scholarly journals Does Teacher Education Matter? Comparison of Education and Science Major Teachers’ Assessment Literacy

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (26) ◽  
Author(s):  
Betul DEMIRDOGEN ◽  
Hatice Merve KORKUT
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Assessment Literacy ◽  
Science Major

scholarly journals The impact of conceptions of assessment on assessment literacy in a teacher education program

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1225380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Charles Deneen ◽  
Gavin T.L. Brown ◽  
Darlene Ciuffetelli Parker
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Teacher Education Program ◽  
Assessment Literacy ◽  
Conceptions Of Assessment ◽  
The Impact

Preparing Assessment Literate Teachers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher DeLuca ◽  
Heather Braund
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Beginning Teachers ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Student Teachers ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teacher Assessment ◽  
Initial Teacher Education ◽  
Assessment Literacy ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Teacher Assessment Literacy

A standards-based accountability paradigm of education currently shapes teaching and learning in many schools around the world. This paradigm is characterized by increased academic standards and greater levels of assessment throughout learning periods. Across policy and curriculum documents, teachers are called to implement assessments to monitor, support, and report on student learning. Assessments can be formative (i.e., used to inform teaching and learning processes) or summative (i.e., used to communicate achievement through grades) and based on a variety of evidence (e.g., tests, performance tasks, conversations, observations, and so on). Given the growing emphasis on assessment as a dominant aspect of contemporary teaching and learning, there is a need for teachers to be assessment literate. The term assessment literacy was initially used to refer to the knowledge and skills teachers required in the area of assessment, historically with a strong focus on principles of measurement and test design. Over the past decade, however, the concept of assessment literacy has evolved. Newer notions of assessment literacy have moved away from demarcating the knowledge and skills needed for competency in assessment and instead recognize that assessment literacy is a contextual and social practice that requires teachers to negotiate their knowledge of assessment in relation to their pedagogy, curriculum, and classroom contexts. Central to this conception is the view that teacher assessment literacy is both sociocultural and contextual, shaped by various factors including teacher background, experience, professional learning, classroom context, student interactions and behaviors, curriculum, and class diversity. With the increased role of assessment in schools, pressure has been placed on initial teacher education programs to prepare beginning teachers with the necessary capacity to become assessment literate. While much of the existing research in the area of assessment education has focused on the value of discrete courses on teacher learning in assessment or on specific pedagogical approaches to enhancing student learning in assessment, results continue to point toward the need for more comprehensive preparation of teachers for the current standards-based paradigm of education. Accordingly, two frameworks for assessment education are described that consider multiple dimensions to preparing assessment literate teachers. These frameworks are DeLuca’s Assessment Education Framework and Xu and Brown’s Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice Framework. These assessment education frameworks were selected as they work within a contemporary constructivist and sociocultural view of assessment literacy. The two frameworks suggest areas for teacher education that not only include the fundamentals for assessment literacy but also move beyond the fundamentals to engage the messier dimensions of what it means to do assessment work in schools. In both cases, student teachers are pressed to make connections and challenged to enact ideas in context to refine and synthesize their thinking. Xu and Brown detailed the macro- and micro-level influences that further shape assessment decisions in action. The composite picture is that learning to assess is not a neat and tidy enterprise of textbook curriculum. Instead, it is about learning foundational ideas and building an integrated stance toward teacher as assessor through contextualized reflective learning. Driving this learning is an enduring understanding that one’s assessment literacy is always in the making—a continuously evolving competency in relation to new contexts and experiences.

scholarly journals The Evolving Concept of (Language) Assessment Literacy. Implications for Teacher Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-130
Author(s):  
Ildikó Csépes
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Classroom Assessment ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Language Teachers ◽  
Assessment Literacy ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Assessment Decisions ◽  
Context Specific

Language teachers’ assessment knowledge and skills have received considerable attention from language assessment researchers over the past few decades (Davison & Leung, 2009; Hill & McNamara, 2012; Rea-Dickins, 2001; Taylor, 2013). This seems to be linked to the increased professionalism expected of them in classroom-based assessments. However, teachers seem to face a number of challenges, including how large-scale standardized language exams influence their classroom assessment practices. Teachers’ assessment literacy, therefore, needs to be examined in order to explain their assessment decisions. In this paper, we review the concept of (language) assessment literacy, how it has evolved and how it is conceptualized currently. Recent interpretations seem to reflect a multidimensional, dynamic and situated view of (language) assessment literacy. Implications for teacher education are also highlighted by presenting research findings from studies that explored teachers’ and teacher candidates’ assessment literacy in various educational contexts. As a result, we can identify some common patterns in classroom assessment practices as well as context-specific training needs. Finally, we make a recommendation for tackling some of the challenges language teachers are facing in relation to classroom-based assessment in the Hungarian context.

A Case Study in Japanese Teacher Education

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lowell Brubaker
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document