scholarly journals The Influence of 16-weeks of Periodized Resistance Training on Vertical Leap and TW20meters Performance Tests for Volleyball Players

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Ídico Luiz PELLEGRIONITTI
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Performance Tests ◽  
Volleyball Players ◽  
Vertical Leap

scholarly journals Strength and Power Changes During an In-season Resistance Training Program for Male CIS Volleyball Players

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doug Hillis ◽  
Matthew Okrainec
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Squat Jump ◽  
Vertical Jump Height ◽  
Linear Resistance ◽  
Body Strength ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Volleyball Players ◽  
Jump Power ◽  
Lower Body Strength

Previous research has indicated that performing repetitions to failure at greater than 80% one repetition max (1 RM) one day per week using a non-­‐linear training program can maintain strength and power in many athletic populations. However, this finding has not been directly assessed in male university volleyball players. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-­‐linear training two days a week could maintain upper and lower body strength, and vertical jump power and height over the course of a competitive volleyball season, measured at three time points. Eleven trained Canadian Interuniversity Sport (CIS) male athletes were a part of a single training group which completed a maintenance program consisting of non-­‐linear training for 17 weeks. At each testing time point, the participants completed a bench press, squat, squat jump, countermovement jump, and three step jump and reach. We predicted that non-­‐linear resistance training of mixed intensities twice a week would allow players to maintain strength, vertical jump power, and vertical jump height. Results indicated that upper body strength can be maintained over the course of a competition period with non-­‐linear resistance training (p = 0.043). Scores for lower body strength, vertical jump squat jump power, vertical jump countermovement jump power, and vertical jump height increased over the course of the season (p's < 0.001, 0.14, 0.181, and 0.006, respectively). Our results indicate that male volleyball players can benefit from non-­‐linear training to maintain or improve performance when training at > 80% 1 RM to failure once a week during a competition season. 

In-Season Resistance Training for Professional Male Volleyball Players

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 16-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario A. Cardoso Marques ◽  
Juan José González-Badillo ◽  
Darlene A. Kluka
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Volleyball Players

scholarly journals Effect of long-term training adaptation on isokinetic strength in college male volleyball players

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 236-241
Author(s):  
A. Kafkas ◽  
M.E. Kafkas ◽  
S. Savaş
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Flexor Muscle ◽  
Knee Strength ◽  
Volleyball Players ◽  
Angular Velocities ◽  
Knee Muscle ◽  
Flexor Strength

Background and Study Aim: Most of this study focused on endurance, power, and anthropometric measurements but no research declared isokinetic strength changes during two years. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of resistance exercises on two seasonal alters in isokinetic strength of knee muscles at different angular velocities, in college volleyball players. Material and Methods: Thirteen college volleyball players, (age: 21.75 years, body mass: 78.60 kg, and height: 187.0 cm) participated in the study. All college volleyball players take part in the two-year (8 month each year) volleyball-specific training and competitions. The measurement of peak isokinetic concentric knee extension and knee flexion torque in both legs were taken at 2 angular velocities of movement, low at 60° s-1, and intermediate at 180° s-1. Results: The pre- and post-test values of the peak isokinetic strength found that statistical significance difference, at 60° s-1 and 180° s-1 for knee extensor-flexor both dominant and non-dominant in favor of post-tests. Significant enhances were observed in the baseline dominant knee extensor-flexor muscle strength (extensor knee strength 60° s-1: 19.0%, 180° s-1: 20.5%, flexor knee strength, 60° s-1: 33.4%, 180° s-1: 31.4%) respectively. Non-dominant knee extensor-flexor muscle strength increased significantly over the two-year period (extensor knee strength 60° s-1: 21.3%, 180° s-1: 23.0%, flexor knee strength, 60° s-1: 37.4%, 180° s-1: 33.9%) respectively. Conclusion: As a result, our data suggests that the two-year planned program of specific volleyball and resistance training can increase the knee muscle extensor-flexor strength and H:Q ratios of volleyball players. Especially, at a 60° s-1 and 180° s-1 angular velocities, whilst the knee muscle extensor-flexor strength and H:Q ratios for dominant and non-dominant legs were increasing, also H:Q ratios disproportion were decreasing. Therefore, these alters indicated that regular specific-volleyball and resistance training can increase knee muscle extensor-flexor strength and H:Q ratios for dominant and non-dominant legs.

scholarly journals Resistance Training Acutely Impairs Agility and Spike-Specific Performance Measures in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players Returning from the Off-Season

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 6448
Author(s):  
Kenji Doma ◽  
Jonathan Connor ◽  
Daniel Gahreman ◽  
Daniel Boullosa ◽  
Juha P. Ahtiainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Soreness ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Countermovement Jump ◽  
Post Exercise ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
Volleyball Players ◽  
Run Up ◽  
Speed Accuracy ◽  
Speed And Accuracy

This study examined the acute effects of resistance training (RT) on volleyball-specific performance. Sixteen female volleyball players undertook their initial, pre-season RT bout. Countermovement jump (CMJ), delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS), and sport-specific performances (i.e., run-up jump, agility, and spiking speed and accuracy) were measured before, 24 (T24), and 48 (T48) hours after RT. A significant increase in DOMS was observed at T24 and T48 (~207.6% ± 119.3%; p < 0.05; ES = 1.8 (95% CI: 0.94–2.57)), whilst agility was significantly impaired at T48 (1.7% ± 2.5%; p < 0.05; ES = 0.30 (95% CI: −0.99–0.40)). However, there were no differences in CMJ (~−2.21% ± 7.6%; p > 0.05; ES = −0.11 (95% CI: −0.80–0.58)) and run-up jump (~−1.4% ± 4.7%; p > 0.05; ES = −0.07 (95% CI: −0.76–0.63)). Spiking speed was significantly reduced (−3.5% ± 4.4%; p < 0.05; ES = −0.28 (95% CI: −0.43–0.97)), although accuracy was improved (38.3% ± 81.4%: p < 0.05) at T48. Thus, the initial, preseason RT bout compromised agility and spiking speed for several days post-exercise. Conversely, spiking accuracy improved, suggesting a speed–accuracy trade-off. Nonetheless, at least a 48-h recovery may be necessary after the initial RT bout for athletes returning from the off-season or injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document