Fracture Toughness Testing of Weld Heat-Affected Zones in Structural Steel

2009 ◽  
pp. 117-117-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
DP Fairchild
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Structural Steel ◽  
Fracture Toughness Testing ◽  
Toughness Testing ◽  
Weld Heat

Fracture Toughness Testing of a Low Alloy Structural Steel Using Non-Standard Bend Specimens and an Exploratory Application to Determine the Reference Temperature, T0

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitor Scarabeli Barbosa ◽  
Claudio Ruggieri
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Structural Steel ◽  
Cleavage Fracture ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Fracture Toughness Testing ◽  
Loading Mode ◽  
Toughness Testing

This work addresses an experimental investigation on the cleavage fracture behavior of an ASTM A572 high strength, low alloy structural steel using standard and non-standard SE(B) specimens, including a non-standard PCVN configuration. One purpose of this study is to develop a fracture toughness test procedure applicable to bend geometries with varying specimen span over width ratio (a/W) and loaded under 3-point and 4-point flexural configuration. We provide a new set of plastic η-factors applicable to these non-standard bend geometries which serve to estimate the experimentally measured toughness values in terms of load-displacement records. Another purpose is to investigate the effects of geometry and loading mode in fracture tests using non-standard bend specimens. Fracture toughness testing conducted on various bend specimen geometries extracted from an A572 Grade 50 steel plate provides the cleavage fracture resistance data in terms of the J-integral at cleavage instability, Jc. The experimental results show a potential effect of specimen geometry and loading mode on Jc-values which can help mitigating the effects of constraint loss often observed in smaller fracture specimens. An exploratory application to determine the reference temperature, T0, derived from the Master Curve methodology also provides additional support for using non-standard bend specimens in routine fracture applications.

Fracture Toughness Testing and its Implications to Engineering Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Energy Pipelines

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Limon ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Mike Barnum ◽  
Robert Pilarczyk
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Fracture Mode ◽  
Fracture Process ◽  
Fracture Behavior ◽  
Fracture Initiation ◽  
Fracture Toughness Testing ◽  
Final Fracture ◽  
Toughness Testing

The fracture process of energy pipelines can be described in terms of fracture initiation, stable fracture propagation and final fracture or fracture arrest. Each of these stages, and the final fracture mode (leak or rupture), are directly impacted by the tendency towards brittle or ductile behavior that line pipe steels have the capacity to exhibit. Vintage and modern low carbon steels, such as those used to manufacture energy pipelines, exhibit a temperature-dependent transition from ductile-to-brittle behavior that affects the fracture behavior. There are numerous definitions of fracture toughness in common usage, depending on the stage of the fracture process and the behavior or fracture mode being evaluated. The most commonly used definitions in engineering fracture analysis of pipelines with cracks or long-seam weld defects are related to fracture initiation, stable propagation or final fracture. When choosing fracture toughness test data for use in engineering Fracture Mechanics-based assessments of energy pipelines, it is important to identify the stage of the fracture process and the expected fracture behavior in order to appropriately select test data that represent equivalent conditions. A mismatch between the physical fracture event being modeled and the chosen experimental fracture toughness data can result in unreliable predictions or overly conservative results. This paper presents a description of the physical fracture process, behavior and failure modes that pipelines commonly exhibit as they relate to fracture toughness testing, and their implications when evaluating cracks and cracks-like features in pipelines. Because pipeline operators, and practitioners of engineering Fracture Mechanics analyses, are often faced with the challenge of only having Charpy fracture toughness available, this paper also presents a review of the various correlations of Charpy toughness data to fracture toughness data expressed in terms of KIC or JIC. Considerations with the selection of an appropriate correlation for determining the failure pressure of pipelines in the presence of cracks and long-seam weld anomalies will be discussed.

Equipment for fracture toughness testing of specimen at low temperatures

1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 698-702
Author(s):  
I. D. Abushenkov ◽  
A. I. Alekseev ◽  
V. Ya. Il'ichev ◽  
N. I. Mokryi ◽  
A. I. Telegon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Low Temperatures ◽  
Fracture Toughness Testing ◽  
Toughness Testing

Forming mechanism of delamination cracks observed during tensile and fracture toughness testing of X70 pipeline steel

2017 ◽  
Vol 209 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Yeob Park ◽  
Babak Shalchi Amirkhiz ◽  
Jean-Philippe Gravel ◽  
Jie Liang ◽  
Renata Zavadil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pipeline Steel ◽  
X70 Pipeline Steel ◽  
Forming Mechanism ◽  
Fracture Toughness Testing ◽  
Toughness Testing ◽  
Delamination Cracks
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document