Responses of Austenitic Stainless Steel American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) 303 (1.4305) Subjected to Different Environmental Conditions

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 104160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josip Brnic ◽  
Goran Turkalj ◽  
Marko Canadija ◽  
Domagoj Lanc ◽  
Sanjin Krscanski
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Environmental Conditions ◽  
Iron And Steel ◽  
Steel Institute

Some aspects of the defect structure in an austenitic stainless steel

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-315
Author(s):  
R. Gonzalez ◽  
L. Bru
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Cellular Structures ◽  
Total Strain Amplitude ◽  
Total Deformation ◽  
Density Of Dislocations ◽  
Planar Arrays ◽  
Stacking Fault Tetrahedra ◽  
Distribution Of Dislocations ◽  
Very High

The analysis of stacking fault tetrahedra (SFT) in fatigued metals (1,2) is somewhat complicated, due partly to their relatively low density, but principally to the presence of a very high density of dislocations which hides them. In order to overcome this second difficulty, we have used in this work an austenitic stainless steel that deforms in a planar mode and, as expected, examination of the substructure revealed planar arrays of dislocation dipoles rather than the cellular structures which appear both in single and polycrystals of cyclically deformed copper and silver. This more uniform distribution of dislocations allows a better identification of the SFT.The samples were fatigue deformed at the constant total strain amplitude Δε = 0.025 for 5 cycles at three temperatures: 85, 293 and 773 K. One of the samples was tensile strained with a total deformation of 3.5%.

A TEM microscopical investigation of the magnetic domain structure of a metastable austenitic stainless steel

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 696-697
Author(s):  
G. Fourlaris ◽  
T. Gladman
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Cold Rolling ◽  
Solution Treatment ◽  
Magnetic Domain ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Medium Carbon Steel ◽  
Magnetic Characteristics ◽  
Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel

Stainless steels have widespread applications due to their good corrosion resistance, but for certain types of large naval constructions, other requirements are imposed such as high strength and toughness , and modified magnetic characteristics.The magnetic characteristics of a 302 type metastable austenitic stainless steel has been assessed after various cold rolling treatments designed to increase strength by strain inducement of martensite. A grade 817M40 low alloy medium carbon steel was used as a reference material.The metastable austenitic stainless steel after solution treatment possesses a fully austenitic microstructure. However its tensile strength , in the solution treated condition , is low.Cold rolling results in the strain induced transformation to α’- martensite in austenitic matrix and enhances the tensile strength. However , α’-martensite is ferromagnetic , and its introduction to an otherwise fully paramagnetic matrix alters the magnetic response of the material. An example of the mixed martensitic-retained austenitic microstructure obtained after the cold rolling experiment is provided in the SEM micrograph of Figure 1.

Characterization of Hot-Steam Oxidation Tested Chromosiliconized Heat-Resistant Austenitic Stainless Steel

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1090-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Hoshiyama ◽  
Xiaoying Li ◽  
Hanshan Dong ◽  
Akio Nishimoto
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Steam Oxidation ◽  
Heat Resistant

Environmental cracking characteristics of deep-drawn austenitic stainless steel cases.

1990 ◽  
Vol 39 (439) ◽  
pp. 432-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu MITANI ◽  
Hisayoshi TAKAZAWA ◽  
Mitsumasa HISHIYAMA ◽  
Mikio NISHIHATA
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Cracking Characteristics

On Corrosion Resistance Of Austenitic Stainless Steel Clad Layer on a Low Alloy Steel

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Manas Kumar Saha ◽  
Ritesh Hazra ◽  
Ajit Mondal ◽  
Santanu Das
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Corrosion Resistance ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Alloy Steel ◽  
Low Alloy Steel ◽  
Clad Layer

Estimation of Some Mechanical Properties for Similar & Dissimilar Welded Joints

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-76
Author(s):  
Abdullah Daie'e Assi
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Base Metal ◽  
Welded Joints ◽  
Plate Thickness ◽  
Low Carbon Steel ◽  
Dissimilar Metals ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Steel Type

This research deals with the choice of the suitable filler metal to weld the similar and dissimilar metals (Low carbon steel type A516 & Austenitic stainless steel type 316L) under constant conditions such as, plate thickness (6 mm), voltage (78 v), current (120 A), straight polarity. This research deals with three major parts. The first parts Four types of electrodes were used for welding of dissimilar metals (C.St A516 And St.St 316L) two from mild steel (E7018, E6013) and other two from austenitic stainless steel (E309L, E308L) various inspection were carried out include (Visual T., X-ray T., δ- Ferrite phase T., and Microstructures T.) and mechanical testing include (tensile T., bending T. and micro hardness T.) The second parts done by used the same parameters to welding similar metals from (C.St A516) Or (St.St 316L). The third parts deals with welding of dissimilar weldments (C.St And St.St) by two processes, gas tungsten are welding (GTAW) and shielded metal are welding (SMAW).        The results indicated that the spread of carbon from low carbon steel to the welding zone in the case of welding stainless steel elect pole (E309L) led to Configuration Carbides and then high hardness the link to high values ​​compared with the base metal. In most similar weldments showed hardness of the welding area is  higher than the hardness of the base metal. The electrode (E309L) is the most suitable to welding dissimilar metals from (C.St A516 With St.St 316L). The results also showed that the method of welding (GTAW) were better than the method of welding (SMAW) in dissimilar welded joints (St.St 316L with C.St A516) in terms of irregular shape and integrity of the welding defects, as well as characterized this weldments the high-lift and resistance ductility good when using the welding conditions are similar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document