Identifying Potential Moderators of ADHD Summer Treatment Program Outcomes: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Craig Sidol ◽  
Jeffery N. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Summer Treatment Program

The Adverse Effects of Motherhood on Substance Use Treatment Program Outcomes Among Adolescent Women

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah J. Savage ◽  
Nefertiti Durant ◽  
C. Brendan Clark ◽  
Parvathy Nair ◽  
Karen Cropsey
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Substance Use Treatment ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Adolescent Women

Attributions and Perception of Methylphenidate Effects in Adolescents With ADHD

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Pelham ◽  
Elizabeth M. Gnagy ◽  
Margaret H. Sibley ◽  
Heidi L. Kipp ◽  
Bradley H. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attributional Style ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Stimulant Medication ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Children With Adhd ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Summer Treatment Program ◽  
Active Medication ◽  
History Of ◽  
Medication Status

Objective: Although a number of studies demonstrate that children with ADHD do not attribute their behavior to taking medication, it remains unstudied whether adolescents, who have a longer history of taking medication for ADHD, show performance attributions to medication. Method: A sample of 46 adolescents completed daily attributions for success or failure as a part of their participation in a summer treatment program with a double-blind, placebo-controlled assessment of methylphenidate. Results: Results demonstrated that adolescents with ADHD did not reliably discern active medication from placebo, rarely attributed their performance to the pill, and showed no differences in attributional style as a function of medication status. Conclusion: These data indicate that adolescents with ADHD may possess inaccurate beliefs about the effect of stimulant medication on their behavior.

P-306 - Adolescent day treatment program: outcomes and follow-up study

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lakusta ◽  
C. Wilkes ◽  
S. Malhotra ◽  
G. Vaz ◽  
D. Cawthorpe
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Program ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Day Treatment Program

scholarly journals A systematic review of global surgery partnerships and a proposed framework for sustainability

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. E280-E288
Author(s):  
Nicole Jedrzejko ◽  
Joseph Margolick ◽  
Jenny Hoang Nguyen ◽  
Maylynn Ding ◽  
Phyllis Kisa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Community Engagement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Global Surgery ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Multidisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Training Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: Building surgical capacity through global surgery partnerships (GSPs) between high and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is a rising global health focus. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review to characterize strategies employed by GSPs to build capacity and promote sustainability and to propose a novel reproducible model for sustainability. Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and African Journals Online to identify all peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2016 that described GSPs between partners from the United States or Canada or both and partners from LMICs. We excluded papers that described nonsurgical GSPs, unilateral GSPs (e.g., humanitarian missions) or military initiatives. Descriptive features were analyzed, with a focus on attributes that promote sustainability. We then proposed criteria for sustainability on the basis of the themes that emerged from our review. Results: Our search retrieved 3580 abstracts, which were then independently reviewed by 4 authors. A total of 128 papers (3.6%) met the inclusion criteria. They described GSPs in 68 countries on 5 continents. Among the GSPs, 21.9% demonstrated community engagement and 51.6% included multidisciplinary collaboration. Surgical training or education was provided in 81.3% of GSPs. Although 64.8% of GSPs collected data, only 53.1% reported project-related outcomes. A total of 55.5% had bilateral authorship for publications, and 28.9% had multisource funding. Only 1 GSP fulfilled all 6 of our criteria for sustainability. Conclusion: In this systematic review we identified 6 pillars that are indicators of sustainability: community engagement, multidisciplinary collaboration, education and training, outcomes reporting, bilateral authorship and multisource funding. We propose that future GSPs should build on a foundation of bilateral ideas and expertise exchange, that they should have defined and measurable objectives, that they should engage in continuous evaluation of program outcomes and that they should take a thoughtful and transparent approach to sustained capacity building.

A Pilot Study of Emotional Response to Time-Out in Children With Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 2017-2037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pevitr S. Bansal ◽  
Sarah M. Haas ◽  
Michael T. Willoughby ◽  
Erika K. Coles ◽  
William E. Pelham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Conduct Problems ◽  
Treatment Program ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Negative Behaviors ◽  
Summer Treatment Program ◽  
Callous Unemotional ◽  
Callous Unemotional Traits ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Unemotional Traits

Little research has examined how children with conduct problems and concurrent callous-unemotional traits (CPCU) emotionally and behaviorally respond to time-out. This pilot study examined the distribution and stability of emotions during time-out as well as the association between emotions and negative behaviors. Participants were 11 children ( Mage = 9.8 years) with CPCU who participated in a summer treatment program designed specifically for children with CPCU. Summer treatment program counselors rated each child’s emotion when time-out was first assigned and then as the time-out progressed and indicated whether the child had negative behavior during time-out. These ratings were completed for approximately 30% of time-outs that occurred. Results showed that children were mostly rated as “unemotional” or “calm” and that these emotions were relatively stable throughout time-out. Furthermore, negative behaviors were most common during time-outs when children’s emotions were rated as “amused.” Results provide groundwork for future research to extend upon the methods used in the current study to further examine the emotional and behavioral response to time-out in children with CPCU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document