scholarly journals Computationally efficient time domain detection algorithm for characteristic points in non invasive continuous blood pressure measurements

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (SI-1 Track-F) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Lerch ◽  
R. Orglmeister
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Time Domain ◽  
Detection Algorithm ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Characteristic Points ◽  
Continuous Blood Pressure

scholarly journals Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurements in Cats: Clinical Significance of Hypertension Associated with Chronic Renal Failure.

1998 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 805-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika MISHINA ◽  
Toshifumi WATANABE ◽  
Kouichi FUJII ◽  
Hiroto MAEDA ◽  
Yoshito WAKAO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Chronic Renal Failure ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Invasive Blood Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Chung ◽  
Guo Chen ◽  
Brenton Alexander ◽  
Maxime Cannesson
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Continuous Blood Pressure

Adaptation to non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring

1984 ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Pessina ◽  
P. Palatini ◽  
G. Sperti ◽  
L. Cordone ◽  
E. Ventura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Continuous Blood Pressure

A comparison of CAT Doppler and oscillometric Memoprint machines for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanne E. Jepson ◽  
Vivien Hartley ◽  
Michael Mendl ◽  
Sarah ME Caney ◽  
David J Gould
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Measurement ◽  
Systemic Hypertension ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Measuring Devices ◽  
Oscillometric Device ◽  
Significant Difference

Indirect blood pressure measurements were compared in 28 conscious cats using Doppler and oscillometric blood pressure-measuring devices. Ten cats were used to compare Doppler measurements between two examiners and 18 cats were used to compare Doppler and oscillometric measurements. The Doppler machine obtained systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings in 100% and 51% of attempts, respectively. With the oscillometric machine, systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings were obtained in 52% of the attempts. With the Doppler, measures of mean systolic blood pressure between two examiners were positively correlated, but there was no correlation for diastolic blood pressure measures. When comparing the results obtained by Doppler and oscillometric machines there was no significant difference between mean systolic blood pressure readings, but the oscillometric machine produced significantly higher estimates of diastolic blood pressure. In both cases, the standard deviations for the oscillometric machine were considerably larger than those for the Doppler machine. The first reading of systolic blood pressure obtained with the Doppler machine was an excellent predictor of the mean of five readings, but this was not so for the oscillometric machine. It took less than 5 min to obtain five readings in 37.5% of cases with the Doppler machine but this was true for only 5% of cases with the oscillometric machine. Two cats with ophthalmological lesions consistent with systemic hypertension were identified. In these two patients, systolic blood pressure measurements were between 200 and 225 mmHg when measured by Doppler, and between 140 and 150 mmHg when measured by the oscillometric machine. This suggests that a lower reference range for normal systolic blood pressure values should be used for the oscillometric device.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document