Description of Crack Growth Using the Strip-Yield Model for Computation of Crack Opening Loads, Crack Tip Stretch, and Strain Rates

2009 ◽  
pp. 459-459-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
AU de Koning ◽  
HJ ten Hoeve ◽  
TK Henriksen
Keyword(s):  
Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Opening ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
Yield Model ◽  
Strip Yield Model

Strip-Yield Modeling of Load-Time-Temperature Effects on Crack Growth in Engine Materials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Newman ◽  
Rani Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Stress Relaxation ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Crack Front ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Yield Model ◽  
Linear Superposition ◽  
Strip Yield Model ◽  
Creep Deformations

Abstract Plastic and creep deformations around a crack front and in the wake of a moving crack under cyclic loading are implemented into the life-prediction code, FASTRAN (a strip-yield model). Creep deformations are modeled by stress relaxation around the crack-tip location, since the crack-front material is under displacement control due to the surrounding elastic material. Sinusoidal and trapezoidal loading are considered. A modified linear superposition model was used to compute the cyclic- and time-dependent damage, which was based on the stress-intensity-factor concept for creep-brittle materials. Application of the modified strip-yield model was made on two sets of test data on Inconel-718 alloy. The environments were laboratory air or helium gas. From the literature, the “environment” had been shown to be a major contributor to damage magnitudes. Thus, the time-dependent crack-growth constants were selected to match the test data. In addition, the effects of a small overload on time-dependent damage, and the effects of stress relaxation and varying temperatures on crack-opening stresses and cyclic crack-tip-opening displacements, were studied.

Application of the Strip Yield Model to Crack Growth Predictions for Structural Steel

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Skorupa ◽  
Tomasz Machniewicz
Keyword(s):  
Structural Steel ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Load History ◽  
Yield Model ◽  
Variable Amplitude Loading ◽  
Variable Amplitude ◽  
Constraint Factors ◽  
Strip Yield Model ◽  
Closure Mechanism

Application of the Strip Yield Model to Crack Growth Predictions for Structural SteelA strip yield model implementation by the present authors is applied to predict fatigue crack growth observed in structural steel specimens under various constant and variable amplitude loading conditions. Attention is paid to the model calibration using the constraint factors in view of the dependence of both the crack closure mechanism and the material stress-strain response on the load history. Prediction capabilities of the model are considered in the context of the incompatibility between the crack growth resistance for constant and variable amplitude loading.

Comparison of Strip Yield and Net Section Plasticity Models for a Bar in Bending With a Single Edge Crack

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Reinhardt ◽  
Don Metzger
Keyword(s):  
Edge Crack ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Stress Singularity ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Single Edge ◽  
Yield Model ◽  
Strip Yield Model ◽  
Crack Tip Plasticity ◽  
Stress And Deformation

The strip yield model is widely used to describe crack tip plasticity in front of a crack. In the strip yield model the stress in the plastic zone is considered as known, and stress and deformation fields can be obtained from elastic solutions using the condition that the crack tip stress singularity vanishes. The strip yield model is generally regarded to be valid to describe small scale plasticity at a crack tip. The present paper examines the behavior of the strip yield model at the transition to large-scale plasticity and its relationship to net section plasticity descriptions. A bar in bending with a single edge crack is used as an illustrative example to derive solutions and compare with one-sided and two-sided plasticity solutions.

Explicit and Implicit Lifetime Assessment Methods of 9Cr-1Mo Steel Under Combined Creep and Fatigue Loads Using a Strip Yield Model

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Andrews ◽  
G. P. Potirniche
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Fatigue Crack ◽  
Fatigue Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Constitutive Equations ◽  
Crack Extension ◽  
Cyclic Loads ◽  
Yield Model ◽  
Creep Crack ◽  
Strip Yield Model

Growing demand for clean, affordable energy has driven the power industry towards generation plants with higher thermal efficiency and higher operating temperatures. ASTM Grade 91 is a high chromium (9Cr-1Mo) creep resistant steel commonly used in high temperature pressure vessel and piping applications. These service conditions often involve a combination of stationary and cyclic loads at elevated temperatures. Lifecycle assessments of components under such conditions require modeling of both creep and fatigue behaviors. This paper develops two approaches to modeling mixed creep and fatigue crack growth for lifetime assessment of high service temperature components. Both approaches model fatigue crack growth using the Paris law integrated over the number of lifetime cyclic reversals to obtain crack extension. A strip yield model is used to characterize the crack tip stress-strain fields. The first approach employed an explicit method to approximate creep crack growth using C* as a crack tip parameter characterizing creep crack extension. The Norton power law was explicitly solved to model the primary and secondary stages of creep. The second approach used an implicit method to solve a set of constitutive equations based on properties of the material microstructure to model all creep stages. Constitutive equations were fit to experimental data collected at stresses 10–60% of yield and temperatures 550–650°C. These methods were compared to published experimental data under purely stationary loads, purely cyclic loads and mixed loading. Both models showed good agreement with experimental data in the stress and temperature conditions considered.

J-Integral and Crack Opening Displacement as Crack Initiation Criteria in Rubber

1986 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Lee ◽  
J. A. Donovan
Keyword(s):  
Crack Initiation ◽  
Carbon Black ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Crack Opening ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
J Integral ◽  
Carbon Black Content ◽  
Opening Displacement ◽  
Critical Crack ◽  
Growth Initiation

Abstract 1. Evaluation of ∫σdδ where σ is the net section stress and δ is the deformed crack tip diameter requires only one specimen to characterize the initiation of crack growth in unfilled and carbon-black-filled NR. 2. ∫σdδ is equal to one half of the J-integral for crack growth initiation, which is identical to the Thomas tearing energy for a blunt notch. 3. The critical J-integral for crack initiation increases linearly with carbon black content. 4. The critical crack tip radius for crack initiation is independent of carbon black content, and the required crack tip region stress increases linearly with carbon black content.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document