scholarly journals Subtle messaging changes could boost organ donor numbers

2021 ◽  
Vol 193 (19) ◽  
pp. E700-E701
Author(s):  
Diana Duong
Keyword(s):  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e025159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Noyes ◽  
Leah McLaughlin ◽  
Karen Morgan ◽  
Philip Walton ◽  
Rebecca Curtis ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo determine the short-term impact of a soft opt-out organ donation system on consent rates and donor numbers.DesignBefore and after observational study using bespoke routinely collected data.SettingNational Health Service Blood and Transplant.Participants205 potential organ donor cases in Wales.InterventionsThe Act and implementation strategy.Primary and secondary outcomesConsent rates at 18 months post implementation compared with 3 previous years, and organ donor numbers 21 months before and after implementation. Changes in organ donor register activity post implementation for 18 months.ResultsThe consent rate for all modes of consent was 61.0% (125/205), showing a recovery from the dip to 45.8% in 2014/2015. 22.4% (46/205) were deemed consented donors: consent rate 60.8% (28/46). Compared with the 3 years before the switch there was a significant difference in Welsh consent rates (χ2 p value=0.009). Over the same time period, rest of the UK consent rates also significantly increased from 58.6% (5256/8969) to 63.1% (2913/4614) (χ2 p value<0.0001), therefore the Wales increase cannot be attributed to the Welsh legislation change. Deceased donors did not increase: 101 compared with 104. Organ donation registration increased from 34% to 38% with 6% registering to opt-out.ConclusionThis is the first rigorous initial evaluation with bespoke data collected on all cases. The longer-term impact on consent rates and donor numbers is unclear. Concerns about a potential backlash and mass opting out were not realised. The move to a soft opt-out system has not resulted in a step change in organ donation behaviour, but can be seen as the first step of a longer journey. Policymakers should not assume that soft opt-out systems by themselves simply need more time to have a meaningful effect. Ongoing interventions to further enhance implementation and the public’s understanding of organ donation are needed to reach the 2020 target of 80% consent rates. Further longitudinal monitoring is required.


2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1323-1329
Author(s):  
Yvette OʼBrien ◽  
Shaila Chavan ◽  
Sue Huckson ◽  
Graeme Russ ◽  
Helen Opdam ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (9) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
M De Jager ◽  
C Wilmans ◽  
J Fabian ◽  
J F Botha ◽  
H R Etheredge

Author(s):  
Eamonn Ferguson ◽  
Abigail R A Edwards ◽  
Barbara M Masser

Abstract Background Against a background of declining blood donor numbers, recruiting new donors is critical for the effective operations of healthcare providers. Thus, interventions are needed to recruit new blood donors. Purpose We provide initial evidence for Voluntary Reciprocal Altruism (VRA) to enhance nondonors’ willingness to become blood donors. VRA interventions involve asking two questions: one on accepting a blood transfusion if needed and one on willingness to donate. As early trials often use self-reports of willingness to perform blood donation behavior, we derive a correction factor to better estimate actual behavior. Finally, we explore the effect of VRA interventions on two prosocial emotions: gratitude and guilt. Methods Across three experiments (two in the UK and one in Australia: Total N = 1,208 nondonors) we manipulate VRA messages and explore how they affect both reported willingness to make a one-off or repeat blood donation and influence click through to blood donation, organ donation and volunteering registration sites (behavioral proxies). We report data from a longitudinal cohort (N = 809) that enables us to derive a correction for self-reported behavioral willingness. Results Across the three experiments, we show that exposure to a question that asks about accepting a transfusion if needed increased willingness to donate blood with some spillover to organ donor registration. We also show that gratitude has an independent effect on donation and report a behavioral correction factor of .10. Conclusions Asking nondonors about accepting a transfusion if needed is likely to be an effective strategy to increase new donor numbers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet Rosanne Etheredge ◽  
Claire Penn ◽  
Jennifer Watermeyer

Introduction: South Africa is faced with very low deceased organ donor numbers. Often, sociocultural practices, which are thought to be fundamentally opposed to deceased organ donation, are hailed as the cause. However, other factors such as context, social perceptions, and clinical environment may play a role. Aim: The aim of this article is to present research that explored communication in organ transplant and identified barriers to organ donation decisions in a province of South Africa. Methods: Qualitative methods were used. Thirty semistructured interviews with transplant professionals and 2 focus groups with transplant coordinators took place across 6 health institutions in Gauteng Province. Results: Barriers that may prevent transplant professionals from referring potential donors were identified: The wider public and transplant professionals may be suspicious of biomedicine and have a perception that people could be killed for their organs. Organ donation was sometimes framed as “murder,” “killing,” or a “bunch of vultures.” Doctors may be unwilling to refer brain-dead patients, as this was seen as failing in one’s professional duty to cure the patient. The role of sociocultural practices was inconclusive, with the sample divided based on the extent of their influence. Conclusion: Low donor numbers may be a manifestation of barriers to referral in the clinical setting. These barriers interplay in a context of suspicion and are framed by a clinical transplant discourse that is sometimes loaded with negative connotation. Sociocultural practices are influential, but they may not be the overriding cause of low donor numbers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document