Public subsidies and firm innovation, a mediating role of external collaboration: the relation between diverse natures of innovation activities

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
an Kim ◽  
Sang Ok Choi ◽  
Sooyeon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
Public Subsidies ◽  
External Collaboration

Information Technology Capability, Knowledge Assets and Firm Innovation

2013 ◽  
pp. 169-188
Author(s):  
Avimanyu Datta
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Networks ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Knowledge Assets ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
It Capability ◽  
Information Technology Capability

In this paper, the author presents a theoretical framework that establishes an indirect link between IT capabilities and firm innovation by characterizing the mediating role of knowledge assets: knowledge networks and knowledge capabilities. Firm innovation itself is characterized as innovation development and innovation commercialization. The search on literature of IT capability and innovation revealed a very lukewarm recognition towards firm level variables in knowledge networks, knowledge capabilities, and distinction between innovation development and commercialization. Backed up by detailed reviews of literature on innovation, strategy, and entrepreneurship, the author posits propositions linking the aforementioned constructs, and proposes a framework for future research linking IT Capability with Firm Innovation.

Information Technology Capability, Knowledge Assets and Firm Innovation

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avimanyu Datta
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Networks ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Innovation Development ◽  
Knowledge Assets ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
It Capability ◽  
Information Technology Capability

In this paper, the author presents a theoretical framework that establishes an indirect link between IT capabilities and firm innovation by characterizing the mediating role of knowledge assets: knowledge networks and knowledge capabilities. Firm innovation itself is characterized as innovation development and innovation commercialization. The search on literature of IT capability and innovation revealed a very lukewarm recognition towards firm level variables in knowledge networks, knowledge capabilities, and distinction between innovation development and commercialization. Backed up by detailed reviews of literature on innovation, strategy, and entrepreneurship, the author posits propositions linking the aforementioned constructs, and proposes a framework for future research linking IT Capability with Firm Innovation.

Ownership Change and Firm Innovation: The Mediating Role of Interest Alignment

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlong He ◽  
Zi-Lin He ◽  
Tony W. Tong
Keyword(s):  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Interest Alignment

Impact of Team Leadership Habitual Domains on Ambidextrous Innovation

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 1955-1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinwei Ye ◽  
Junwen Feng ◽  
Lei Ma ◽  
Xiaojing Huang
Keyword(s):  
Structural Equation ◽  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Team Leadership ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Team Leaders ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Exploratory Innovation

We studied the formation of leaders' habitual behaviors and the impact of leaders' existing and potential capabilities on ambidextrous (i.e., exploitative and exploratory) innovation activities. Leadership habitual domain (LHD) theory was applied from an endogenous perspective to analyze the impact mechanism of LHD on ambidextrous innovation via the mediating role of dynamic capabilities. We used structural equation modeling to test data collected from 205 team leaders in East China. Results showed that LHD was positively associated with both exploitative and exploratory innovation, and that dynamic capabilities mediated these relationships. Thus, team leaders should renew, reconfigure, and expand their LHD by sensing and seizing opportunities when implementing ambidextrous innovation.

scholarly journals A Dynamic Capabilities-Based Research Model for Innovation in Independent Restaurants

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Belinda K. Muriuki ◽  
Zack B. Awino ◽  
Madara M. Ogot ◽  
James N. Muranga
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Restaurant Industry ◽  
Research Model ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Comprehensive Framework ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the study is to contribute to the existing literature by reviewing empirical studies conducted in the restaurant industry on innovation to develop a dynamic capabilities-based research model for independent restaurants which can be tested by future scholars in the restaurants industry. The review covered innovation models that have been used and tested in restaurants; types of innovation; dynamic capabilities as an antecedent for innovation; the mediating role of human capital between dynamic capabilities and innovation; and the relationship between innovation and performance. The results of the study revealed that innovation activities described in the literature can be categorised into the dynamic capabilities components of sensing, learning, integrating, and co-ordinating capabilities thus supporting the proposed dynamic capabilities research model. The model, therefore, provides a comprehensive framework for investigating innovation activities in independent restaurants.

scholarly journals The role of collaboration and external knowledge for innovation in small food firms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Wixe ◽  
Pia Nilsson ◽  
Lucia Naldi ◽  
Hans Westlund
Keyword(s):  
Product Innovation ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Distribution Channels ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
Logit Estimation ◽  
Broad Classification

AbstractIn this study, we use unique purpose-built survey data to show that small food firms are more innovative when externally engaged. To capture this, we apply a broad classification of innovative activities, including new products, processes, markets, organization, and distribution channels, and examine them against types of external interactions. The analysis, an ordered logit estimation, controls for heterogeneity across firms as well as geographic conditions. The results demonstrate a positive relationship between external interaction and firm innovation, though there are differences across types of external engagement and innovation activities. Product innovation benefits from knowledge from extra-regional firms, while several of the other forms of innovation show a positive relationship with support from regional and municipality boards. Additionally, firm collaboration regarding transports and sales enhances most types of innovation, but there are few relationships of benefit with research-intensive organizations. We conclude that, to be effective, innovation strategies of both the firms themselves and policymakers need to consider local context, access to intra- and extra-regional knowledge sources, and what types of innovation activities the firms are engaged in.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document