Elevated-Temperature Low Cycle and Thermomechanical Fatigue Properties of AISI H13 Hot-Work Tool Steel

2009 ◽  
pp. 576-576-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Engberg ◽  
L Larsson
Keyword(s):  
Elevated Temperature ◽  
Tool Steel ◽  
Thermomechanical Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Properties ◽  
Hot Work Tool Steel ◽  
Aisi H13

Thermal fatigue study of tungsten alloy WNi28Fe15 cladded on AISI H13 hot work tool steel

2016 ◽  
Vol 285 ◽  
pp. 304-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Skumavc ◽  
Janez Tušek ◽  
Aleš Nagode ◽  
Damjan Klobčar
Keyword(s):  
Tool Steel ◽  
Thermal Fatigue ◽  
Tungsten Alloy ◽  
Hot Work Tool Steel ◽  
Aisi H13

scholarly journals Effect of Testing Atmosphere on Low Cycle Fatigue of Hot Work Tool Steel at Elevated Temperature.

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 920-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Tsujii ◽  
Genryu Abe ◽  
Kenzo Fukaura ◽  
Hisakichi Sunada
Keyword(s):  
Elevated Temperature ◽  
Tool Steel ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Hot Work Tool Steel

AISI H13 Hot-Work Steel with Hard Chromium Plating Thermal Fatigue Behavior Evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 849 ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Hung Yeh ◽  
Liu Ho Chiu ◽  
Shou Chi Lin ◽  
Yeong Tsuen Pan
Keyword(s):  
Tool Steel ◽  
Thermal Fatigue ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Microstructural Analysis ◽  
Damage Factor ◽  
Hard Chromium ◽  
Chromium Plating ◽  
Hot Work Tool Steel ◽  
Heat Treated ◽  
Aisi H13

A hard-coating on hot work tool steel can be used to obtain higher corrosion resistance, as well as better wear resistance. This study investigates the thermal fatigue performance of AISI H13 hot work tool steel with and without hard chromium plating. Treated specimens were characterized using microstructural analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis and microhardness measurement. The thermal fatigue test is based on cyclic induction heating and water cooling. The specimen was heated to the maximum surface temperature of 670°C followed with water injection to bring the specimen down to a minimum temperature of 25°C. The thermal fatigue testing in this study was conducted using 500 cycles. A vacuum heat treated specimen with a hardness of 47 HRC was used as the reference material. The hard chromium plated layer with a thickness 35 μm had a hardness of 930 HV0.1. The damage factor, defined as crack depth × crack width, of quenched and tempered H13 specimens and hard chromium plated specimens were 800 and 1760, respectively. The damage factor evaluation verified the vacuum heat treated specimen thermal fatigue resistance is superior to that of the hard chromium plated specimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document