Test Method for Conducting Transverse and Concentrated Load Tests on Panels used in Floor and Roof Construction

The uniform rigidity ring model is commonly used to design the segmented structures of shield tunnels. However, model tests have been primarily used to study the transverse effective rigidity ratio η with a concentrated force, which is notably different from realistic loading patterns. To obtain more reasonable η values, in this study, tests were performed with a concentrated load on an experimental bench and with a realistic loading pattern in sandy soil in a rigid steel tank. Three types of segmental ring models were designed and tested: straight-jointed, stagger-jointed, and uniform rings. The test results indicated that the η values of the stagger-jointed assembly mode were clearly larger than those of the straight-jointed assembly mode under both loading patterns. η increased as the load increased under the realistic loading conditions, whereas η decreased as the load increased under the concentrated load. More importantly, the η values derived from the realistic load tests were considerably larger than those derived from the concentrated load tests for both assembly modes (i.e., 0.423–0.672 and 0.587–0.761 for the straight-jointed and stagger-jointed assembly modes, respectively), and the former should be recommended for practical engineering applications. Furthermore, formulas relating η to the ratio of the cover depth to the tunnel diameter were proposed for sandy soil.

Download Full-text

Study on Prediction Deflection of at the Girder Midspan of Large Tonnage Gantry Crane Rigid Legs

Applied Mechanics and Materials ◽

10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.628.214 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 628 ◽

pp. 214-218

Author(s):

Da Peng Zhang ◽

Wen Ming Cheng ◽

Kun Cai

Keyword(s):

Bending Moment ◽

Moment Of Inertia ◽

Load Test ◽

Test Method ◽

Gantry Crane ◽

Deflection Curve ◽

Concentrated Load ◽

Small Load ◽

Curve Equation

It is the most important inspection index of the deflection value for the girder of gantry crane under rated load in the overall test. In the overall test for large tonnage gantry crane which prepared for experimental weight is very difficult at the site, or even impossible perform test. In the text, it is deduced the girder deflection curve equation where considering the effects of the leg bending moment to the girder deflection When the concentrated load is applied to the position of L/2,L/3 and 2L/3 of the girder. The girder deflection value can be obtained under small load at the position of L/2,L/3 and 2L/3 of the girder and the actual moment of inertia of the girder and two side leg can be obtained. In this way, the deflection of the large tonnage gantry crane are predicted through the data of the three-position method in the small load test. Three-position small load test method provides a practical and effective method for the prediction of the girder deflection of large tonnage gantry structure.

Download Full-text

Effect of Strand Indentation Types on the Development Length and Flexural Capacity of Concrete Railroad Ties Made With Different Prestressing Strands

2019 Joint Rail Conference ◽

10.1115/jrc2019-1233 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Amir Farid Momeni ◽

Robert J. Peterman ◽

B. Terry Beck ◽

Chih-Hang John Wu

Keyword(s):

The Other ◽

Development Length ◽

Concrete Compressive Strength ◽

Concentrated Load ◽

Bonding Performance ◽

Pretensioned Concrete ◽

Load Tests ◽

Prestressing Strands ◽

Wire Strand ◽

Prestressing Strand

Pretensioned concrete prisms made with five different prestressing strand types (four 7-wire strands and one 3-wire strand) were load tested to failure to understand the effect of strand indentation types on the development length and bonding performance of these different reinforcements. The prestressing strands were denoted SA, SB, SD, SE and SF. SA was a smooth strand while the other four were indented strands. All strands utilized in manufacturing ofprisms had diameter of 3/8″ (9.52 mm). Among all types of strands, SF was the only 3-wire strand and the remaining strands were all 7-wire strands. For all types of strands, four straight strands were embedded into each concrete prism, which had a 5.5″ (139.7 mm) × 5.5″ (139.7 mm) square cross section. The strands were tensioned to 75 percent of ultimate tensile strength of strands and gradually de-tensioned when the concrete compressive strength reached 4500 psi (31.03 Mpa). A consistent concrete mixture with type III cement, water-cement ratio of 0.32 and a 6-in. slump was used for all prisms. Prisms were load tested in 3-point-bending at different embedment lengths to obtain estimations of the development length of each type of strand. Two out of three identical 69-in.-long (175.26 cm) prisms were load tested at one end and one was tested at both ends for each reinforcement type evaluated. First prisms were tested at 28-in. (71.12 cm) from the end, while second prisms were tested at 20-in. (33.02 cm) from the end. Third prisms were loaded at 16.5-in. (41.9 cm) from one end and 13-in. (33.02 cm) from the other end. Thus, a total of 20 load tests (5 strand types × 4 tests each) were conducted in this study. During each test, a concentrated load with the rate of 900 lb/min (4003 N/min) was applied at mid-span until failure occurred. Values of load, mid-span deflection, and strand endslip were continuously monitored and recorded during each test. Plots of load-vs-deflection were then compared for prisms with each strand type and span, and the maximum sustained moment was also calculated for each test. The load tests revealed that there is a large difference in the development length of the strands based on their indentation type.

Download Full-text