family functioning. Conclusions The development of family-centered sibling intervention programs for individuals with ASD is an area of research that warrants further exploration. With the guidance of the FST framework, researchers and clinicians can work to develop innovative interventions that consider the unique characteristics of each family to optimize outcomes at the levels of each individual, the sibling relationship, and the family as a unit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document