scholarly journals Retrospective evaluation of ileocolic artery and vein diameters according to body mass index in diagnosis of acute appendicitis on multislice computerized tomography

Author(s):  
Yahya Baraç
2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 486-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Josephson ◽  
J. Styrud ◽  
S. Eriksson

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Atakan Ozkan ◽  
Aylin Hande Gokce ◽  
Feridun Suat Gokce

<b>Background:</b> Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. Delay in diagnosis increases the mortality and morbidity. <br><b>Aim: </b>In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the body mass index is useful in diagnosis and whether the neutrophil /lymphocyte and platelet/lymphocyte ratios can help in determining the inflammation level of acute appendicitis. <br><b>Meterial and Methods:</b> Cases of appendectomy performed between June 2012 and December 2018 in our clinic were analyzed retrospectively. Based on the pathology results of the cases included in the study, 4 groups were formed, i.e.: Group 1 (initial stage), Group 2 (catarrhal stage), Group 3 (phlegmonous-gangrenous stage) and Group 4 (perforation). The study compared age, body mass index, leukocyte values, red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet /lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) between groups. <br><b> Results:</b> 828 cases were included in the study. When compared between groups, the values of Group 3 and Group 4 were higher than those of Group 1 and Group 2 for PLR and NLR. There was no difference in RDW and MPV values in the blood. When Body Mass Index (BMI) was compared between groups, it was found to be significantly higher with increasing histopathological stage. <br><b>Conclusion:</b> In acute appendicitis, the blood leukocyte value, elevated PLR and NLR are helpful in diagnosis. We aimed to emphasize that the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is delayed in patients with a BMI above 30 and/or at age of over 40 years, with the perforation rate being determined more frequently.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1223-1228
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Muñoz-Cofré ◽  
Aldo Abarca-Ortega ◽  
Pablo A Lizana ◽  
Jorge Quiñones-Rodríguez ◽  
Claudio García-Herrera ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Pepijn Eijsvogel ◽  
Sander Van Kuijk ◽  
James van Bastelaar

Objective: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, for which sonography is widely used to assess the presence of absence of appendicitis. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the diagnostic accuracy of sonography in patients with a suspected case of acute appendicitis. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted in all patients who were assessed for acute appendicitis (with sonography) in two emergency rooms of a large hospital. The sonography result was compared with the pathological report in patients who underwent surgery under suspicion of an acute appendicitis. Results: A multivariate analysis revealed that operator (radiologist or resident), time of the sonogram, site (hospital), and body mass index were independent variables significantly influencing the sonographic result. Correctly diagnosing suspected appendicitis with sonography is 2.2 times more likely when performed by a radiologist compared to a resident. Conclusions: Sonography is widely used in diagnosing appendicitis in the emergency room. In this study, the probability of sonography being correctly diagnosed decreases during on-call hours or when conducted by a resident in patients with suspected appendicitis. Furthermore, increasing body mass index decreases the probability of a sonogram being correct when conducted by a resident compared to a radiologist.


2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 522-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alana Desai ◽  
Ahmad M Tawfik ◽  
Robert S Figenshau ◽  
Sam B Bhayani ◽  
Nitin Das ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Murugesan Manoharan ◽  
Martha A. Reyes ◽  
Alan M. Nieder ◽  
Bruce R. Kava ◽  
MarkS Soloway

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Robert L. Grubb ◽  
David L. Levin ◽  
Paul F. Pinsky ◽  
Jerome Mabie ◽  
Thomas L. Riley ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document