scholarly journals Outcomes of Same-Day Orthopedic Surgery: Are Spine Patients More Likely to Have Optimal Immediate Recovery From Outpatient Procedures?

10.14444/8043 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 8043
Author(s):  
Sara Naessig ◽  
Bhaveen H. Kapadia ◽  
Waleed Ahmad ◽  
Katherine Pierce ◽  
Shaleen Vira ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis C. Crawford ◽  
Chuan Silvia Li ◽  
Sheila Sprague ◽  
Mohit Bhandari

The number of outpatient orthopedic surgeries performed within North America continues to increase. The impact of this change in services on patient outcomes is largely unknown. The objective of this review is to compare patient outcomes and associated costs for outpatient orthopedic surgeries traditionally performed in hospital to inpatient surgeries, as well as to summarize the eligibility and preoperative education requirements for outpatient orthopedic surgery in North America. We performed a systematic review of Medline, Pubmed and Embase databases for articles comparing the clinical and economic impact of outpatient orthopedic surgical procedures versus inpatient procedures in North America. We reported on requirements for inpatient <em>versus</em> outpatient care, preoperative education requirements, complications and patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and when available total mean costs. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Eligibility requirements for outpatient orthopedic surgery within the included studies varied, but generally included: patient consent, a caregiver at home following surgery, close proximity to an outpatient center, and no history of serious medical problems. Preoperative education programs were not always compulsory and practices varied between outpatient centers. All of the reviewed studies reported that outpatient surgeries had similar or improved level of pain and rates of nausea. Outpatients reported increased satisfaction with the care they received. As expected, outpatient procedures were less expensive than inpatient procedures. This review found that outpatient procedures in North America appear to be less expensive and safe alternatives to inpatient care for patients who are at lower risk for complications and procedures that do not necessarily require close hospital level care monitoring following same day surgery.


JAMA ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 213 (5) ◽  
pp. 816
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Mitchel L. Zoler ◽  
Doug Brunk

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2317-PUB
Author(s):  
RAJESH GARG ◽  
SHREYA BHANDARI ◽  
RAQUEL REIN ◽  
MARIE E. MCDONNELL

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sanching Tsay ◽  
Carolee Winstein

Neurorehabilitation relies on core principles of neuroplasticity to activate and engage latent neural connections, promote detour circuits, and reverse impairments. Clinical interventions incorporating these principles have been shown to promote recovery while demoting compensation. However, many clinicians struggle to find evidence for these principles in our growing but nascent body of literature. Regulatory bodies and organizational balance sheets further discourage evidence-based, methodical, time-intensive, and efficacious interventions because practical needs often outweigh and dominate clinical decision making. Modern neurorehabilitation practices that result from these pressures favor strategies that encourage compensation over those that promote recovery. With a focus on helping the busy clinician evaluate the rapidly growing literature, we put forth five simple rules that direct clinicians toward intervention studies that value more enduring but slower biological recovery processes over the more alluring practical and immediate “recovery” mantra. Filtering emerging literature through this critical lens has the potential to change practice and lead to more durable long-term outcomes. This perspective is meant to serve a new generation of mechanistically minded clinicians, students, and trainees poised to not only advance our field but to also erect policy changes that promote recovery-based care of stroke survivors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document