Comparison of the radiation conversion efficiency of flat plate and vacuum tube solar collectors

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-159
Author(s):  
Sławomir KURPASK
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ferrández ◽  
Carlos Moron ◽  
Jorge Pablo Díaz ◽  
Pablo Saiz

ResumenEl actual Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE) pone de manifiesto la necesidad de cubrir parte de la demanda energética requerida para el abastecimiento de agua caliente sanitaria y climatización de piscinas cubiertas mediante sistemas de aprovechamiento de la energía solar térmica. En este artículo se presenta una comparativa entre las dos principales tipologías de captadores solares térmicos que existen en el mercado: el captador de placa plana y el captador de tubo de vacío, atendiendo a criterios de fracción solar, diseño e integración arquitectónica. Todo ello a fin de discernir en qué circunstancias es más favorable el uso de uno u otro sistema, comparando los resultados obtenidos mediante programas de simulación con la toma de medidas in situ.AbstractThe current Technical Building Code (CTE) highlights the need to cover part of the energy demand required for the supply of hot water and heating of indoor swimming pools using solar thermal systems. This article presents a comparison between the two main types of solar thermal collectors that exist in the market: the flat plate solar collector and the vacuum tube solar collector, according to criteria of solar fraction, design and architectural integration. All of this in order to discern in what circumstances the use of one or the other system is more favourable, comparing the results obtained through simulation programs with the taking of measurements in situ.


Author(s):  
S Kurpaska ◽  
H Latała ◽  
M Malinowski ◽  
P Kiełbasa

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1715
Author(s):  
Minjung Lee ◽  
Yunchan Shin ◽  
Honghyun Cho

This study experimentally investigated the performance characteristics of water and MWCNT/Fe3O4 binary nanofluid as a working fluid in a flat plate and vacuum tube solar collectors. As a result, the highest efficiency was 80.3% when 0.005 vol.% MWCNT/0.01 vol.% Fe3O4 binary nanofluid was applied to the flat plate solar collector, which was a 17.6% increase in efficiency, compared to that when water was used. In the case of the vacuum tube solar collector, the highest efficiency was 79.8%, which was 24.9% higher than when water was applied. Besides, when the mass flux of MWCNT/Fe3O4 binary nanofluid was changed from 420 to 598 kg/s·m2, the maximum efficiencies of the flat plate and vacuum tube solar collectors were increased by 7.8% and 8.3%, respectively. When the MWCNT/Fe3O4 binary nanofluid was applied to the vacuum tube solar collector, the efficiency improvement was much more significant, and the high performance could be maintained for wide operating conditions, compared with the flat plate solar collector.


Author(s):  
Guilherme Antonio Bartmeyer ◽  
Victor Vaurek Dimbarre ◽  
Pedro Leineker Ochoski Machado ◽  
PAULO HENRIQUE DIAS DOS SANTOS ◽  
Thiago Antonini Alves

Solar Energy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Vestlund ◽  
Jan-Olof Dalenbäck ◽  
Mats Rönnelid

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 477-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Nájera-Trejo ◽  
Ignacio R. Martin-Domínguez ◽  
Jorge A. Escobedo-Bretado

Author(s):  
Emin Kulic ◽  
Sadjit Metovic ◽  
Haris Lulic ◽  
Muhamed Koric
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document