Spleno-renal anastomotic bypass revascularization for worsening renal failure and uncontrolled hypertension in bilateral calcific atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

Following the recent publications of the STAR-study, the ASTRAL trial, the HERCULES trial and the CORAL trial on renal revascularization versus medical therapy in the management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease, there has been a near paradigm shift implying the nonutility of revascularization as a useful and necessary therapeutic option. Our recent experience with a patient who underwent an anastomotic bypass revascularization for worsening renal failure and uncontrolled hypertension in bilateral calcific atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis in Burlington, VT rekindled this debate. We posit that in appropriately selected patients, patients with acutely worsening renal failure, uncontrolled hypertension and/or symptomatic pulmonary edema, there is indeed a place for revascularization therapy, especially in the light of improved and safer surgical and anesthesiology techniques. It must be correctly acknowledged that the above well popularized randomized trials recruited mostly patients with otherwise stable chronic kidney disease at the time of enrollment. Similarly, only 12% of the patients in both arms of the ASTRAL trial demonstrated rapidly worsening renal failure prior to enrollment