scholarly journals Perioperative gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty: Does outpatient surgery compromise patient outcomes?

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. E407-E413
Author(s):  
Bryn O. Zomar ◽  
Dianne M. Bryant ◽  
Susan W. Hunter ◽  
James L. Howard ◽  
Brent A. Lanting
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Outpatient Group ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Postoperative Time ◽  
Inpatient Group ◽  
Single Limb Support

Background: There has been a continuing trend toward decreasing the length of hospital stay for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to investigate the impact of timing of discharge on gait and patient-reported outcomes early after THA. Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study conducted from May 2014 to November 2015, we measured gait velocity, stride length, single-limb support and single-limb support symmetry in adults aged 18−75 years before direct anterior THA, at discharge from the hospital, and 2, 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Patients were discharged on the same day as surgery (outpatient group) or stayed at least 1 night in hospital (inpatient group). Participants also completed the Timed Up and Go test (all postoperative time points) and a series of questionnaires (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [6 and 12 wk], 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [2, 6 and 12 wk], Harris Hip Score [12 wk] and a pain visual analogue scale [all postoperative time points]). Results: Thirty-six participants were enrolled in the study, of whom 16 were outpatients and 20 were inpatients. The mean pain rating at the time of discharge was lower in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (adjusted mean difference −1.5, 95% confidence interval −3.0 to 0.0). We found no other significant differences between the groups for any gait, patient-reported or surgical outcome. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in gait or patient-reported outcomes after direct anterior THA between patients who stayed overnight and those who were discharged as outpatients. Patients discharged as outpatients were younger than those who stayed overnight. Our results suggest that discharging patients as an outpatient after direct anterior THA may have a similar impact on patient function and outcomes as a standard overnight stay in hospital.

Importance of Retaining Sufficient Acetabular Depth: Successful 2-Year Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Patients With Pincer Morphology as Compared With Matched Controls

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 2471-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia R. Brick ◽  
Catherine J. Bacon ◽  
Matthew J. Brick
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Acetabular Overcoverage

Background: Patients with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement are commonly treated with arthroscopic reduction of acetabular depth as measured by the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA). The optimal amount of rim reduction has not been established, although large resections may increase contact pressures through the hip. A recent publication demonstrated inferior surgical outcomes in patients with acetabular overcoverage as compared with normal acetabular coverage. Casual observation of our database suggested equivalent improvements, prompting a similar analysis. Purpose: To analyze patient-reported outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients with acetabular overcoverage who were matched with controls with normal coverage, as well as to analyze associations with reduction in LCEA. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were collected prospectively from patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up after receiving hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement by a single surgeon. Cases were reviewed to identify those with pincer-type morphology (LCEA >40°) and matched according to sex, age, chondral damage, and surgery date in a 1:1 ratio with controls with an LCEA of 25° to 40°. The surgical goal was to reduce the LCEA to the upper end of the normal range with minimal rim resection, usually 35° to 37°. Radiographic measurements of coverage, intraoperative findings, procedures, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded, including the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool, Non-arthritic Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, visual analog scale for pain, rates of revision or reoperation, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Results: A total of 114 hips (93 patients) for the pincer group were matched 1:1 from 616 hips (541 patients) for the control group. The pincer group (mean ± SD age, 34.5 ± 12.2 years) did not differ in age, body mass index, or follow-up from controls. LCEA was reduced in both groups pre- to postoperatively: the pincer group from 44.0° ± 2.8° to 34.2° ± 3.5° and the controls from 32.9° ± 3.9° to 31.0° ± 3.0°. No differences in improvement were observed: iHOT-12 improved by 35.7 points in both groups ( P = .9 for analysis of variance interaction) and Nonarthritic Hip Score by 22.3 points ( P = .6). From all eligible surgical procedures, 2-year follow up rates were 2.5% and 2.6% for the pincer and control cohorts, respectively, and 1.2% and 0.3% for conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Conclusion: Arthroscopic management of acetabular overcoverage can achieve excellent results, equivalent to arthroscopy for other causes of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. A key finding was smaller rim resections producing a mean postoperative LCEA of 34.2° with a small standard deviation.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Finch ◽  
Brook I. Martin ◽  
Patricia D. Franklin ◽  
Laurence S. Magder ◽  
Vincent D. Pellegrini
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported

Patient-Reported Outcomes Can Be Used to Streamline Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty Follow-Up to High-Risk Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 3319-3321
Author(s):  
Jie J. Yao ◽  
Hilal Maradit Kremers ◽  
Cathy D. Schleck ◽  
Dirk R. Larson ◽  
Jasvinder A. Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Risk Patients

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Predictors after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Results from the Dresden Hip Surgery Registry

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Haase ◽  
Christian Kopkow ◽  
Franziska Beyer ◽  
Jörg Lützner ◽  
Stephan Kirschner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Hip Surgery ◽  
Outcome Predictors ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Stratified by Body Mass Index

Orthopedics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. e572-e577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddie S. Wu ◽  
Jeffrey J. Cherian ◽  
Julio J. Jauregui ◽  
Kristin Robinson ◽  
Steven F. Harwin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported

Simplified biplanar classification for heterotopic ossification is more predictive of patient-reported outcomes than the Brooker classification after anterior total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110391
Author(s):  
Leonard T Onsen ◽  
Vivian W Ouyang ◽  
Andrew E Jimenez ◽  
Peter F Monahan ◽  
Ajay C Lall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) commonly occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and can adversely impact clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to propose a more reliable HO grading method that is better predictive of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after THA than the Brooker classification. Methods: 513 THAs (62 ± 10 years old) were reviewed. The incidence and grade of HO was evaluated using the Brooker grading system and a simplified biplanar classification system (grade 1: ⩾1 cm between bone on both anteroposterior and lateral views, grade 2: <1 cm between bone on either view). The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain were collected at minimum of 2 years after surgery and were compared between HO grades using multiple regression models. Results: The incidence of HO varied by Brooker grade (grade 1, 23.4%; grade 2, 22.4%; grade 3, 7.2%; grade 4, 0%) and biplanar grade (grade 1: 45.6%; grade 2: 7.4%). The biplanar classification demonstrated higher interobserver reliability than the Brooker classification (κ = 0.95 and 0.91, respectively). Brooker grade 3 HO decreased the mHHS by 6.5 (standard error: 2.7) but did not have a significant effect on FJS or VAS. Biplanar grade 2 HO decreased the mHHS by 9.9 (standard error: 2.7), the FJS by 12.9 (standard error: 4.51) and increased the VAS pain score by 0.81 (standard error: 0.35). The Cox test was used to compare the fit of regression models and determined the biplanar classification was a significantly better predictor than the Brooker classification ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Biplanar grade 2 HO had a significant negative influence on PROs. Contrary to previous literature, these results show clinical significance of non-bridging HO. Compared with the Brooker classification, the biplanar classification has greater interobserver reliability and is more predictive of outcomes after THA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document