scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Open vs. Laparoscopic Resection of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Sebastien Pelletier ◽  
Richdeep S. Gill ◽  
Sayf Gazala ◽  
Shahzeer Karmali
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stromal Tumors

Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery for Large Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095148
Author(s):  
Miao Yu ◽  
Deng-chao Wang ◽  
Jian Wei ◽  
Yue-hua Lei ◽  
Zhao-jun Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Open Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Disease Free

Background The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) larger than 5 cm. Method We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for relevant articles. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials were identified and included in this study. Searching for related articles on large GIST (>5 cm) for laparoscopic resection (laparoscopic group [LAPG]) and open resection (open group [OG]), RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis, comparing 2 groups of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results Seven studies including 440 patients were identified for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that LAPG had less bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and a better 5-year disease-free survival. There was no significant difference between LAPG and OG in operation time, postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and overall survival. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection of large (>5 cm) GIST is safe and feasible and has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss and fast postoperative recovery, with a good outcome in the recent oncology.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Resections for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 3549-3560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye-Xin Koh ◽  
Aik-Yong Chok ◽  
Hui-Li Zheng ◽  
Chuen-Seng Tan ◽  
Pierce K. H. Chow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stromal Tumors

scholarly journals Sa1935 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION FOR THE GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB256-AB257
Author(s):  
Amaninder J. Dhaliwal ◽  
Harmeet S. Mashiana ◽  
Ajay Pal Singh ◽  
Banreet S. Dhindsa ◽  
Aravdeep Jhand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Stromal Tumors

scholarly journals Tu1504 ENDOSCOPIC VS. SURGICAL RESECTION FOR GASTRIC GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS <5CM IN SIZE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB594
Author(s):  
Faisal Kamal ◽  
Muhammad Ali Khan ◽  
Arslan Talat ◽  
Christy Gilman ◽  
Hafiz Muhammad Sharjeel Arshad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stromal Tumors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document