Lithium silicate ceramic surface properties after surface treatment Właściwości ceramiki litowo-silikatowej po obróbce jej powierzchni

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-149
Author(s):  
Barbara Łapińska
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Lithium Silicate ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Silicate Ceramic

scholarly journals Influence of Low-Pressure Plasma on the Surface Properties of CAD-CAM Leucite-Reinforced Feldspar and Resin Matrix Ceramics

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 8856
Author(s):  
Pablo Sevilla ◽  
Carlos Lopez-Suarez ◽  
Jesús Pelaez ◽  
Celia Tobar ◽  
Veronica Rodriguez-Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Plasma Treatment ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Ceramic Materials ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Resin Matrix ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Plasma Treatments ◽  
Low Pressure Plasma

The introduction of new ceramic materials for dental restorations is currently a reality; however, little information is available on their surface treatment for the bonding process. Furthermore, surface treatment with plasma on ceramic materials has been recently introduced, although not many studies are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface properties of a leucite-reinforced feldspar ceramic (LIC) and resin matrix ceramic (RMC) after low-pressure plasma treatment. From each material, 48 discs were prepared and subject to surface treatment. The LIC group was treated by hydrofluoric acid (HF) (LIC-HF), plasma with oxygen (LIC-O2), and plasma with argon (LIC-Ar). The RMC group was treated by sandblasting with alumina (RMC-SB), plasma with oxygen (RMC-O2), and plasma with argon (RMC-Ar). The groups whose surfaces were not subjected to treatment were considered as the control group. Surface wettability and roughness was analyzed. The results showed significant differences among the treatments for both ceramics regarding wettability and roughness. Plasma treatments increased the wettability and had a very low effect on the roughness. Plasma treatments achieved similar values for both surface properties in each ceramic group with no differences between both treatments. Plasma treatment seems to be a promising alternative for ceramic surface treatments since it increased the surface energy of the ceramics analyzed and hardly affects the roughness. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of plasma treatment on the bond strength of ceramics.

Comparison of Bond Strength of Monolithic CAD-CAM Materials to Resin Cement Using Different Surface Treatment Methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Sevki Cinar ◽  
Bike Altan ◽  
Gokhan Akgungor
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Lithium Silicate ◽  
Treatment Methods ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Hybrid Ceramic ◽  
Silicate Ceramic

Objective: To compare the bond strength of monolithic CAD-CAM materials to resin cement using different surface treatment methods. Materials and Methods: Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e-max CAD), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (Vita Suprinity), resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate), and hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic) were used. Five groups of CAD-CAM blocks were treated as follows: control (C), HF etching (HF), HF etching + silanization (HF + S), sandblasting (SB), and sandblasting + silanization (SB + S). After surface treatments, SEM analyses were conducted. Specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Theracem) and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured, and failure types were categorized. Results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between SBS values obtained for different surface treatments and CAD-CAM block types ( P < .001). Among the CAD-CAM materials, the highest SBS was reported in the HF + S group for Vita Enamic. Although IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity, and Vita Enamic showed higher bond strength when treated with HF + S, Lava Ultimate has the highest bond strength value when treated with SB + S. Conclusions: The bond strength of CAD-CAM materials was influenced by surface treatment. Additionally, silanization significantly improved the bond strength of all materials except Lava Ultimate.

Fatigue Behavior of Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Restorations: Effects of Conditionings of the Intaglio Surface and the Resin Cements

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Dalla-Nora ◽  
LF Guilardi ◽  
CP Zucuni ◽  
LF Valandro ◽  
MP Rippe
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Testing ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Lithium Silicate ◽  
Dihydrogen Phosphate ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Silicate Ceramic ◽  
O 10

SUMMARY Objective: This study assessed the effect of conditioning of the intaglio surface and resin cements on the fatigue behavior of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS) restorations cemented to a dentin analogue. Methods: ZLS ceramic (Ø=10 mm, thickness=1.5 mm) and dentin analogue (Ø=10 mm, thickness=2.0 mm) discs were produced and allocated according to the study factors, totaling nine study groups: ceramic surface treatment (three levels: hydrofluoric acid etching [HF]; self-etching ceramic primer [EP]; tribochemical silica coating [TBS]) and resin cement (three levels: 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate [nMDP]; MDP–containing conventional resin cement [MDP]; self-adhesive resin cement [SA]). The ceramic bonding surfaces were treated and cemented on the dentin analogue, and all the specimens were aged for 5000 thermal cycles (5°C–55°C) prior to fatigue testing. The stepwise fatigue test (20 Hz frequency) started with a load of 400 N (5000 cycles) followed by steps of 500, 600, and up to 1800 N (step-size: 100 N) at a maximum of 10,000 cycles each step. The specimens were loaded until failure (crack), which was detected by light transillumination and visual inspection at the end of each step. The fatigue failure load and number of cycles for failure data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier (log-rank test; α=0.05). Topographic and fractographic analyses were also performed. Results: HF- (973.33–1206.67 N) and EP- (866.67–1066.67 N) treated specimens failed at statistically similar loads and higher than TBS (546.67–733.33 N), regardless of the cement used. All the fractographical inspections demonstrated failure as radial crack. Conclusion: The HF and EP treatments promoted better mechanical fatigue behavior of the ceramic restoration, while tribochemical silica coating induced worse fatigue results and should be avoided for treating the ZLS surface prior to bonding.

scholarly journals Effects of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and a New Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
TP Sato ◽  
LC Anami ◽  
RM Melo ◽  
LF Valandro ◽  
MA Bottino
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Lithium Silicate ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Silicate Ceramic

SUMMARY This study evaluated the effects of surface treatments on the bond strength between the new zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS) and resin cement. VITA Suprinity blocks were crystallized according to the manufacturer's instructions and randomly assigned to six groups (N=36; n=6), according to the surface treatment to be performed and aging conditions: HF20, 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds, baseline (control); HF20tc, 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds, aging; HF40, 10% hydrofluoric acid for 40 seconds, baseline; HF40tc, 10% hydrofluoric acid for 40 seconds, aging; CJ, CoJet sandblasting (25 seconds, 2.5 bar, 15-mm distance), baseline; and CJtc, CoJet sandblasting (25 seconds, 2.5 bar, 15-mm distance), aging. All specimens were silanized (Monobond S) and cemented with Panavia F to newly polymerized Z250 resin blocks. After specimens were immersed for 24 hours in distilled water at 37° C, 1-mm2 cross-section microbars were obtained by means of a cutting machine under constant cooling. Baseline groups were immediately tested, whereas “tc” groups were used to analyze the effect of aging on bond strength (10,000 thermal cycles, 5/55°C, 30-second bath). The microtensile bond strength test was performed with a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min), and bond strength (MPa) was calculated when the load-to-failure (N) was divided by the adhesive area (mm2). We also evaluated the surface roughness (Sa, average roughness; Str, texture aspect ratio; Sdr, developed interfacial area ratio) and the contact angle resulting from the treatments. Data were statistically analyzed by one- or two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (all α=5%). The failure mode of each specimen was evaluated by stereomicroscopy, and representative specimens were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. The microtensile bond strength was affected by the surface conditioning (p&lt;0.0001), storage condition (p&lt;0.0001), and the interaction between them (p=0.0012). The adhesion for HF etching was stable, whereas for CJ, aging significantly damaged the adhesion. Most failures were predominantly adhesive between ceramic and cement (52.6%). The roughness of the treated samples was higher compared with that of polished specimens for the three evaluated parameters (Sa, Str, and Sdr; all p&lt;0.0001). Contact angle was also influenced by treatments (p&lt;0.0001), with the CJ group showing values similar to those of control specimens. It can be concluded that the three surface treatment techniques present favorable immediate results, but silica coating was not effective in maintaining the bond strength over the long term.

In vitro wear of a zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic against different restorative materials

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 103403
Author(s):  
Larissa Marcia Martins Alves ◽  
Lisseth Patricia Claudio Contreras ◽  
Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos ◽  
Marco Antonio Bottino ◽  
Luiz Felipe Valandro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Silicate ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Silicate Ceramic

scholarly journals Acid Etching as Surface Treatment Method for Luting of Glass-Ceramic Restorations, part 1: Acids, Application Protocol and Etching Effectiveness

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 568-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilija Barjaktarova-Valjakova ◽  
Anita Grozdanov ◽  
Ljuben Guguvcevski ◽  
Vesna Korunoska-Stevkovska ◽  
Biljana Kapusevska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Etching Time ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Etching Effect

AIM: The purpose of this review is to represent acids that can be used as surface etchant before adhesive luting of ceramic restorations, placement of orthodontic brackets or repair of chipped porcelain restorations. Chemical reactions, application protocol, and etching effect are presented as well.STUDY SELECTION: Available scientific articles published in PubMed and Scopus literature databases, scientific reports and manufacturers' instructions and product information from internet websites, written in English, using following search terms: “acid etching, ceramic surface treatment, hydrofluoric acid, acidulated phosphate fluoride, ammonium hydrogen bifluoride”, have been reviewed.RESULTS: There are several acids with fluoride ion in their composition that can be used as ceramic surface etchants. The etching effect depends on the acid type and its concentration, etching time, as well as ceramic type. The most effective etching pattern is achieved when using hydrofluoric acid; the numerous micropores and channels of different sizes, honeycomb-like appearance, extruded crystals or scattered irregular ceramic particles, depending on the ceramic type, have been detected on the etched surfaces.CONCLUSION: Acid etching of the bonding surface of glass - ceramic restorations is considered as the most effective treatment method that provides a reliable bond with composite cement. Selective removing of the glassy matrix of silicate ceramics results in a micromorphological three-dimensional porous surface that allows micromechanical interlocking of the luting composite.

Effect of electropulsing-ultrasonic surface treatment on the surface properties and the corrosion behavior of 45 steel

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (14) ◽  
pp. 2114-2124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Zhang ◽  
Haibo Wang ◽  
Shuo Zhang ◽  
Guolin Song ◽  
Song-Zhu Kure-Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Corrosion Behavior ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Ultrasonic Surface Treatment

Abstract

Application of Microbial Polyesters-Polyhydroxyalkanoates as Tissue Engineering Materials

2005 ◽  
Vol 288-289 ◽  
pp. 437-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo Qiang Chen ◽  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Ya Wu Wang ◽  
Zhong Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Material Surface ◽  
New Class ◽  
Molecular Studies ◽  
Cartilage Cells ◽  
Engineering Materials

Poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHHx) has improved mechanical properties over the existing PHA and our results have shown that PHBHHx has better biocompatibility over polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polylactic acid (PLA). Surface treatment with lipases dramatically changed the material surface properties and increased the biocompatibility of the PHBHHx. PHBHHx and its PHB blends had been used to make three dimensional structures and it has been found that cartilage, osteoblast, and fibroblasts all showed strong growth on the PHBHHx scaffolds. The growth was much better compared with PLA. The molecular studies also showed that mRNA encoding cartilages were strongly expressed when cartilage cells were grown on the PHBHHx. As PHBHHx has strong mechanical properties, easily processible and biodegradable, this material can be used to develop a new class of tissue engineering materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document