scholarly journals Transforaminal epidural steroid injections prevent the need for surgery in patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective case series

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Manson ◽  
Melissa McKeon ◽  
Edward Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injections ◽  
Retrospective Case Series ◽  
Epidural Steroid

scholarly journals The Impact of Epidural Steroid Injections on the Outcomes of Patients Treated for Lumbar Disc Herniation

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (15) ◽  
pp. 1353-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Radcliff ◽  
Alan Hilibrand ◽  
Jon D Lurie ◽  
Tor D Tosteson ◽  
Lawrence Delasotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injections ◽  
Epidural Steroid ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Study on the functional outcome of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 607
Author(s):  
S. Natarajan ◽  
Anjan Venkataraman Krishnamurthy ◽  
R. Kalanithi ◽  
M. D. Ilavarasan
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injections ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Epidural Steroid

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intervertebral disc herniation of the lumbar region is one of the common causes of acute low back ache and lower extremity pain. While multiple treatment modalities exist, the efficacy of the usage of a transforaminal steroid injection as a tool to either alleviate pain or delay surgery needs to be further evaluated. The aim of this study is to determine the functional outcome of patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation treated with fluroscopically-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a prospective case study in which total of 43 patients were included in the study dating between August 2014 and July 2015. These patients were evaluated and identified with lumbar disc herniation, confirmed with a magnetic resonance imaging prior to the procedure. A pre-injection VAS score was taken. These patients were administered TFESI under fluoroscopic guidance using 2ml of 40mg of Methylprednisolone with 1 ml of 2% xylocaine. They were then evaluated during follow up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Their pain outcome was evaluated using the VAS (visual analog scale) scores and functional outcome was evaluated using Oswestry disability index (ODI).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> All patients showed significant improvement in the VAS score during their regular follow up when compared to their pre injection levels. Patient satisfaction was the high at 2 weeks post operatively slightly declining over time. 3 patients underwent surgery during the follow up period. The ODI scores also showed significant improvements when compared to the pre injection scores at all follow up periods</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TFESI provides significant short-term pain relief in patients suffering from a single level lumbar herniated disc and is a viable, effective short-term analgesic tool to address pain and may retard an early surgical intervention.</p>

Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections Followed by Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy to Prevent Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1100-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans van Helvoirt ◽  
Adri T. Apeldoorn ◽  
Raymond W. Ostelo ◽  
Dirk L. Knol ◽  
Mark P. Arts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injections ◽  
Diagnosis And Therapy ◽  
Epidural Steroid

scholarly journals Contrast Flow Selectivity During Transforaminal Lumbosacral Epidural Steroid Injections

2008 ◽  
Vol 6;11 (12;6) ◽  
pp. 855-861
Author(s):  
Michael B. Furman
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Space ◽  
Nerve Root ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Epidural Steroid Injections ◽  
Needle Position ◽  
Epidural Steroid ◽  
Contrast Flow

Background: Lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (LS-TFESIs) are an accepted procedure used in the comprehensive, conservative care for lumbar disc pathology and/or spinal stenosis induced low back pain with a radicular component. Historically, the terminology used to describe the transforaminal technique of instilling medications into the epidural space and/or exiting structures has varied. These procedures have also been referred to as either diagnostic or therapeutic selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs). Although this procedure is typically used to “selectively” treat isolated pathology, the “SNRB” terminology suggests that one can selectively diagnose or treat a specific nerve root as a pain generator by anesthetizing or blocking it. It has been recently demonstrated that L4 and L5 SNRBs are often non-“selective” by investigating the extent of epidural contrast flow patterns after injecting 1.0 mL of contrast. Our study attempts to identify the minimum injectate volume at which LS-TFESIs may still be considered “selective” with no injectate extending to either the adjacent (superior and/or inferior) levels or to the contralateral side. Objective: Quantitatively evaluate contrast flow level selectivity noted during fluoroscopically guided lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (LS-TFESIs). Study Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, observational human study. Methods: Thirty patients (female = 10, male = 20) undergoing LS-TFESIs were investigated. After confirming appropriate spinal needle position with biplanar imaging, 4.0 mL of nonionic contrast was slowly injected. Fluoroscopic images were recorded at 0.5 mL increments. These biplanar contrast flow images were evaluated to determine which 0.5 mL volume increment was no longer specific for the injected level. In particular, we documented when contrast extended either to a superior or inferior spinal segment or crossed the midline spine to the contralateral side. Results: After injecting 0.5 mL of contrast, 30% of LS-TFESIs performed in this study were no longer “selective” for the specified root level. After injecting 1.0 mL of contrast, 67% of LS-TFESIs performed in this study were no longer “selective” for the specified root level. After injecting 1.5 mL of contrast, 87% of LS-TFESIs performed in this study were no longer “selective” for the specified root level. After injecting 2.5 mL of contrast, 90% of LS-TFESIs performed in this study were no longer “selective” for the specified root level. Conclusions: Diagnostic LS-TFESI or SNRB blocks limiting injectate to a single, ipsilateral segmental level cannot reliably be considered diagnostically selective with volumes exceeding 0.5mL. Injectate volumes greater than 0.5mL are consistently non-selective and cannot be used reliably for diagnostic block procedures in the epidural space. Key words: Epidural steroid injections, selective nerve root block, transforaminal, contrast flow

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document