Fitting Models to Composite Materials Fatigue Data

Author(s):  
GP Sendeckyj
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 1183-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asim Shahzad ◽  
Sana Ullah Nasir

Empirical model for predicting fatigue damage behavior of composite materials developed recently has been applied to composite materials made of different fibers in various configurations: carbon and glass fiber noncrimp fabric reinforced epoxy composites, chopped strand mat glass fiber-reinforced polyester composites, randomly oriented nonwoven hemp fiber-reinforced polyester composites, and glass/hemp fiber-reinforced polyester hybrid composites. The fatigue properties were evaluated in tension–tension mode at stress ratio R = 0.1 and frequency of 1 Hz. The experimental fatigue data were used to determine the material parameters required for the model. It has been found that the model accurately predicts the degradation of fatigue life of composites with an increase in number of fatigue cycles. The scope of applicability of this model has thus been broadened by using the fatigue data of natural fiber and noncrimp fabric composites.


Author(s):  
IR Farrow

Fatigue damage accumulation and analysis methods are considered for composites and contrasted with metals. The failure of current analysis methods is illustrated and explained by the information missing in load idealization data. Detailed local strain operational monitoring with local strain fatigue data is proposed as a future approach to fatigue life assessment of composite materials under aircraft service loading.


Author(s):  
R.R. Russell

Transmission electron microscopy of metallic/intermetallic composite materials is most challenging since the microscopist typically has great difficulty preparing specimens with uniform electron thin areas in adjacent phases. The application of ion milling for thinning foils from such materials has been quite effective. Although composite specimens prepared by ion milling have yielded much microstructural information, this technique has some inherent drawbacks such as the possible generation of ion damage near sample surfaces.


Author(s):  
K.P.D. Lagerlof

Although most materials contain more than one phase, and thus are multiphase materials, the definition of composite materials is commonly used to describe those materials containing more than one phase deliberately added to obtain certain desired physical properties. Composite materials are often classified according to their application, i.e. structural composites and electronic composites, but may also be classified according to the type of compounds making up the composite, i.e. metal/ceramic, ceramic/ceramie and metal/semiconductor composites. For structural composites it is also common to refer to the type of structural reinforcement; whisker-reinforced, fiber-reinforced, or particulate reinforced composites [1-4].For all types of composite materials, it is of fundamental importance to understand the relationship between the microstructure and the observed physical properties, and it is therefore vital to properly characterize the microstructure. The interfaces separating the different phases comprising the composite are of particular interest to understand. In structural composites the interface is often the weakest part, where fracture will nucleate, and in electronic composites structural defects at or near the interface will affect the critical electronic properties.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. N. Kablov ◽  
L. V. Chursova ◽  
A. N. Babin ◽  
R. R. Mukhametov ◽  
N. N. Panina

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document