scholarly journals On the simple and the complex in psychiatry, with reference to DSM 5 and Research Domain Criteria

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridha Joober
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  

A crisis of confidence was triggered by the disappointment that diagnostic validity, an important goal, was not achieved with the publication of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project, which provides a framework for neuroscientific research, was initially conceptualized as an alternative to DSM. However, RDoC and DSM are complementary rather than mutually exclusive. From a historical perspective, this article argues that the debate opposing psychology and brain in psychiatric classification is not new and has an air of déjà vu. We go back to the first classifications based on a scientific taxonomy in the late 18th century with Boissier de Sauvages, which were supposed to describe diseases as they really existed in nature. Emil Kraepelin successfully associated psychopathology and brain research, prefiguring the interaction between DSM and RDoC. DSM symptoms remain valuable because they are the only data that are immediately and directly observable. Computational science is a promising instrument to interconnect psychopathological and neuroscientific data in the future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-420 ◽  

Clinical psychopathology has largely ignored the developments in the field of social neuroscience. The so-called moral emotions are a group of affective experiences thought to promote cooperation, group cohesion, and reorganization. In this review, we: (i) briefly describe a provisional taxonomy of a limited set of moral emotions and their neural underpinnings; and (ii) discuss how disgust, guilt, anger/indignation, and shame/embarrassment can be conceptualized as key affective experiences in different neuropsychiatric disorders. Based on a concise review of the literature linking moral emotions, psychopathology, and neuropsychiatry, we have devised a simple and preliminary scheme where we conjecture how specific moral emotions can be implicated in some categories of DSM-5 diagnoses, potentially helping to bridge psychopathology and neurobiologically plausible variables, in line with the Research Domain Criteria initiative. We hope this stimulates new empirical work exploring how moral emotional changes and their underlying neurobiology can help elucidating the neural underpinnings of mental disorders.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Janaína Bandeira ◽  
Eugênio De Moura Campos

Introdução: com o avanço das pesquisas em neurobiologia e a necessidade de optimização dos critérios diagnósticos, a 5ª edição do Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais (DSM-5) realizou importantes mudanças no modo de classificar, catalogar e diagnosticar as doenças mentais. Material e métodos: empreendemos pesquisa de artigos na Pubmed com análises sob diferentes perspectivas com o propósito de obter uma ampla visão das limitações e conquistas com sua publicação. Desenvolvimento: a nova edição do manual efetuou inúmeras alterações em relação à anterior, como a mudança do sistema de classificação multiaxial para dimensional, a fim de melhor abordar os sintomas como um continuum de intensidade, e a elaboração de critérios com maior especificidade para reduzir os diagnósticos “sem outra especificação”. Por fim, citamos o projeto Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC), ressaltando o contexto e os motivos de sua criação em torno do DSM-5. Conclusão: a atualização conseguiu apenas parcialmente seu objetivo de adotar amplamente o sistema dimensional e não obteve sucesso em incluir critérios genéticos ou neurobiológicos. Contudo, sua possibilidade de contínua revisão possibilita que seja renovada de acordo com as descobertas relevantes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Lozano-Vargas

El trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo (TOC) es una condición clínica heterogénea que presenta una prevalencia del 2% y causa una gran disfuncionalidad. Se han descrito cuatro dimensiones clínicas en esta entidad: simetría/orden, contaminación/lavado, acumulación y sexual/religiosa/agresión. Presenta una amplia comorbilidad y  existe evidencia de diferencias neurobiológicas entre el TOC y los trastornos de ansiedad. El DSM-5 y la CIE-11 reconocen que la psicopatología nuclear en el TOC y trastornos relacionados es la compulsión y no la ansiedad. Se discute la posibilidad de añadir otros especificadores clínicos y se formula la esperanza de que sistemas como el Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), estudios dimensionales y la integración de diversas áreas de investigaciónmarquen un futuro promisorio para estos y otros trastornos psiquiátricos.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogério da Silva Paes Henriques

Resumo Apresenta-se o “nominalismo dinâmico” de Hacking, aplicado à classificação psiquiátrica, como exemplo ilustrativo de síntese entre realismo e nominalismo. Expõem-se as perspectivas realistas inscritas tanto moderadamente na proposta híbrida do Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), quanto fortemente na proposta naturalista de seus concorrentes: Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) e Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). Aponta-se o principal efeito do naturalismo aplicado à classificação psiquiátrica, que consiste no abandono do hibridismo entre realismo e nominalismo, em prol de uma cartografia do mental que, com recurso à matemática, reivindica-se estritamente realista, respondendo a demanda por maior precisão da bipsiquiatria.


Author(s):  
James J. Strain ◽  
Patricia Casey ◽  
Peter Tyrer

This chapter describes the universal problems with the issue of diagnosis for the psychiatric disorders. Taxonomies, DSM-5 and ICD-10, ICD-11, are symptom driven with no biological markers. This is in contrast to medical disorders which years ago began to derive their diagnoses on the basis of mechanisms of action, and guided diagnosis where it could be done by biological markers. This means in psychiatry there are not “zones of rarity” between diagnoses and there is considerable symptom overlap among the diagnosis. Research attempts to improve this condition are explored: (1) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and (2) genetic studies. The concept that depression is a systemic disorder and not just a mental disorder is enhanced with our increasing understanding of the biology underlying the disorder and its effects on the body.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Poland ◽  
Barbara Von Eckardt

We argue that dominant research approaches concerning mental illness, which are centered on traditional categories of psychiatric classification as codified in the DSM-IV, have serious empirical, conceptual, and foundational problems. These problems have led to a classification scheme and body of research findings that provide a very poor map of the domain of mental illness, a map that, in turn, undermines clinical and research pursuits. We discuss some current efforts to respond to these problems and argue that the DSM-5 revision process is not very promising, whereas the NIMH Research Domain Criteria initiative and some recent research in cognitive neuroscience fares better, although the latter remains potentially compromised by residual influences of the DSM-based approach. We conclude with some lessons and suggestions for the pursuit of alternative research pathways.


10.17816/cp62 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Alexander B. Shmukler

This article presents the evolution of views on schizophrenia diagnostics over the course of 150 years, beginning from the pre-Kraepelin period and ending with concepts developed in recent decades. Consideration is given to the merits and demerits of contemporary official classifications (DSM-5 and ICD-11) as well as to alternative approaches, particularly in relation to scientific research, and their prospects for development. Special attention is paid to the Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC) of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Another promising area discussed in this paper relates to network analysis as a method for the investigation of psychotic disorders, particularly schizophrenia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document