Deformation Plasticity Failure Assessment Diagram

2008 ◽  
pp. 114-114-14
Author(s):  
JM Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Deformation Plasticity

Deformation Plasticity Failure Assessment Diagram (DPFAD) for Materials With Non-Ramberg-Osgood Stress-Strain Curves

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Stress ◽  
Manganese Steel ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
J Integral ◽  
Stress Strain ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Strain Data ◽  
Deformation Plasticity ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Stress

This paper presents a brief history of the evolution of the Central Electricity Generating Board’s (CEGB) R-6 failure assessment diagram (FAD) procedure used in assessing defects in structural components. The reader is taken from the original CEGB R-6 FAD strip yield model to the deformation plastic failure assessment diagram (DPFAD), which is dependent on Ramberg-Osgood (R-O) materials to general stress-strain curves. An extension of the DPFAD approach is given which allows the use of material stress-strain data which do not follow the R-O equation such as stainless steel or carbon manganese steel. The validity of the new approach coined piecewise failure assessment diagram (PWFAD) is demonstrated through comparisons with the J-integral responses (expressed in terms of failure assessment diagram curves) for several cracked configurations of non-R-O materials. The examples were taken from both finite element and experimental results. The comparisons with these test cases demonstrate the accuracy of PWFAD. The use of PWFAD requires the availability of deformation plasticity J-integral solutions for several values of the strain-hardening exponent as well as uniaxial tensile stress-strain data at the temperature of interest. Lacking this information, the original R-O DPFAD approach using known engineering yield and ultimate strengths would give the best available approximation. However, it is strongly recommended that actual uniaxial tensile stress-strain data be used when available.

Validation of the Deformation Plasticity Failure Assessment Diagram (DPFAD) Approach—The Case of an Axial Flaw in a Pressurized Cylinder

1990 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Crack Depth ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Inside Surface ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Steel Technology ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Deformation Plasticity ◽  
Structural Tests ◽  
Structural Configurations ◽  
Pressurized Cylinder

The validation of the deformation plasticity failure assessment diagram (DPFAD) approach for application to the prediction of failure pressures for pipes or pressure vessels with axial flaws is addressed in this paper. The DPFAD approach has been extensively documented with regard to its validity in open literature for various configurations of test specimens. For actual structural configurations, however, no such comparisons appear in open literature. In particular, the model of a part-through wall axial flaw in a pressurized cylinder has not been validated through comparisons with actual structural tests results. Two sources of test data from structural tests of axially flawed pressurized cylinders were evaluated. • Heavy-Section Steel Technology (HSST) intermediate test vessels. • Eiber/Battelle Columbus Laboratories (BCL) axially cracked pipes. The DPFAD axial flaw model was developed using finite-element results to generate calibration constants as functions of crack depth to wall thickness and crack depth to crack length for an axially oriented semi-elliptical flaw on the inside surface of a pressurized cylinder. The calibration constants were then used to generate failure assessment curves that can be used to assess or predict failure of pipes or vessels with axial flaws under pressure loading. A key assumption in the analysis was the use of the failure assessment curve for the inside surface flaw in the prediction of outside-surface-flawed cylinder failures. Based on the excellent results from the comparisons with predicted failures to actual vessel and pipe failures, this assumption was found to be reasonable. Furthermore, based on predicted test results of the HSST vessel tests and the Eiber/BCL pipe tests, it was concluded that the DPFAD semi-elliptical axial flaw model can be used reliably in assessing part-through flaws in pressurized vessels and pipes.

Extensions of the Failure Assessment Diagram Approach Semi-Elliptical Flaw in Pressurized Cylinders—Part II

1986 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Closed Form ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Strain Hardening Exponent ◽  
J Integral ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Aspect Ratios ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Deformation Plasticity ◽  
Estimation Scheme ◽  
Pressurized Cylinder

Approximate closed-form J-integral expressions based on the estimation scheme for use in the Deformation Plasticity Failure Assessment Diagram (DPFAD) approach are presented for an axially oriented semi-elliptical flaw in a pressurized cylinder for crack depth to wall thickness ratios, a/t, from 1/4 to 3/4 and aspect ratios, a/l, from 0 to 1/2. The DPFAD approach was used to derive closed-form J-integral expressions from limited elastic-plastic finite element solutions. Results are also presented in terms of the DPFAD curves as functions of a/t and a/l for the strain-hardening exponent of n = 8.6. Curves are given for the calibration constant h1 as a function of a/t and a/l for ease of interpolation. Lastly, discussion is provided as to the applicability of the solutions and a possible interpolation scheme for obtaining h1 values for n other than 8.6.

A Procedure for the Assessment of the Structural Integrity of Nuclear Pressure Vessels

1983 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Plastic Collapse ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Linear Elastic ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Deformation Plasticity ◽  
Margin Of Safety ◽  
Two Parameters

This paper presents a simple engineering procedure that the utility industry can use to assess the integrity of typical nuclear-grade pressure vessels. The procedure recognizes both brittle fracture and plastic collapse and is based on a set of proposed failure assessment curves which make up a safety/failure plane. The plane is defined by the stress intensity factor/fracture toughness ratio as the ordinate and the applied stress/reference plastic collapse stress ratio as the abscissa. The failure assessment procedure is based in part on the British Central Electricity Generating Board’s R-6 failure assessment diagram and the deformation plasticity solutions of the General Electric Company. Two parameters, a plastic collapse parameter (Sr′) and linear elastic fracture mechanics parameter (Kr′) are calculated by the user. The point (Sr′, Kr′) is plotted on the appropriate failure assessment diagram. If the point lies inside the respective curve, the structure is safe from failure. Moreover, for a given pressure and a postulated or actual flaw size, the margin of safety of the structure can be simply determined. Consistent with Appendix A of Section XI, (Division 1) of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code the procedure presented in this paper is limited to ferritic materials 4 in. (102 mm) and greater in thickness. Details of the derivation of the proposed set of failure assessment curves are provided along with a sample problem illustrating the use of these curves.

Estimation of the V-Factor for Circumferentially Cracked Pipes Under Combined Thermal and Mechanical Stresses Using a Strain-Based Failure Assessment Diagram

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Young Oh ◽  
Yun-Jae Kim ◽  
Dong-il Ryu ◽  
P. J. Budden ◽  
R. A. Ainsworth
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Thermal Load ◽  
Thermal Stresses ◽  
Mechanical Stresses ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Finite Element Analyses ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Dimensional Finite Element

This paper presents finite element solutions for elastic-plastic J for circumferentially cracked pipes under combined mechanical and thermal loads in terms of the V/Vo factor used within a strain-based failure assessment diagram. In this study, 3-dimensional finite element analyses are conducted to calculate the V-factor under combined mechanical and thermal load. It is found that estimation of V/Vo is sensitive to the method used for its evaluation. For larger thermal stresses, currently proposed estimation methods are overly conservative.

Defective Pipeline Fatigue-Life Prediction Using Failure Assessment Diagram Technique

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinheng Luo ◽  
Xinwei Zhao ◽  
Qingren Xiong ◽  
Chunyong Huo
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Life Prediction ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Load Ratio ◽  
Test System ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Oil Pipeline ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment

The life prediction, whose results can be used to define the inspection, repair or replacement cycle of in-service pipeline, is a main component of safety assessment of gas and oil pipeline. At present, failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) technique has been widely used in quantitative engineering safety evaluation system of pipeline that contains crack-like flaws. In past work, the authors developed a very useful model to predict the fatigue life of defective pipeline and established a computer calculating method. Based on FAD technique, toughness ratio and load ratio are calculated repeatedly with every crack increment in the model. With the self-developed full-scale test system, the full-scale pipe fatigue test was collected to verify the applicability of this method.

scholarly journals Corrosion defect harmfulness by domain failure assessment diagram

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pluvinage ◽  
◽  
O. Bouledroua ◽  
M. H. Meliani ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corrosion Defect ◽  
Failure Assessment Diagram ◽  
Failure Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document