How to find small non-coding RNAs in bacteria

2005 ◽  
Vol 386 (12) ◽  
pp. 1219-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Vogel ◽  
Cynthia Mira Sharma

AbstractSmall non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) have attracted considerable attention as an emerging class of gene expression regulators. In bacteria, a few regulatory RNA molecules have long been known, but the extent of their role in the cell was not fully appreciated until the recent discovery of hundreds of potential sRNA genes in the bacteriumEscherichia coli. Orthologs of theseE. colisRNA genes, as well as unrelated sRNAs, were also found in other bacteria. Here we review the disparate experimental approaches used over the years to identify sRNA molecules and their genes in prokaryotes. These include genome-wide searches based on the biocomputational prediction of non-coding RNA genes, global detection of non-coding transcripts using microarrays, and shotgun cloning of small RNAs (RNomics). Other sRNAs were found by either co-purification with RNA-binding proteins, such as Hfq or CsrA/RsmA, or classical cloning of abundant small RNAs after size fractionation in polyacrylamide gels. In addition, bacterial genetics offers powerful tools that aid in the search for sRNAs that may play a critical role in the regulatory circuit of interest, for example, the response to stress or the adaptation to a change in nutrient availability. Many of the techniques discussed here have also been successfully applied to the discovery of eukaryotic and archaeal sRNAs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10193
Author(s):  
Maliha Wajahat ◽  
Cameron Peter Bracken ◽  
Ayla Orang

The widespread implementation of mass sequencing has revealed a diverse landscape of small RNAs derived from larger precursors. Whilst many of these are likely to be byproducts of degradation, there are nevertheless metabolically stable fragments derived from tRNAs, rRNAs, snoRNAs, and other non-coding RNA, with a number of examples of the production of such fragments being conserved across species. Coupled with specific interactions to RNA-binding proteins and a growing number of experimentally reported examples suggesting function, a case is emerging whereby the biological significance of small non-coding RNAs extends far beyond miRNAs and piRNAs. Related to this, a similarly complex picture is emerging of non-canonical roles for the non-coding precursors, such as for snoRNAs that are also implicated in such areas as the silencing of gene expression and the regulation of alternative splicing. This is in addition to a body of literature describing snoRNAs as an additional source of miRNA-like regulators. This review seeks to highlight emerging roles for such non-coding RNA, focusing specifically on “new” roles for snoRNAs and the small fragments derived from them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3711
Author(s):  
Melina J. Sedano ◽  
Alana L. Harrison ◽  
Mina Zilaie ◽  
Chandrima Das ◽  
Ramesh Choudhari ◽  
...  

Genome-wide RNA sequencing has shown that only a small fraction of the human genome is transcribed into protein-coding mRNAs. While once thought to be “junk” DNA, recent findings indicate that the rest of the genome encodes many types of non-coding RNA molecules with a myriad of functions still being determined. Among the non-coding RNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) and enhancer RNAs (eRNA) are found to be most copious. While their exact biological functions and mechanisms of action are currently unknown, technologies such as next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and global nuclear run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) have begun deciphering their expression patterns and biological significance. In addition to their identification, it has been shown that the expression of long non-coding RNAs and enhancer RNAs can vary due to spatial, temporal, developmental, or hormonal variations. In this review, we explore newly reported information on estrogen-regulated eRNAs and lncRNAs and their associated biological functions to help outline their markedly prominent roles in estrogen-dependent signaling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Paola Briata ◽  
Roberto Gherzi

Although mammals possess roughly the same number of protein-coding genes as worms, it is evident that the non-coding transcriptome content has become far broader and more sophisticated during evolution. Indeed, the vital regulatory importance of both short and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has been demonstrated during the last two decades. RNA binding proteins (RBPs) represent approximately 7.5% of all proteins and regulate the fate and function of a huge number of transcripts thus contributing to ensure cellular homeostasis. Transcriptomic and proteomic studies revealed that RBP-based complexes often include lncRNAs. This review will describe examples of how lncRNA-RBP networks can virtually control all the post-transcriptional events in the cell.


2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo S. Bader ◽  
Ben R. Hawley ◽  
Ania Wilczynska ◽  
Martin Bushell

AbstractEffective DNA repair is essential for cell survival: a failure to correctly repair damage leads to the accumulation of mutations and is the driving force for carcinogenesis. Multiple pathways have evolved to protect against both intrinsic and extrinsic genotoxic events, and recent developments have highlighted an unforeseen critical role for RNA in ensuring genome stability. It is currently unclear exactly how RNA molecules participate in the repair pathways, although many models have been proposed and it is possible that RNA acts in diverse ways to facilitate DNA repair. A number of well-documented DNA repair factors have been described to have RNA-binding capacities and, moreover, screens investigating DNA-damage repair mechanisms have identified RNA-binding proteins as a major group of novel factors involved in DNA repair. In this review, we integrate some of these datasets to identify commonalities that might highlight novel and interesting factors for future investigations. This emerging role for RNA opens up a new dimension in the field of DNA repair; we discuss its impact on our current understanding of DNA repair processes and consider how it might influence cancer progression.


RSC Advances ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (60) ◽  
pp. 34408-34417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Qi Li ◽  
Yu Lin Jia ◽  
Feng Quan Liu ◽  
Fang Quan Wang ◽  
Fang Jun Fan ◽  
...  

Plant long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is a type of newly emerging epigenetic regulator playing a critical role in plant growth, development, and biotic stress responses.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhensheng Wang ◽  
Hongchang Zhou ◽  
Chunyan Wei ◽  
Zhihua Wang ◽  
Xiao Hao ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundSmall non-coding RNAs play critical regulatory roles in post-transcription. However, their characteristics in Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), the causative agent of human sexually transmitted trichomoniasis, still remain to be unveiled. MethodsSmall RNA transcriptomes from Trichomonas trophozoites were deeply sequenced through Illumina NextSeq 500 system and comprehensively analyzed to identify Trichomonas miRNAs and tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs). The tsRNAs candidates were confirmed by stem-loop RT-PCR and motifs to guide the cleavage of tsRNAs were predicted by performing GLAM2 algorithm. ResultsThe miRNAs were found at extremely low abundance (0.0046%) in T. vaginalis. Three categories of endogenous Trichomonas tsRNAs were identified as 5'tritsRNAs, mid-tritsRNAs and 3'tritsRNAs, with 5'tritsRNAs dominating (67.63%) in tsRNAs. Interestingly, the cleavage site analysis verified both conventional classes of tRFs and tRNA-halves in tritsRNAs, indicating the expression of tRNA-halves in non-stress condition. A total of 25 tritsRNAs were experimentally confirmed, accounting for 78.1% of all tested candidates. Three motifs were predicted to guide the production of tritsRNAs. This proved the expression of tRFs and tRNA-halves in T. vaginalis transcriptome. ConclusionsThis is the first report of genome-wide investigation of small RNAs, particularly tsRNAs and miRNAs, from Trichomonas parasites. Our findings demonstrate the expression profile of tsRNAs in T. vaginalis, while miRNA was hardly discovered. These results might promote the further research to better understand the evolution of small non-coding RNA in T. vaginalis and their functions in pathogenesis of trichomoniasis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Ding ◽  
Ruihua Yin ◽  
Shuai Zhang ◽  
Qi Xiao ◽  
Hongqin Zhao ◽  
...  

Atherosclerosis is a complex disease closely related to the function of endothelial cells (ECs), monocytes/macrophages, and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Despite a good understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the underlying molecular mechanisms are still only poorly understood. Therefore, atherosclerosis continues to be an important clinical issue worthy of further research. Recent evidence has shown that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) can serve as important regulators of cellular function in atherosclerosis. Besides, several studies have shown that lncRNAs are partly dependent on the specific interaction with RBPs to exert their function. This review summarizes the important contributions of lncRNAs and RBPs in atherosclerosis and provides novel and comprehensible interaction models of lncRNAs and RBPs.


2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 942
Author(s):  
Michele Spiniello ◽  
Mark Scalf ◽  
Amelia Casamassimi ◽  
Ciro Abbondanza ◽  
Lloyd M. Smith

RNA-binding proteins are crucial to the function of coding and non-coding RNAs. The disruption of RNA–protein interactions is involved in many different pathological states. Several computational and experimental strategies have been developed to identify protein binders of selected RNA molecules. Amongst these, ‘in cell’ hybridization methods represent the gold standard in the field because they are designed to reveal the proteins bound to specific RNAs in a cellular context. Here, we compare the technical features of different ‘in cell’ hybridization approaches with a focus on their advantages, limitations, and current and potential future applications.


Author(s):  
Ewa M Stein ◽  
Joanna Kwiatkowska ◽  
Maciej M Basczok ◽  
Chandra M Gravel ◽  
Katherine E Berry ◽  
...  

Abstract The regulation of gene expression by small RNAs in Escherichia coli depends on RNA binding proteins Hfq and ProQ, which bind mostly distinct RNA pools. To understand how ProQ discriminates between RNA substrates, we compared its binding to six different RNA molecules. Full-length ProQ bound all six RNAs similarly, while the isolated N-terminal FinO domain (NTD) of ProQ specifically recognized RNAs with Rho-independent terminators. Analysis of malM 3′-UTR mutants showed that tight RNA binding by the ProQ NTD required a terminator hairpin of at least 2 bp preceding an 3′ oligoU tail of at least four uridine residues. Substitution of an A-rich sequence on the 5′ side of the terminator to uridines strengthened the binding of several ProQ-specific RNAs to the Hfq protein, but not to the ProQ NTD. Substitution of the motif in the malM-3′ and cspE-3′ RNAs also conferred the ability to bind Hfq in E. coli cells, as measured using a three-hybrid assay. In summary, these data suggest that the ProQ NTD specifically recognizes 3′ intrinsic terminators of RNA substrates, and that the discrimination between RNA ligands by E. coli ProQ and Hfq depends both on positive determinants for binding to ProQ and negative determinants against binding to Hfq.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa M. Stein ◽  
Joanna Kwiatkowska ◽  
Maciej M. Basczok ◽  
Chandra M. Gravel ◽  
Katherine E. Berry ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe regulation of gene expression by small RNAs in Escherichia coli depends on RNA binding proteins Hfq and ProQ, which bind mostly distinct RNA pools. To understand how ProQ discriminates between RNA substrates, we compared its binding to six different RNA molecules. Full-length ProQ bound all six RNAs similarly, while the isolated N-terminal FinO domain (NTD) of ProQ specifically recognized RNAs with Rho-independent terminators. Analysis of malM 3’-UTR mutants showed that tight RNA binding by the ProQ NTD required a terminator hairpin of at least two base pairs preceding an 3’ oligoU tail of at least four uridine residues. Substitution of an A-rich sequence on the 5’ side of the terminator to uridines strengthened the binding of several ProQ-specific RNAs to the Hfq protein, but not to the ProQ NTD. Substitution of the motif in the malM-3’ and cspE-3’ RNAs also conferred the ability to bind Hfq in E. coli cells, as measured using a three-hybrid assay. In summary, these data suggest that the ProQ NTD specifically recognizes 3’ intrinsic terminators of RNA substrates, and that the discrimination between RNA ligands by E. coli ProQ and Hfq depends both on positive determinants for binding to ProQ and negative determinants against binding to Hfq.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document