Evaluation of a Modified Guar OD Formulation for Spray Drift Mitigation

2011 ◽  
pp. 149-149-17
Author(s):  
Alan Halecky ◽  
Johnnie Roberts ◽  
Kevin Penfield ◽  
Trey Baker
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift

Cotton Resistance to 2,4‐Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid Spray Drift 1

Crop Science ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 376-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecil Regier ◽  
R. E. Dilbeck ◽  
D. J. Undersander ◽  
J. E. Quisenberry
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid

Spray Drift Deposition Comparison of Fluorimetry and Analytical Confirmation Techniques

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpad Z. Szarka ◽  
Greg R. Kruger ◽  
Jeff Golus ◽  
Carol Rodgers ◽  
Daniel Perkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift

Effects of glyphosate spray-drift on plant flowering

2021 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 116953
Author(s):  
B. Strandberg ◽  
P.B. Sørensen ◽  
M. Bruus ◽  
R. Bossi ◽  
Y.L. Dupont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift

Determination of pendimethalin (PROWL®480 EC) spray drift from ground applications

1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 969-985
Author(s):  
B. J. Harris ◽  
B. Reliford ◽  
G. Annette ◽  
K. Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift

Can Spray Drift be Reduced?

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  
Graham Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift

AERIAL SPRAY DRIFT FROM DIFFERENT FORMULATIONS OF GLYPHOSATE

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 555-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. W. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift

Spray Drift and Recovery As Affected by Spray Thickener, Nozzle Type, and Nozzle Pressure

1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 0213-0218 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Bode ◽  
B. J. Butler ◽  
C. E. Goering
Keyword(s):  
Spray Drift ◽  
Nozzle Pressure ◽  
Nozzle Type

scholarly journals Study of a test methodology to assess potential drift generated by air-assisted sprayers

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (2s) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Balsari ◽  
Paolo Marucco ◽  
Claudio Bozzer ◽  
Mario Tamagnone
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Sustainable Use ◽  
Spray Drift ◽  
Field Crop ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Pesticide Application ◽  
Buffer Zones ◽  
Iso Standard ◽  
Test Methodology

During pesticide application spray drift may cause diffuse pollution phenomena in the environment. In the last years the European Union, through the Directive on the sustainable use of pesticides (128/2009 EC), has recommended the adoption of measures enabling to prevent spray drift. Among these measures, the adoption of buffer zones beside the sprayed fields requires to consider different widths for these no spray zones according to the amount of spray drift generated by the spraying equipment used for application. It is therefore necessary to classify the different sprayer models according to drift risk. For what concerns the sprayers used on arboreal crops, in order to make this classification in a simple and quick way as it was already proposed for the field crop sprayers (ISO FDIS 22369-3), a study was started aimed at defining a methodology to assess potential drift produced by the different sprayer models in absence of wind, using ad hoc test benches. On the basis of the positive first experimental data obtained, a first proposal for a new ISO standard methodology was prepared.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document