scholarly journals De novo minimal change disease after kidney transplantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Amirhesam Alirezaei ◽  
Elham Zare ◽  
Mahmoud Parvin ◽  
Fatemeh Nili ◽  
Mahmood Bakhtiyari
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 81-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Mochizuki ◽  
Takahisa Iwata ◽  
Masaharu Nishikido ◽  
Tadashi Uramatsu ◽  
Hideki Sakai ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. B49
Author(s):  
Nimrta Ghuman ◽  
Vedavati Patel ◽  
John de Palma ◽  
Arvind Datla ◽  
Swetha Nataraj ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. e11-e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarat Kuppachi ◽  
Manish Suneja ◽  
Zoe Stewart ◽  
Ramesh Nair ◽  
Christie P. Thomas

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
GS Markowitz ◽  
CL Stemmer ◽  
BP Croker ◽  
VD D'Agati

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
Ryan Kunjal ◽  
Rabie Adam-Eldien ◽  
Raafat Makary ◽  
Francois Jo-Hoy ◽  
Charles W. Heilig

We report the case of a 22-year-old African American female who presented to another facility for routine follow-up in the 34th week of pregnancy with lower extremity swelling and nephrotic-range proteinuria. Although she was normotensive, it was initially thought that she had preeclampsia. She was monitored carefully and delivery was induced at 37 weeks of gestation. She was transferred to our hospital, where she was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on clinical and laboratory criteria. Renal biopsy revealed a surprising finding of minimal change disease (MCD) concomitant with class II lupus nephritis (LN). She was managed with pulses and then tapering doses of steroid therapy with dramatic resolution of the nephrotic syndrome. This case demonstrates not only the rare de novo occurrence of SLE in pregnancy, but the unique finding of MCD coexisting with class II LN. We propose that altered T cell activity may be the link between these seemingly distinct entities.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 418-421
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Sato ◽  
Yuna Asami ◽  
Reona Shiro ◽  
Masato Aoki ◽  
Miki Yasuda ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 350-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza A Zafarmand ◽  
Elzbieta Baranowska-Daca ◽  
Peter DC Ly ◽  
Chun C Tsao ◽  
Yeong-Jin Choi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 100952
Author(s):  
Joseph Cutrone ◽  
Deepak Mital ◽  
Chaitanya Desai ◽  
James Siegert

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Rhys Medjeral-Thomas ◽  
Christopher Lawrence ◽  
Marie Condon ◽  
Bhrigu Sood ◽  
Paul Warwicker ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesMinimal change disease is an important cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for minimal change disease, but a prolonged course of treatment is often required and relapse rates are high. Patients with minimal change disease are therefore often exposed to high cumulative corticosteroid doses and are at risk of associated adverse effects. This study investigated whether tacrolimus monotherapy without corticosteroids would be effective for the treatment of de novo minimal change disease.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsThis was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial involving six nephrology units across the United Kingdom. Adult patients with first presentation of minimal change disease and nephrotic syndrome were randomized to treatment with either oral tacrolimus at 0.05 mg/kg twice daily, or prednisolone at 1 mg/kg daily up to 60 mg daily. The primary outcome was complete remission of nephrotic syndrome after 8 weeks of therapy. Secondary outcomes included remission of nephrotic syndrome at 16 and 26 weeks, rates of relapse of nephrotic syndrome, and changes from baseline kidney function.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the tacrolimus and prednisolone treatment cohorts in the proportion of patients in complete remission at 8 weeks (21 out of 25 [84%] for prednisolone and 17 out of 25 [68%] for tacrolimus cohorts; P=0.32; difference in remission rates was 16%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], −11% to 40%), 16 weeks (23 out of 25 [92%] for prednisolone and 19 out of 25 [76%] for tacrolimus cohorts; P=0.25; difference in remission rates was 16%; 95% CI, −8% to 38%), or 26 weeks (23 out of 25 [92%] for prednisolone and 22 out of 25 [88%] for tacrolimus cohorts; P=0.99; difference in remission rates was 4%; 95% CI, −17% to 25%). There was no significant difference in relapse rates (17 out of 23 [74%] for prednisolone and 16 out of 22 [73%] for tacrolimus cohorts) for patients in each group who achieved complete remission (P=0.99) or in the time from complete remission to relapse.ConclusionsTacrolimus monotherapy can be effective alternative treatment for patients wishing to avoid steroid therapy for minimal change disease.PodcastThis article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_01_16_CJN06180519.mp3


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document