Monotonicity results for delta fractional differences revisited

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Erbe ◽  
Christopher S. Goodrich ◽  
Baoguo Jia ◽  
Allan Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Recent Result ◽  
Fractional Difference ◽  
Monotonicity Results

AbstractIn this paper, by means of a recently obtained inequality, we study the delta fractional difference, and we obtain the following interrelated theorems, which improve recent results in the literature.Theorem A: ℕTheorem B: ℕTheorem C: ℕIn addition, we obtain the following result, which extends a recent result due to Atici and Uyanik.Theorem D: ℕ

Monotonicity results for CFC nabla fractional differences with negative lower bound

Analysis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Goodrich ◽  
Jagan M. Jonnalagadda
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Fractional Order ◽  
Fractional Difference ◽  
Integer Order ◽  
Monotonicity Results

Abstract We consider the sequential CFC-type nabla fractional difference ( CFC ∇ a + 1 ν ∇ a μ CFC u ) ( t ) {(^{\mathrm{CFC}}\nabla^{\nu}_{a+1}{}^{\mathrm{CFC}}\nabla^{\mu}_{a}u)(t)} and show that one can derive monotonicity-type results even in the case where this difference satisfies a strictly negative lower bound. This illustrates some dissimilarities between the integer-order and fractional-order cases.

Positivity and monotonicity results for triple sequential fractional differences via convolution

Analysis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-103
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Goodrich ◽  
Benjamin Lyons
Keyword(s):  
Convolution Operator ◽  
Fractional Difference ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Monotonicity Results

AbstractWe investigate the relationship between the discrete fractional difference(\Delta^{\gamma}\circ\Delta^{\beta}\circ\Delta^{\alpha}f)(t)and the positivity or monotonicity of the function f. Our approach relies on interpreting the fractional difference as an appropriate convolution operator. The results we provide demonstrate that when compared to the double sequential case, i.e., {(\Delta^{\beta}\circ\Delta^{\alpha}f)(t)}, there is relatively more complexity observed.

scholarly journals On Discrete Delta Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Operators and Monotonicity Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed ◽  
Thabet Abdeljawad ◽  
Faraidun Kadir Hamasalh
Keyword(s):  
Fractional Calculus ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Mean Value Theorem ◽  
Fractional Operators ◽  
Discrete Fractional Calculus ◽  
Laplace Transform Method ◽  
Fractional Difference ◽  
Transform Method ◽  
Monotonicity Analysis ◽  
Monotonicity Results

The discrete delta Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differences and sums are proposed to distinguish their monotonicity analysis from the sense of Riemann and Caputo operators on the time scale Z. Moreover, the action of Q− operator and discrete delta Laplace transform method are also reported. Furthermore, a relationship between the discrete delta Caputo-Fabrizio-Caputo and Caputo-Fabrizio-Riemann fractional differences is also studied in detail. To better understand the dynamic behavior of the obtained monotonicity results, the fractional difference mean value theorem is derived. The idea used in this article is readily applicable to obtain monotonicity analysis of other discrete fractional operators in discrete fractional calculus.

scholarly journals Monotonicity results for delta and nabla caputo and Riemann fractional differences via dual identities

Filomat ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 3671-3683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thabet Abdeljawad ◽  
Bahaaeldin Abdalla
Keyword(s):  
Difference Operators ◽  
Fractional Difference ◽  
Monotonicity Properties ◽  
Delta Type ◽  
Dual Identities ◽  
The Right ◽  
Monotonicity Results

Recently, some authors have proved monotonicity results for delta and nabla fractional differences separately. In this article, we use dual identities relating delta and nabla fractional difference operators to prove shortly the monotonicity properties for the (left Riemann) nabla fractional differences using the corresponding delta type properties. Also, we proved some monotonicity properties for the Caputo fractional differences. Finally, we use the Q??operator dual identities to prove monotonicity results for the right fractional difference operators.

scholarly journals Oscillatory behavior of nonlinear Hilfer fractional difference equations

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuğba Yalçın Uzun
Keyword(s):  
Difference Equations ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Oscillatory Behavior ◽  
Fractional Difference ◽  
Fractional Difference Equations ◽  
All Solutions ◽  
Alpha Beta

AbstractIn this paper, we study the oscillation behavior for higher order nonlinear Hilfer fractional difference equations of the type $$\begin{aligned}& \Delta _{a}^{\alpha ,\beta }y(x)+f_{1} \bigl(x,y(x+\alpha ) \bigr) =\omega (x)+f_{2} \bigl(x,y(x+ \alpha ) \bigr),\quad x\in \mathbb{N}_{a+n-\alpha }, \\& \Delta _{a}^{k-(n-\gamma )}y(x) \big|_{x=a+n-\gamma } = y_{k}, \quad k= 0,1,\ldots,n, \end{aligned}$$ Δ a α , β y ( x ) + f 1 ( x , y ( x + α ) ) = ω ( x ) + f 2 ( x , y ( x + α ) ) , x ∈ N a + n − α , Δ a k − ( n − γ ) y ( x ) | x = a + n − γ = y k , k = 0 , 1 , … , n , where $\lceil \alpha \rceil =n$ ⌈ α ⌉ = n , $n\in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ n ∈ N 0 and $0\leq \beta \leq 1$ 0 ≤ β ≤ 1 . We introduce some sufficient conditions for all solutions and give an illustrative example for our results.

scholarly journals On Riemann—Liouville and Caputo Fractional Forward Difference Monotonicity Analysis

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1303
Author(s):  
Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed ◽  
Thabet Abdeljawad ◽  
Faraidun Kadir Hamasalh
Keyword(s):  
Time Scale ◽  
Initial Value Problems ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Mean Value Theorem ◽  
Discrete Fractional Calculus ◽  
Initial Value ◽  
Forward Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Monotonicity Analysis ◽  
Monotonicity Results

Monotonicity analysis of delta fractional sums and differences of order υ∈(0,1] on the time scale hZ are presented in this study. For this analysis, two models of discrete fractional calculus, Riemann–Liouville and Caputo, are considered. There is a relationship between the delta Riemann–Liouville fractional h-difference and delta Caputo fractional h-differences, which we find in this study. Therefore, after we solve one, we can apply the same method to the other one due to their correlation. We show that y(z) is υ-increasing on Ma+υh,h, where the delta Riemann–Liouville fractional h-difference of order υ of a function y(z) starting at a+υh is greater or equal to zero, and then, we can show that y(z) is υ-increasing on Ma+υh,h, where the delta Caputo fractional h-difference of order υ of a function y(z) starting at a+υh is greater or equal to −1Γ(1−υ)(z−(a+υh))h(−υ)y(a+υh) for each z∈Ma+h,h. Conversely, if y(a+υh) is greater or equal to zero and y(z) is increasing on Ma+υh,h, we show that the delta Riemann–Liouville fractional h-difference of order υ of a function y(z) starting at a+υh is greater or equal to zero, and consequently, we can show that the delta Caputo fractional h-difference of order υ of a function y(z) starting at a+υh is greater or equal to −1Γ(1−υ)(z−(a+υh))h(−υ)y(a+υh) on Ma,h. Furthermore, we consider some related results for strictly increasing, decreasing, and strictly decreasing cases. Finally, the fractional forward difference initial value problems and their solutions are investigated to test the mean value theorem on the time scale hZ utilizing the monotonicity results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document